Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-22-2019, 10:43 AM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
1,606 posts, read 3,409,871 times
Reputation: 2017

Advertisements

Austin should be should be flirting with the 1,000,000 mark if it doesn't hit it this year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-22-2019, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Seattle WA, USA
5,699 posts, read 4,922,938 times
Reputation: 4942
If the average trends continue

Seattle: 745,000 (2.81%)
Spokane: 218,000 (0.56%)
Tacoma: 216,000 (1.08%)
Vancouver: 178,000 (1.23%)
Bellevue: 148,000 (2.57%)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 11:21 AM
 
14,019 posts, read 15,001,786 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Progress 1 View Post
Minneapolis is at 429,382. Population density nearing 8'000 ppm
Source?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 11:25 AM
 
Location: St. Louis
2,693 posts, read 3,187,296 times
Reputation: 2758
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enean View Post
Honestly, I don't think most Americans really care about the almost exact same size of these three cities. Truly....think about it. I had no clue, and I'm on this forum. Only people associated with these cities, care. I could ask a bunch of people today, if they knew these three cities are almost the same size, and they'd look at me like I was crazy. They just, really, don't care. Not just these 3 cities, but most cities.
They're all pretty similar in terms of amenities and current size at this point. St. Louis maintains the largest metro area by 500,000 people over Pittsburgh and 600,000 over Cincinnati, but they're all in the same ballpark.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 12:30 PM
 
Location: Maryland
4,675 posts, read 7,398,943 times
Reputation: 5358
Quote:
Originally Posted by PerseusVeil View Post
They're all pretty similar in terms of amenities and current size at this point. St. Louis maintains the largest metro area by 500,000 people over Pittsburgh and 600,000 over Cincinnati, but they're all in the same ballpark.
It seems inevitable that St. Louis (the city) will be in the 200Ks soon. I grew up in Illinois ~1 hr from STL (it was "the big city" that we went to whenever we went out) and never thought I'd see the day where the central city had a population approaching Madison, Des Moines, or Aurora. Obviously it anchors a large metro area (waaaaay bigger than Madison or Des Moines, certainly), but one wonders at what point (or even whether) the decline will stop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Ohio
30 posts, read 31,623 times
Reputation: 45
Metro numbers showed Columbus with an increase of 43,000, hitting 2.4 million.

So, based on metro growth, I'd guess Columbus city is capturing around 65% of those people and is set to cross the 900,000 mark for the first time and hit a density of 4000 per sq/mi. Looking back at 2017 numbers, the city was showing 3,971 people per sq/mi so I would be shocked if we didn't hit 4,000 finally.

Cincinnati will probably gain around 1,500 and hit 302,000 people, and I think Cleveland will unfortunately continue to decline by a thousand people or so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 02:58 PM
 
Location: East Coast
1,013 posts, read 910,992 times
Reputation: 1420
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maintainschaos View Post
It seems inevitable that St. Louis (the city) will be in the 200Ks soon. I grew up in Illinois ~1 hr from STL (it was "the big city" that we went to whenever we went out) and never thought I'd see the day where the central city had a population approaching Madison, Des Moines, or Aurora. Obviously it anchors a large metro area (waaaaay bigger than Madison or Des Moines, certainly), but one wonders at what point (or even whether) the decline will stop.
I used to visit when I had a relative there but they left. Hopefully things change for the better, I think the Blues going to the Stanley Cup helps!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 03:57 PM
 
994 posts, read 779,427 times
Reputation: 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevolsDance View Post
Metro numbers showed Columbus with an increase of 43,000, hitting 2.4 million.

So, based on metro growth, I'd guess Columbus city is capturing around 65% of those people and is set to cross the 900,000 mark for the first time and hit a density of 4000 per sq/mi. Looking back at 2017 numbers, the city was showing 3,971 people per sq/mi so I would be shocked if we didn't hit 4,000 finally.

Cincinnati will probably gain around 1,500 and hit 302,000 people, and I think Cleveland will unfortunately continue to decline by a thousand people or so.
Those sound about right from crunching some numbers the past couple of days.

The one reason I remain somewhat optimistic that Cleveland could post a small gain is that last year it only had a loss of 258 people. Just from that and the amount of new construction and home prices rising says it should improve upon that. But I have a feeling the 2017 estimate made up for overstating the losses in 2016 (Detroit may be in that same boat).

But even a loss of 1,000 is not doom and gloom. The city makes up about 30.9 percent of Cuyahoga County's population but would contribute about 22 percent of the population loss from 2017 to 2018, meaning it would be shrinking slower than the county as a whole, something that has been ongoing in recent years. Cleveland will eventually start to gain, but it may not show until the 2020 census (which I think will definitely come in higher than whatever the 2019 estimate shows next year).

This is anecdotal but I know someone who was trying to sell a house in a decent but not very desirable neighborhood about 8 years ago but pulled it off the market because they wanted $90,000 and all the offers were coming in under $50,000. They put it back on the market in the fall at $95,000 and got an offer that fell through. A week later got another offer that went through on the asking price.

They got a house in the most desirable family neighborhood in Cleveland for $150,000. That same house previously sold for $80,000 about 10 years ago. So, there is growing demand for real estate in the city ... and not just in the hot, to-do neighborhoods.

Last edited by ClevelandBrown; 05-22-2019 at 04:10 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 05:49 PM
 
Location: St. Louis
2,693 posts, read 3,187,296 times
Reputation: 2758
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maintainschaos View Post
It seems inevitable that St. Louis (the city) will be in the 200Ks soon. I grew up in Illinois ~1 hr from STL (it was "the big city" that we went to whenever we went out) and never thought I'd see the day where the central city had a population approaching Madison, Des Moines, or Aurora. Obviously it anchors a large metro area (waaaaay bigger than Madison or Des Moines, certainly), but one wonders at what point (or even whether) the decline will stop.
It's certainly puzzling. Some of the hardest hit North City neighborhoods literally border the thriving central corridor. You cross Delmar though, and wham, everything changes. You have to wonder when the spillover finally starts to happen. Maybe after the new National Geospatial Agency West Campus opens in the next few years in North City?

I'd also love to see a breakdown where all these leaving people are coming from. Like I said, there's projects all over the central corridor, and South City has been improving solidly over the years with neighborhood after neighborhood coming back. One has to guess that North City and some select South City neighborhoods are just hemorrhaging *that* badly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 06:34 PM
 
Location: Tampa
121 posts, read 96,789 times
Reputation: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
Source?

10 Minnesota cities that added the most people over last 8 years - Story | KMSP
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top