Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which cities waterfront is put to best use?
Baltimore 7 8.33%
Boston 10 11.90%
Chicago 29 34.52%
Cleveland 1 1.19%
DC 0 0%
Detroit 1 1.19%
Honolulu 4 4.76%
Jacksonville 2 2.38%
L.A. 3 3.57%
Miami 5 5.95%
Milwaukee 3 3.57%
New Orleans 1 1.19%
NYC 2 2.38%
Pittsburgh 1 1.19%
Philly 1 1.19%
Tampa 1 1.19%
San Francisco 3 3.57%
Seattle 10 11.90%
Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-18-2019, 03:12 AM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,557 posts, read 2,355,282 times
Reputation: 3813

Advertisements

Simple, what downtowns put their waterfronts to best use?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-18-2019, 03:17 AM
 
2,041 posts, read 1,530,672 times
Reputation: 1420
Boston definitely. Baltimore I think does too. They're the most water oriented I think. Other cities are too but focus more on just the water front.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2019, 05:30 AM
 
Location: Maryland
4,675 posts, read 7,423,100 times
Reputation: 5379
Wish it were multiple choice: Chicago, Miami, Milwaukee, Baltimore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2019, 06:39 AM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,557 posts, read 2,355,282 times
Reputation: 3813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maintainschaos View Post
Wish it were multiple choice: Chicago, Miami, Milwaukee, Baltimore.
I forgot to add the option
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2019, 06:55 AM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,981,942 times
Reputation: 9229
I think it depends on how we're using the term "put to use". Boston historically has not been built up to the Harbor, and there has not been much to so ON the waterfront. The Aquarium and ICA, being the only two attractions of note on the downtown side of the waterfront.

Chicago scores high because the downtown lakefront is Soldier Field, the Museum Campus and a string of parks, leading up to a major tourist attraction in Navy Pier.

Pittsburgh, for all of its rivers, underachieves. The Stadiums, casino and Carnegie Science Center are on the river, but for the most part, our riverfronts are industrial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2019, 08:46 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
105 posts, read 95,070 times
Reputation: 169
I'm biased but I truly think Chicago's is the best of any city I've been to.

Pittsburgh, Milwaukee, and Cincinnati's are also good. Detroit and Indianapolis's are horribly underutilized.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2019, 09:11 AM
 
Location: North Caroline
467 posts, read 430,000 times
Reputation: 813
While not currently being used to its full potential, Tampa's waterfront will dramatically change with the megaproject Water Street Tampa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2019, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Cleveland and Columbus OH
11,076 posts, read 12,492,838 times
Reputation: 10420
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoNgFooCj View Post
Boston definitely. Baltimore I think does too. They're the most water oriented I think. Other cities are too but focus more on just the water front.
Boston? Really? Just wondering why you think that. I really am not that impressed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2019, 09:22 AM
 
Location: East Bay, San Francisco Bay Area
23,605 posts, read 24,145,795 times
Reputation: 24052
Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2019, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Providence, RI
12,930 posts, read 22,099,591 times
Reputation: 14171
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjimmy24 View Post
Boston? Really? Just wondering why you think that. I really am not that impressed.
I voted Baltimore. Tough to argue that the Inner Harbor isn't one of the best in the country at activating and integrating the downtown area with the waterfront. Chicago was my 1(a) and I could easily be swayed to rank it number 1.

That said, I think Boston's still in the discussion with the lengthy Harborwalk which is dotted with great pubic spaces. Especially if you include the Seaport/Ft. Point as part of the downtown area. But I think Columbus Park, Long Wharf, the Aquarium, Boston Harbor Hotel, etc. are among the better urban waterfront spaces in the country. Again, I'd still put Baltimore and Chicago above it and I think you could make cases for Seattle, San Francisco, Milwaukee, and even Pittsburgh; but Boston's definitely near the top of the class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top