Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which Midwestern metro is most scenic?
Chicago, IL 15 14.42%
Cincinnati, OH 27 25.96%
Cleveland, OH 8 7.69%
Des Moines, IA 2 1.92%
Detroit, MI 1 0.96%
Grand Rapids, MI 8 7.69%
Kansas City, MO 5 4.81%
Madison, WI 15 14.42%
Milwaukee, WI 5 4.81%
Minneapolis, MN 18 17.31%
Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-27-2021, 01:58 PM
 
Location: St. Louis
685 posts, read 766,977 times
Reputation: 879

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GraniteStater View Post
Duluth, MN obviously, it should have been listed.
Agreed. Duluth would also be my pick.

Chicago's strength is Lake Michigan. Their coastline is phenomenal. The beaches, the blue water, the waterfront trails, the endless skyline along the lakeshore. In a way, it reminds me of a northern Miami.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-27-2021, 07:33 PM
 
994 posts, read 779,427 times
Reputation: 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by nadnerb View Post
Indiana Dunes isn't terribly impressive, though. I think most people agree that it should not have been upgraded to National Park status. Cuyahoga Valley is the same way. I'm sure there are several other areas in the Midwest that are more scenic than these two NPs.
Yeah because who needs 50 square miles of hills, rivers and ravines between two major urban areas. Would be way better as miles of 1/2 acre exurban subdivisions.

I'd argue the CVNP has more of an impact than any of the huge western national parks that were already in places that never were going to be big human population centers.

Last edited by ClevelandBrown; 12-27-2021 at 07:41 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2021, 08:47 PM
 
1,320 posts, read 865,054 times
Reputation: 2796
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClevelandBrown View Post
Yeah because who needs 50 square miles of hills, rivers and ravines between two major urban areas. Would be way better as miles of 1/2 acre exurban subdivisions.

I'd argue the CVNP has more of an impact than any of the huge western national parks that were already in places that never were going to be big human population centers.
I'm not saying the land shouldn't be protected, it was previously a National Recreation Area which is fine, and I think the history behind why it was preserved is interesting. I just don't think it should have been upgraded to National Park status, a special designation that only 62 other areas have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2021, 06:16 PM
 
4,520 posts, read 5,093,240 times
Reputation: 4839
Cleveland.

Yes, the Cuyahoga Valley National Park is great and adds a ton to Greater Cleveland, but there's so much more both within the City and nearby (w/in Cuyahoga County) such as these:

Chagrin River Road w/in the Chagrin Valley to the east:

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4762...8i8192!5m1!1e2

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4965...8i8192!5m1!1e2

... the Road meets the River:
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.5090...8i6656!5m1!1e2

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.5167...8i6656!5m1!1e2

... just off CRR but still in the C. Valley:
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.5174...8i8192!5m1!1e2

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.5293...7i16384!8i8192

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.5190...8i8192!5m1!1e2

... and Chagrin Falls (city/suburb) itself... why not?

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4313...7i16384!8i8192

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4312...7i16384!8i8192

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4310...!7i8704!8i4352

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4310...!7i8704!8i4352



Brookside Park (home of the Cleveland Zoo) within the City of Cleveland:

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4440...8i8192!5m1!1e2

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4455...8i8192!5m1!1e2

... Zoo's Main Entrance:
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4468...8i8192!5m1!1e2

Rocky River Reservation... (in Lakewood, a close-in suburb immediately to the west):

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4799...8i8192!5m1!1e2

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4817...8i4352!5m1!1e2

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4800...8i8192!5m1!1e2

... and Rocky River Res. within the City of Cleveland:

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4607...8i8192!5m1!1e2

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4601...8i8192!5m1!1e2

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4778...8i6656!5m1!1e2

Edgewater Beach -- Cleveland city; 2.5 miles east of downtown:

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4898...8i8192!5m1!1e2

(the same; Lakewood Gold Coast in the distance):

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4921...8i8192!5m1!1e2

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4873...8i2736!5m1!1e2

... OK, some Cleveland roads suck (blame the radical temp swings), although the houses are nice:
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4885...8i8192!5m1!1e2

Industrial, but not totally bespoiled my mankind:
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4844...8i8192!5m1!1e2

... the condos are coming, the condos are coming!
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4815...8i8192!5m1!1e2

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4840...8i8192!5m1!1e2

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4840...8i8192!5m1!1e2

Valley View (a few miles north of CVLP btw):
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4106...8i6656!5m1!1e2


https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4149...8i8192!5m1!1e2


... and OK, yeah these:

