Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city/metro is more naturally beautiful?
Boston 12 35.29%
Portland, ME 22 64.71%
Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-15-2020, 02:09 PM
 
136 posts, read 133,478 times
Reputation: 141

Advertisements

Though one city dwarfs the other in population and recognition, both are forces to be reckoned with when it comes to natural beauty.

From Boston's fantastic trails and iconic harbor to Portland's stunning coastline, which city/metro better deserves to be called the scenic crown jewel of the far northeastern U.S.?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-15-2020, 02:52 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,157 posts, read 7,980,515 times
Reputation: 10123
Portland Maine is pretty unbeatable.

Boston is probably the most beautiful LARGE city in the Northeast (Over 250k), but Portland ME is probably one of the prettiest medium-sized cities (~50k-250k). Portland reminds me of a smaller Boston, but definitely more naturally beautiful. Besides, Maine's coastline is gorgeous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2020, 07:27 AM
 
2,440 posts, read 4,833,620 times
Reputation: 3072
Really? Portland is nice but it's no Boston. No one is taking photos of Portland from the harbor or from across Portland's back cove. Boston filled its Back Bay to create one of the most beautiful urban districts in the country. Portland's back cove is still a cove with a highway along it. There's no public garden or common in Portland. Casco Bay is beautiful but that's not Portland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2020, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Providence, RI
12,825 posts, read 21,993,461 times
Reputation: 14129
Quote:
Originally Posted by missionhill View Post
Really? Portland is nice but it's no Boston. No one is taking photos of Portland from the harbor or from across Portland's back cove. Boston filled its Back Bay to create one of the most beautiful urban districts in the country. Portland's back cove is still a cove with a highway along it. There's no public garden or common in Portland. Casco Bay is beautiful but that's not Portland.
I agree with you, Portland is not as pretty of a city as Boston. But this is about natural scenery. In that case, I think Portland wins. It's a prettier natural setting. but the gap isn't that big. There are parts of the Boston metro (i.e. Cape Ann) that rival the Portland area's prettiest spots. But Portland has more widespread natural beauty.

Naturally speaking, I think Burlington Vermont is the prettiest city in New England by a solid margin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2020, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Medfid
6,804 posts, read 6,027,453 times
Reputation: 5242
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrfox View Post
I agree with you, Portland is not as pretty of a city as Boston. But this is about natural scenery. In that case, I think Portland wins. It's a prettier natural setting.
I dunno. Casco Bay is nice and all, but the Boston Harbor and the River Basin are no slouches for natural beauty either. And especially if we’re just comparing city propers, Boston has far nicer inland parks. Portland has no answer to the Fens or the Arboretum.

For anyone that doesn’t know the city very well, here’s a photo I took in the Fens around 2 weeks ago (specifically from the Victory Gardens):

Last edited by Boston Shudra; 06-16-2020 at 09:33 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2020, 09:53 PM
 
Location: SLC > DC
503 posts, read 799,472 times
Reputation: 538
They look the same to me. I've never been to either but I'd go with Boston
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2020, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Providence, RI
12,825 posts, read 21,993,461 times
Reputation: 14129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boston Shudra View Post
I dunno. Casco Bay is nice and all, but the Boston Harbor and the River Basin are no slouches for natural beauty either. And especially if we’re just comparing city propers, Boston has far nicer inland parks. Portland has no answer to the Fens or the Arboretum.

For anyone that doesn’t know the city very well, here’s a photo I took in the Fens around 2 weeks ago (specifically from the Victory Gardens):
Boston has better urban parks without a doubt. Frankly, I think the built environment in Boston is infinitely better than Portland which isn't particularly attractive outside of the small footprint of the downtown area. But Portland is much smaller and sparsely developed natural scenery exists within and just outside the city limits. For example, this is in the city of Portland. This is 10 minutes from downtown. This is only about 15 minutes from downtown. There are places on Cape Ann that are comparably beautiful, the Harbor Islands are wonderful, and Boston has great access to Cape Cod and beyond. But it doesn't have nearly as much that's so beautiful, so accessible, and so close to the city center. Boston's a very pretty major city. But it can't compete with Portland on the natural beauty front. If you wanted to talk built environment, Boston wins easily. If you want to talk a combination of natural beauty and built environment, I'd also give it to Boston. But purely in terms of natural beauty, I have a hard time saying that Boston is better. Having lived in both, there's no question that there's a lot more natural beauty close in to the center of Portland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2020, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Medfid
6,804 posts, read 6,027,453 times
Reputation: 5242
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrfox View Post
But it can't compete with Portland on the natural beauty front.
I still think you’re underselling Boston’s natural beauty.

https://flic.kr/p/2hfQMf8
https://flic.kr/p/qnvNM1
https://flic.kr/p/W6pRGD
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2020, 02:04 PM
 
Location: Providence, RI
12,825 posts, read 21,993,461 times
Reputation: 14129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boston Shudra View Post
I still think you’re underselling Boston’s natural beauty.

https://flic.kr/p/2hfQMf8
https://flic.kr/p/qnvNM1
https://flic.kr/p/W6pRGD
I think you're conflating natural beauty and overall beauty. Of those photos, only one is real natural beauty (and those islands are not exactly easily visible or accessible for most Bostonians). The Back Bay skyline is a great vista because of the towers soaring over the river. Without the buildings, it's a pretty standard river. And even with the artsy black and white touch, it's hard to compare the Fens with Casco Bay and the rugged Maine Coast. Hell, you can even see the White Mountains from Portland. I'll take Mt. Washington over Great Blue Hill, wouldn't you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2020, 03:38 PM
 
Location: Medfid
6,804 posts, read 6,027,453 times
Reputation: 5242
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrfox View Post
I think you're conflating natural beauty and overall beauty. Of those photos, only one is real natural beauty (and those islands are not exactly easily visible or accessible for most Bostonians). The Back Bay skyline is a great vista because of the towers soaring over the river. Without the buildings, it's a pretty standard river. And even with the artsy black and white touch, it's hard to compare the Fens with Casco Bay and the rugged Maine Coast.
Is the Charles River Basin technically a lake? Either way, I do think it would still be a stunning, natural feature even without the skyscrapers in the background. If anything, the [largely fugly] back bay towers detract from the basin’s beauty more than they add to it.

And you were the one who brought up lighthouses in the first place. It’s not like Portland Head is so much more accessible from downtown than Boston Light.

The Fens and Casco Bay definitely aren’t equivalent. While there are some swamps and marshes in Portland, I don’t think the city has turned any into a park. Maybe the Back Cove is the closest thing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top