Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Most naturally beautiful metro?
Baltimore, MD 0 0%
Boston, MA 18 25.35%
Hartford, CT 0 0%
New York City, NY 10 14.08%
Philadelphia, PA 4 5.63%
Pittsburgh, PA 27 38.03%
Providence, RI 3 4.23%
Richmond, VA 3 4.23%
Washington, DC 5 7.04%
Other 1 1.41%
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-02-2022, 11:13 AM
 
21,618 posts, read 31,189,915 times
Reputation: 9775

Advertisements

Richmond is not a Northeastern Metro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-02-2022, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Boston Metrowest (via the Philly area)
7,269 posts, read 10,588,790 times
Reputation: 8823
Quote:
Originally Posted by masssachoicetts View Post
Lots.
1. White sand beaches on water
2. Stunning cliff side beaches.
3. Rocky New England coast.
4. Lakes surrounded by the beauty of hills and mountains.
5. Rivers, streams and brooks.
6. Bay inlets.

Atleast 6.
There are no true mountains in metro Boston. We both know that.

I know there are some different coastal features; that's not what my point was.

But by and large, the coast is the coast and the beach is the beach in the vast majority of cases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2022, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Germantown, Philadelphia
14,155 posts, read 9,047,788 times
Reputation: 10496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duderino View Post
There are no true mountains in metro Boston. We both know that.
True, but there are some noteworthy hills.

The highest point in Philadelphia is 442 feet above sea level, in Chestnut Hill. The hill in Roxborough that houses the transmission towers for several Philadelphia TV and radio stations is about 320 feet high.

Public TV station WGBH in Boston gets its call letters because its transmitter was (and probably still is) situated atop the Great Blue Hill. At 635 feet, it's higher than any of the hills in or near Philadelphia.*

Blue Hills Reservation | Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation

*The hill in Reading that has the Pagoda near its summit, however, rises some 620 feet above the level of the city and 886 feet above sea level. Reading is in Philadelphia's CSA but not its MSA. The Great Blue Hill, OTOH, lies in Milton, a suburb that touches Boston's southern city limit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2022, 01:45 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,159 posts, read 7,985,265 times
Reputation: 10123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duderino View Post
There are no true mountains in metro Boston. We both know that.

I know there are some different coastal features; that's not what my point was.

But by and large, the coast is the coast and the beach is the beach in the vast majority of cases.
we arent talking about that? You are deflecting from your oceanic point.

None of the Northeast Metropolitan Areas have 'true mountains'. That is silly to assume.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2022, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Boston Metrowest (via the Philly area)
7,269 posts, read 10,588,790 times
Reputation: 8823
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarketStEl View Post
True, but there are some noteworthy hills.

The highest point in Philadelphia is 442 feet above sea level, in Chestnut Hill. The hill in Roxborough that houses the transmission towers for several Philadelphia TV and radio stations is about 320 feet high.

Public TV station WGBH in Boston gets its call letters because its transmitter was (and probably still is) situated atop the Great Blue Hill. At 635 feet, it's higher than any of the hills in or near Philadelphia.*

Blue Hills Reservation | Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation

*The hill in Reading that has the Pagoda near its summit, however, rises some 620 feet above the level of the city and 886 feet above sea level. Reading is in Philadelphia's CSA but not its MSA. The Great Blue Hill, OTOH, lies in Milton, a suburb that touches Boston's southern city limit.
Interesting facts; thanks for sharing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by masssachoicetts View Post
we arent talking about that? You are deflecting from your oceanic point.

None of the Northeast Metropolitan Areas have 'true mountains'. That is silly to assume.
I honestly wasn't trying to deflect anything. You brought up mountains as an example of a metro Boston natural feature; I was merely just pointing out a fact that the coastal Northeast isn't exactly prime mountain territory.

I acknowledged that there are some different natural features along the metro Boston coast, but my overall point is that its immediate coastal scenery is overwhelmingly similar. I didn't think that was such an out of line observation to make.

That's not to say it's not scenic--it certainly is. But it's just not super different aesthetically from coastal town/city to coastal town/city within the metro.

Again, that was in response to another poster saying that "Pittsburgh's hills all look the same," but I was countering that coastal areas really could be analyzed in similar fashion. That's literally it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2022, 06:59 PM
 
2,814 posts, read 2,279,917 times
Reputation: 3717
It isn't listed as option. But, Rochester, NY has an argument. It lacks an ocean or mountains. But, you get the big water setting of a Great Lakes city with more topographic variety than you find in the flatter cities. The city has a large gorge with waterfalls, sand beaches and rolling hills within the city. In the MSA, with in an hour of the city you have Great Lakes shorelines, a glacial lake district and massive hills/gorges.

Here is a video that focuses showcases the rivers, gorge and waterfalls, the lakefront and the greenery/hills of a relatively compact city of 36 sq miles.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FG9srmZlyY


Within an hour the city there are lakes, beaches/bluffs, gorges, waterfalls and hills and valleys.

https://youtu.be/3IZcGKSr2EY

The Finger Lakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjgXcAlgAY4&t=27s
The massive hills for skiing/hiking

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0388GcCJXaY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7Kr9YEatR8


Then you have beaches and bluffs along Lake Ontario:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0jxGFP6iKM&t=2s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVITM1wAkx0&t=108s
Chimney Bluffs:

https://youtu.be/WNR4wFWy4b0[/quote]

Last edited by jpdivola; 01-02-2022 at 07:13 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top