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.5105...8i8192!5m1!1e2

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.5100...8i4352!5m1!1e2

Last edited by TheProf; 12-28-2021 at 07:20 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2021, 06:19 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
1,912 posts, read 2,088,385 times
Reputation: 4048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gfitz1010 View Post
Aren’t the lakes around Madison much larger than the ones in Minneapolis though?
Lake Mendota and Lake Monona are relatively large, but they're not particularly scenic (though I do agree they're a very nice asset to have). There are a hundred different lakes in the Twin Cities area that look exactly the same and many are much larger. I don't think there's really anything in the urbanized Midwest that's comparable to the Lake Minnetonka area, for instance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2021, 08:08 PM
 
47 posts, read 29,197 times
Reputation: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by jennifat View Post
I don't think there's really anything in the urbanized Midwest that's comparable to the Lake Minnetonka area, for instance.
There isn’t.

And when combined with the other lakes, creeks, rivers, waterfalls, rolling topography, river gorges, a National Recreation Area that splits Mpls and STP, along with what is widely regarded as the Midwests finest park systems, it makes for an impressive and uniquely scenic metro area. Especially with 4 distinct seasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2021, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Boilermaker Territory
26,404 posts, read 46,555,846 times
Reputation: 19539
Quote:
Originally Posted by windchill View Post
There isn’t.

And when combined with the other lakes, creeks, rivers, waterfalls, rolling topography, river gorges, a National Recreation Area that splits Mpls and STP, along with what is widely regarded as the Midwests finest park systems, it makes for an impressive and uniquely scenic metro area. Especially with 4 distinct seasons.
The only other Midwest metro area that has a higher concentration of lakes is Oakland County, MI (Metro Detroit). The highest concentration is West Bloomfield Township, Bloomfield Township, Sylvan Lake, Orchard Lake Village, and Waterford Township areas. These are all mostly very high income areas with extensive conservation lands, trails, and parks around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2021, 04:27 PM
 
16,690 posts, read 29,506,412 times
Reputation: 7665
Cincy. Then Minne.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2021, 09:12 PM
 
1,636 posts, read 2,141,754 times
Reputation: 1832
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraniteStater View Post
The only other Midwest metro area that has a higher concentration of lakes is Oakland County, MI (Metro Detroit). The highest concentration is West Bloomfield Township, Bloomfield Township, Sylvan Lake, Orchard Lake Village, and Waterford Township areas. These are all mostly very high income areas with extensive conservation lands, trails, and parks around.
The eastern suburbs of Detroit rest on Lake St. Clair which is 440 square miles and the 15th largest lake shared by Michigan and Ontario.

You mentioned Oakland County which has 350 lakes or so. It has hills around them and it looks like the English countryside. Not to mention - the area has an expansive footprint of upscale housing for miles and miles.

However, since the people in the area live in a scenic state, their frame of reference for beauty is the other parts of Michigan. Meaning, people here look at the lakes in the northwestern suburbs of Detroit as just a drop in the bucket compared to the rest of Michigan. As such, nobody from Detroit would clamor around the region being very scenic as their standards and perceptions of scenic beauty is skewed due to the UP, West Coast of Michigan, and Grand Traverse Bay which they wouldn't trade it in for anything mentioned in this thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2021, 05:43 AM
 
Location: Boilermaker Territory
26,404 posts, read 46,555,846 times
Reputation: 19539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Republic of Michigan View Post
The eastern suburbs of Detroit rest on Lake St. Clair which is 440 square miles and the 15th largest lake shared by Michigan and Ontario.

You mentioned Oakland County which has 350 lakes or so. It has hills around them and it looks like the English countryside. Not to mention - the area has an expansive footprint of upscale housing for miles and miles.

However, since the people in the area live in a scenic state, their frame of reference for beauty is the other parts of Michigan. Meaning, people here look at the lakes in the northwestern suburbs of Detroit as just a drop in the bucket compared to the rest of Michigan. As such, nobody from Detroit would clamor around the region being very scenic as their standards and perceptions of scenic beauty is skewed due to the UP, West Coast of Michigan, and Grand Traverse Bay which they wouldn't trade it in for anything mentioned in this thread.
Correct, I've been to most of the northern Michigan and the UP, much nicer lakes. However, you can't find any naturally occurring lakes further south of the Great Lakes region metro areas in the Midwest as they are all inferior reservoirs with a limited lifespan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top