Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-27-2019, 11:44 AM
 
724 posts, read 559,376 times
Reputation: 1040

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
LOL the more they hate, the more we rise...
I know you criticize the Bay too, but you know the old saying about wearing rose colored glasses, making all red flags look like flags?

There is something unsustainable about the real estate model that is going on out there. I'm not one to say that population growth is the be all, end all in economic sustenance, but there's no way that bus drivers or regular service workers should be making $100,000/year just to barely make rent. Usually, that's a sign of hyperinflation. Its great to have people on the top, but like I tell people all the time, not everyone can be a doctor, engineer, or lawyer. You need people to pick up the trash still, still need people to be police officers, etc. As much as SV tries to take away the human element from everything, you still need people as a fail safe mechanism.

That is something that should be addressed in a more responsible manner. Maybe it is, but it doesn't seem nearly fast enough.

This isn't only a Bay thing either. Its every single high cost metro area. Don't be like a lot of people I know and think the people "beneath" you are unnecessary. They have a purpose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-27-2019, 11:51 AM
 
3,733 posts, read 2,884,468 times
Reputation: 4908
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
LOL the more they hate, the more we rise...
Still not even in the "Most Influential" group, though. I don't hate SF, at all. I don't love it, as it's a mess, but I'm just tired of the constant one-up-man-ship. It's incessant. Not sure where all the pride comes from, as the city is a mess. I guess SF isn't one of the more influential cities, because, standing alone, it doesn't rise to the top.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2019, 11:53 AM
 
3,733 posts, read 2,884,468 times
Reputation: 4908
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Again, this^ has absolutely nothing to do with what I said:
The Bay Area has the 3rd largest economy but as far as relevance and importance, the Bay Area economy is probably 1st at this time...

Here are select areas by the number of companies HQed there among the 50 most valuable in the world as of 11/26/19

Bay Area: 12 of the Top 50 /$4.558 Trillion
$1174.3 Apple
$905.7 Google
$567.4 Facebook
$393.8 Visa
$260.9 Intel
$227.6 Wells Fargo
$222.7 Chevron
$192.2 Cisco
$185.5 Oracle
$149.0 Adobe
$142.5 Salesforce
$136.9 Netflix

New York: 9 of the Top 50:/ $2.231 Trillion
$413.0. JP Morgan Chase
$361.0 Johnson & Johnson
$288.6 Mastercard
$247.7 Verizon
$222.4 Merck
$211.9 Pfizer
$189.2 Pepsi
$164.7 Citigroup
$133.0 Bristol-Meyers Squibb

Chicago: 3 of the Top 50/ $507.4 Billion
$210.2 Boeing
$151.1 Abbott Laboratories
$146.1 McDonald's

Dallas: 2 of the Top 50/ $564.0 Billion
$290.8 Exxon Mobil
$273.2 AT&T

Los Angeles: 2 of the Top 50/ $412.6 Billion
$273.3 Walt Disney
$139.3 Amgen

https://www.dogsofthedow.com/largest...market-cap.htm

This is a perfect example of what Im talking about. The Bay Area has a larger presence in market capitalization than anywhere else in the world. It's staggering for such a small area. Is this written in stone? No but I never said it is.

But that supports my statement.
SO, is this the entire Bay area vs. cities proper?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2019, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,476,702 times
Reputation: 21228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enean View Post
SO, is this the entire Bay area vs. cities proper?
Nope these are all by CSA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2019, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,524 posts, read 2,314,811 times
Reputation: 3769
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enean View Post
SO, is this the entire Bay area vs. cities proper?
It's the entire bay area so combined CSA of San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland.

Idk why market cap is constantly emphasized when it has zero real world relevance to how important a company is to an economies day to day functionality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2019, 01:48 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
2,539 posts, read 2,310,407 times
Reputation: 2696
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trotlinda View Post
I think it should be more like this:

1. New York
2. Houston
3. Los Angeles
4. Phoenix
5. Chicago
6. Philadelphia
7. San Antonio
8. Dallas
9. San Diego
10. Nashville
11. Seattle
12. Boston
13. Honolulu
14. Columbus
15. Miami
This is a JOKE of a list.

Phoenix is one of the lowest GDP metros given its population of any major metro. And one of the most sprawling. Phoenix has few redeeming qualities in terms of being a world class city.

My list.

1. New York (No other city like NYC in the USA).
2. Washington, D.C (It is BOOMING. And only going to increase with Amazon)
3. Chicago (A legacy city that can hold its own)
4. San Fran (Tech)
5. Philadelphia (The underdog that is a powerhouse. Southeast Pennsylvania ranks in the top 5 metros in wealth)
6. L.A (Many housing problems that are going to hold it back due to its auto reliance and lack of urban infrastructure)
7. Boston (A stuttgart that will hold its own, but housing cost will prevent crazy development)
8. Seattle (The continued rising star)
9. Atlanta (The south's rising star)

From there

10. Miami
11. Dallas

The rest of the sunbelt is just suburbs. And places like OKC/Omaha. Are flyovers.

