Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Better foodie city?
San Francisco 48 80.00%
Boston 12 20.00%
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-11-2020, 02:27 PM
 
1,092 posts, read 1,503,403 times
Reputation: 822

Advertisements

Eh not even a fair comparison but then again the OP is a troll who's been headhunting his insecurities for Boston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-11-2020, 02:35 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,628 posts, read 12,733,519 times
Reputation: 11216
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
This isn’t even remotely close. Boston is much improved from foodie purgatory of 50 years ago but it’s not in the same league as San Francisco. Even seafood which should be world class given that the fish houses of New Bedford are 50 miles away is pretty mediocre. Part of it is access to fresh produce. Part is sheer money. Part is a far more multicultural and Asian-influenced population. It helps having a world class wine scene a day trip away. Microbreweries are everywhere these days so nobody can claim superiority.
Yea everyone keeps talking about seafood. I feel like for being where it is it barely even registers in Boston. I’m way more central to the food scene and culture here in Baltimore, which is also a better food city than Boston.

You could probably get good fresh lobster, oysters and chowder but it’s not a huge part of the food landscape. And there’s a ton of people who don’t like lobster, osmusters or New England chowder. You certainly don’t see many seafood restaurants in Roslindale or Jamaica Plain or Roxbury. Forget about the periphery of the city or the suburbs.

I see more fish markets and seafood wholesalers than restaurants in most areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2020, 02:58 PM
 
3,287 posts, read 2,020,885 times
Reputation: 9033
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBornMassMade View Post
Yea everyone keeps talking about seafood. I feel like for being where it is it barely even registers in Boston. I’m way more central to the food scene and culture here in Baltimore, which is also a better food city than Boston.

You could probably get good fresh lobster, oysters and chowder but it’s not a huge part of the food landscape. And there’s a ton of people who don’t like lobster, osmusters or New England chowder. You certainly don’t see many seafood restaurants in Roslindale or Jamaica Plain or Roxbury. Forget about the periphery of the city or the suburbs.

I see more fish markets and seafood wholesalers than restaurants in most areas.
I've often wondered about the whole "good seafood in Boston" thing. I'm 51 and spent the 1st 50% of my life there, BTW, and visit yearly.

For a looooong time, seafood in Boston usually meant fried baskets or baked haddock or cod with cracker crust. Or lobster. I'm exaggerating a little...and at my really young ages it's not like we're dining upscale anyway. Seeing a swordfish steak on a menu was a revelation.

Now there's nothing wrong with any of that, and damn, I still love me a hot plate of friend goodness at Woodman's every summer.

But I've grown to prefer pacific fish and the ways they're often prepared out here on the west coast.

Obviously it has changed a lot for the better in Boston since I left town, I get that, and I don't visit often enough to sample too many newer places.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2020, 04:08 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,628 posts, read 12,733,519 times
Reputation: 11216
Quote:
Originally Posted by KemBro71 View Post
I've often wondered about the whole "good seafood in Boston" thing. I'm 51 and spent the 1st 50% of my life there, BTW, and visit yearly.

For a looooong time, seafood in Boston usually meant fried baskets or baked haddock or cod with cracker crust. Or lobster. I'm exaggerating a little...and at my really young ages it's not like we're dining upscale anyway. Seeing a swordfish steak on a menu was a revelation.

Now there's nothing wrong with any of that, and damn, I still love me a hot plate of friend goodness at Woodman's every summer.

But I've grown to prefer pacific fish and the ways they're often prepared out here on the west coast.

Obviously it has changed a lot for the better in Boston since I left town, I get that, and I don't visit often enough to sample too many newer places.
Do you feel like seafood is prominent in daily life? do you think there are a lot of seafood restaurants in the Boston are?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2020, 04:43 PM
 
68 posts, read 40,125 times
Reputation: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by sprez33 View Post
How does this even get to be a serious question? Look at any ranking of the top foodie cities in the US and SF will be in the top 5 (often 1st or 2nd) whilst Boston doesn't make the list of the top 25. I'm in biotech and thus visit both cities often. There's a total difference in the food cultures in both cities. SF is very much a foodie culture whereas food in Boston is more of an after thought.
Why do you think this is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2020, 05:05 PM
 
1,393 posts, read 859,409 times
Reputation: 771
Quote:
Originally Posted by elchevere View Post
I still think some of you are greatly underestimating SF Italian cuisine:

4 SF Italian restaurants vs 1 Boston on Daily Meal top 50 US Italian restaurant list:

https://www.thedailymeal.com/eat/ame...llery/slide-50

Others:

https://www.gayot.com/restaurants/to...n-the-usa.html

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thr...nts-in-america


One area that Boston should not be hard to beat SF is steakhouses, though I cannot think of any of national significance off the top of my head.
I don’t think Boston wins this but on that daily meal review Boston’s scampo is 8...no way scampo is 8 nationally it is not best italian in Boston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2020, 05:06 PM
 
3,287 posts, read 2,020,885 times
Reputation: 9033
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBornMassMade View Post
Do you feel like seafood is prominent in daily life? do you think there are a lot of seafood restaurants in the Boston are?
Well I haven't lived there in 2 decades and only visit about 10-14 days per year.

And when I do I usually indulge in one fried platter (clams, scallops, etc.) from somewhere on the North Shore, and usually a dinner at The Causeway in Gloucester.

When I lived there, no, it wasn't daily. Probably for me at least since the preparation tended to be heavy.

I know things have changed quite a bit since then...and we have found seafood spots we like in Salem, for instance, that we really like.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2020, 05:10 PM
 
2,304 posts, read 1,709,693 times
Reputation: 2282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ne999 View Post
I don’t think Boston wins this but on that daily meal review Boston’s scampo is 8...no way scampo is 8 nationally it is not best italian in Boston.
Those lists are usually pretty worthless, from what I've found. I based my vote on my experience in both cities and I found the overall quality of the food in SF to be much higher.

That said, I hear people saying Boston isn't actually that great for seafood and overall it might not be, but the couple of places I've eaten it there have been very good, while SF's seafood is spottier than you'd expect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2020, 05:13 PM
 
1,393 posts, read 859,409 times
Reputation: 771
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent_Adultman View Post
Those lists are usually pretty worthless, from what I've found. I based my vote on my experience in both cities and I found the overall quality of the food in SF to be much higher.

That said, I hear people saying Boston isn't actually that great for seafood and overall it might not be, but the couple of places I've eaten it there have been very good, while SF's seafood is spottier than you'd expect.

Pretty subjective..San Fran will get consistently higher grades..Boston’s food scene has improved significantly...you definitely have to get out of the touristy areas and large numbers of the very good restaurants are actually in Cambridge and somerville..sarma in somerville is as good as anywhere I’ve been
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2020, 08:20 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,628 posts, read 12,733,519 times
Reputation: 11216
African American Chef Douglass Williams named one of the 10 best new chefs in America. He is owner and chef of MiDA in the South End of Boston

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/05/...chefs-america/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top