Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-11-2019, 05:01 AM
sub
 
Location: ^##
4,963 posts, read 3,750,180 times
Reputation: 7831

Advertisements

Milwaukee for the lake, and it’s genuinely a great town all around. Culture and location overrides any shortcomings for me.
The Twin Cities are great, and the supposed isolation would never be a problem for me since I’ve never lived in a major metro where I got so bored I felt I had to go to another nearby one for a good time. It wins some of the criteria, for sure.
I still like Milwaukee better as a place to live based purely on personal preference.
Throwing Madison in with Milwaukee adds no appeal outside of economic interests, but for this unusual comparison, it does little else for Milwaukee as a place to live. As has been previously mentioned, the average person in Milwaukee isn’t likely to head over to Madison very often because there’s no reason to. Far, far more do seem to go to Chicagoland somewhat regularly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-02-2021, 11:29 PM
 
15 posts, read 8,720 times
Reputation: 25
It's hard to compare Minneapolis/St. Paul (which are part of one large metro area) to Milwaukee/Madison (which are not very near), so I will just compare the Twin Cities with Milwaukee. Overall, the Twin Cities win this in almost every area. Milwaukee is a great city, but its proximity to Chicago is, in a sense, its downfall because Chicago sort of leaves Milwaukee behind as a third tier city. In the opposite way, the Twin Cities is sort of unique because it is sort of a hothouse of its own culture, economy and other sectors. Also, the Twin Cities have a much more dynamic, urban feeling. This is just the impression that I had.

Quality of life: Minneapolis/St. Paul
Things to do: Minneapolis/St. Paul
Transportation: Minneapolis/St. Paul
Economy: Minneapolis/St. Paul
Recreation: Minneapolis/St. Paul
Education: Minneapolis/St. Paul
Sports: Minneapolis/St. Paul
Night Life: Minneapolis/St. Paul

While Milwaukee's population (590,000) is larger than either Minneapolls or St. Paul individually, the Twin Cities together are significantly larger (730,000). On top of that, Milwaukee's CSA metro population is just above 2 million whereas the Minneapolis/St. Paul CSA metro population is 4 million. So they are really in different categories.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top