Even Nashville is way overrated. It has a downtown that is one strip for the most part. Its hype is well overrated. As well as Austin and Portland.

Last edited by rowhomecity; 11-27-2019 at 01:58 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2019, 02:06 PM
 
Location: Germantown, Philadelphia
14,147 posts, read 9,038,713 times
Reputation: 10491
Quote:
Originally Posted by rowhomecity View Post
Phoenix is one of the lowest GDP metros given its population of any major metro. And one of the most sprawling. Phoenix has few redeeming qualities in terms of being a world class city.
For a while in the 1990s, you could pick up copies of Phoenix's LGBT magazine, the (Arizona Community) Echo, in the bars in the Gayborhood.

I'm guessing they distributed them in Philly as a sort of marketing/promotional tool for Phoenix.

I remember perusing the ads in the Echo and remarking to myself that it seems that all everyone did down there was sell each other houses.

There were a fair number of real estate ads in PGN too, including a large one from the family-owned real estate agency that helped make Collingswood, N.J., cool, but there were ads for other types of businesses too: doctors, lawyers, boutiques, restaurants, clubs, you name it.

Suffice it to say that the Echo didn't sell me on Phoenix the way I think its publisher hoped it would.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2019, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,476,702 times
Reputation: 21228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joakim3 View Post
It's the entire bay area so combined CSA of San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland.

Idk why market cap is constantly emphasized when it has zero real world relevance to how important a company is to an economies day to day functionality.
Day to day functionality? Haha that's $4.5 Trillion in 401ks, retirement accts, mutual funds etc. Millions of people around the world are directly tied to the success or failure of those stocks.

The region has the largest concentration of the world's most recognized and valuable corporate brands...the very definition of relevance.

UK Financial Times World's Top 100 Corporate Brands:

Bay Area: 16 of the 100 Top Brands
#2 Apple
#3 Google
#5 Visa
#6 Facebook
#23 Wells Fargo
#26 Paypal
#34 Netflix
#36 Intel
#39 Youtube
#42 Cisco
#44 Instagram
#45 Adobe
#46 Salesforce
#50 Oracle
#53 Uber
#58 LinkedIn

New York: 9 of the 100 Top Brands
#11 Verizon
#12 Mastercard
#13 IBM
#33 American Express
#67 Chase
#73 JP Morgan
#77 Citi
#84 Colgate
#86 Subway

Seattle: 4 of the 100 Top Brands
#1 Amazon
#4 Microsoft
#24 Starbucks
#62 Costco

https://www.ft.com/content/3a3419f4-...acab#undefined

Now back to what I said:
The Bay Area has the 3rd largest economy but as far as relevance and importance, the Bay Area economy is probably 1st at this time...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2019, 03:54 PM
 
8,856 posts, read 6,846,043 times
Reputation: 8651
Brands show a facet of influence, but are only one of many indicators of overall economic importance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2019, 04:22 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
2,539 posts, read 2,310,407 times
Reputation: 2696
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Day to day functionality? Haha that's $4.5 Trillion in 401ks, retirement accts, mutual funds etc. Millions of people around the world are directly tied to the success or failure of those stocks.

The region has the largest concentration of the world's most recognized and valuable corporate brands...the very definition of relevance.

UK Financial Times World's Top 100 Corporate Brands:

Bay Area: 16 of the 100 Top Brands
#2 Apple
#3 Google
#5 Visa
#6 Facebook
#23 Wells Fargo
#26 Paypal
#34 Netflix
#36 Intel
#39 Youtube
#42 Cisco
#44 Instagram
#45 Adobe
#46 Salesforce
#50 Oracle
#53 Uber
#58 LinkedIn

New York: 9 of the 100 Top Brands
#11 Verizon
#12 Mastercard
#13 IBM
#33 American Express
#67 Chase
#73 JP Morgan
#77 Citi
#84 Colgate
#86 Subway

Seattle: 4 of the 100 Top Brands
#1 Amazon
#4 Microsoft
#24 Starbucks
#62 Costco

https://www.ft.com/content/3a3419f4-...acab#undefined

Now back to what I said:
The Bay Area has the 3rd largest economy but as far as relevance and importance, the Bay Area economy is probably 1st at this time...
You are being incredibly simplistic in your measure of economics with measuring only consumer facing brands. That is not how the economy works.

Philadelphia and San Fran are neck and neck as the same GDP respectively and NYC most certainly outranks SF.

SF is one of the most overrated cities in the USA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...n_areas_by_GDP
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top