Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Charlotte wins this - they have built a fantastic city basically out of nothing.
Their skyline, transit and attention to detail shows that this city is doing everything right.
Are you joking? These cities are freaking dying faster than a heart attack.
They are all overrated in every way.
They are just trying to hang onto 1977 when they were relevant.
I agree. The listed cities are not doing so well. I left Cleveland a few years ago...best move I ever made. I visited Detroit for the first time in 2015 and stayed downtown at the Westin, as I heard that Detroit was turning around, at least in regards to it's downtown core. I left unimpressed. I thought the city was scary and depressing, a lot like Cleveland.
Are you joking? These cities are freaking dying faster than a heart attack.
They are all overrated in every way.
They are just trying to hang onto 1977 when they were relevant.
You know nothing about these cities or their respective metro regions, Detroit's regional economy is absolutely exploding right now and urban development is at an all-time high. St. Louis' regional population is the highest it's ever been. There is nothing "dying" about these places, turn off Fox News.
In contrast, Charlotte isn't even a real city, it is one of the world's most low-density population centers, it's essentially a giant suburb with an office-park skyline. There is nothing underrated about it.
The fact that you put an unattractive, poorly designed sunbelt city on a pedestal and slander beautiful, old, pre-war cities with increasing vibrancy show that you have questionable taste and/or have no idea what you're talking about.
You know nothing about these cities or their respective metro regions, Detroit's regional economy is absolutely exploding right now and urban development is at an all-time high. St. Louis' regional population is the highest it's ever been. There is nothing "dying" about these places, turn off Fox News.
In contrast, Charlotte isn't even a real city, it is one of the world's most low-density population centers, it's essentially a giant suburb with an office-park skyline. There is nothing underrated about it.
The fact that you put an unattractive, poorly designed sunbelt city on a pedestal and slander beautiful, old, pre-war cities with increasing vibrancy show that you have questionable taste and/or have no idea what you're talking about.
You have obviouslynever been to Charlotte, and just lost all of your credibility on your 123rd post with this inane babbling.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
