Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 04-09-2022, 04:28 PM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,547,924 times
Reputation: 5785

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boston Shudra View Post
Might not be above 100, but can you check to see what Cambridge has?
I checked before I posted the OP. Cambridge, MA is at 82. Some others were very close like Alexandria, VA at 97, and Myrtle Beach, SC with 97 also.

Cambridge however is full of buildings in general. So the 165 low rise buildings going up to roughly 11 floors, mix in with the 82 high rises (12 floors and up) to complete the city's urbanity, and it's done in only 7 sq mi.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2022, 08:32 PM
 
2,744 posts, read 6,107,813 times
Reputation: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by the resident09 View Post
By what standard are you referring to mid to high rises? That's probably the discrepancy. Buildings 12 floors and higher Austin, Charlotte, and Nashville have more total in their city proper than SA.

I counted all existing buildings 10 floors plus and wrote everything down for these three cities. San Antonio has 200 the other cities around 140-150. I included 9 floor buildings as well since some were about the same height as a 10 story building as far as feet but had one less floor. I didn't go less than 9 floors.

Last edited by SweethomeSanAntonio; 04-09-2022 at 08:41 PM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2022, 12:46 AM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,727,826 times
Reputation: 17393
Quote:
Originally Posted by the resident09 View Post
The list is by city proper, all cities with at least 100 high-rises:

New York City: 6,786 buildings (300 sq mi)
Chicago: 1,404 buildings (234 sq mi)

Los Angeles: 668 buildings (469 sq mi)
Houston, TX: 591 buildings (640 sq mi)
Washington D.C.: 503 buildings (61 sq mi)
Philadelphia: 475 buildings (134 sq mi)
San Francisco: 455 buildings (46 sq mi)
Honolulu: 443 buildings (102 sq mi)
Miami, FL: 443 buildings (36 sq mi)

Boston: 374 buildings (48 sq mi)
Dallas, TX: 347 buildings (385 sq mi)
Atlanta, GA: 337 buildings (132 sq mi)
Seattle: 321 buildings (83 sq mi)
Minneapolis: 295 buildings (55 sq mi)
Arlington, VA: 292 buildings (28 sq mi)
Denver: 283 buildings (154 sq mi)
Detroit: 248 buildings (139 sq mi)
St. Louis, Missouri: 247 buildings (62 sq mi)
Fort Lauderdale, FL: 240 buildings (31 sq mi)
Austin: 230 buildings (319 sq mi)
Baltimore: 218 buildings (81 sq mi)
San Diego: 212 buildings (325 sq mi)

Nashville: 190 buildings (504 sq mi)
Portland: 189 buildings (133 sq mi)
Kansas City: 186 buildings (314 sq mi)
Miami Beach, FL: 177 buildings (7 sq mi)
Jersey City, NJ: 176 buildings (15 sq mi)
Newark, NJ: 172 buildings (24 sq mi)
Pittsburgh: 172 buildings (56 sq mi)
Tampa, FL: 161 buildings (108 sq mi)
Cincinnati, OH: 168 buildings (78 sq mi)
Cleveland, OH: 164 buildings (77 sq mi)
Milwaukee: 163 buildings (96 sq mi)
Orlando: 163 buildings (67 sq mi)
Indianapolis: 161 buildings (361 sq mi)
Charlotte, NC: 158 buildings (307 sq mi)
Las Vegas, NV: 141 buildings (131 sq mi)
New Orleans: 129 buildings (181 sq mi)
Phoenix: 119 buildings (518 sq mi)
San Antonio, TX: 113 buildings (333 sq mi)
West Palm Beach, FL: 107 buildings (49 sq mi)
Oakland, CA: 104 buildings (56 sq mi)
Columbus, OH: 100 buildings (220 sq mi)

Here's the number of highrises per square mile in each city above:


25.29 Miami Beach
22.62 New York
12.31 Miami
11.73 Jersey City
10.42 Arlington
9.89 San Francisco
8.25 Washington DC
7.79 Boston
7.74 Ft. Lauderdale
7.17 Newark

6.00 Chicago
5.36 Minneapolis
4.34 Honolulu
3.98 St. Louis
3.87 Seattle
3.54 Philadelphia
3.07 Pittsburgh
2.69 Baltimore
2.55 Atlanta
2.43 Orlando

2.18 West Palm Beach
2.15 Cincinnati
2.13 Cleveland
1.86 Oakland
1.84 Denver
1.78 Detroit
1.70 Milwaukee
1.49 Tampa
1.42 Los Angeles
1.42 Portland

1.08 Las Vegas
0.92 Houston
0.90 Dallas
0.72 Austin
0.71 New Orleans
0.65 San Diego
0.59 Kansas City
0.51 Charlotte
0.45 Columbus
0.45 Indianapolis

0.38 Nashville
0.34 San Antonio
0.23 Phoenix


Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2022, 01:26 AM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,507 posts, read 26,285,643 times
Reputation: 13288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craziaskowboi View Post
Here's the number of highrises per square mile in each city above:


25.29 Miami Beach
22.62 New York
12.31 Miami
11.73 Jersey City
10.42 Arlington
9.89 San Francisco
8.25 Washington DC
7.79 Boston
7.74 Ft. Lauderdale
7.17 Newark

6.00 Chicago
5.36 Minneapolis
4.34 Honolulu
3.98 St. Louis
3.87 Seattle
3.54 Philadelphia
3.07 Pittsburgh
2.69 Baltimore
2.55 Atlanta
2.43 Orlando

2.18 West Palm Beach
2.15 Cincinnati
2.13 Cleveland
1.86 Oakland
1.84 Denver
1.78 Detroit
1.70 Milwaukee
1.49 Tampa
1.42 Los Angeles
1.42 Portland

1.08 Las Vegas
0.92 Houston
0.90 Dallas
0.72 Austin
0.71 New Orleans
0.65 San Diego
0.59 Kansas City
0.51 Charlotte
0.45 Columbus
0.45 Indianapolis

0.38 Nashville
0.34 San Antonio
0.23 Phoenix


New Orleans moves up to 1.20 if you remove the 35 sq mi in the Bayou Sauvage National Wildlife Refuge.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2022, 04:35 AM
 
Location: Germantown, Philadelphia
14,147 posts, read 9,038,713 times
Reputation: 10491
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
So what would you call these? If they aren't high-rise, what are they?

The Stacks DC Rendering 1

The Stacks DC Rendering 2

The Stacks DC Rendering 3
I'd call them sexy buildings too — they rise above the glass box or the concrete-frame pancake stack. But to your point, I'd also call them high-rises, save for the eight-story building on the right in rendering 2 that brings the difference between "high rise" and "not high rise" home.

DC has often been compared to Paris because of its low building height limit, but these buildings — and many others in the national capital — demonstrate that DC's height limit is still more generous than Paris', where you simply do not see any buildings with more than five or six floors (about the point where you'd need to put in an elevator).

But what these renderings also show is that you can get a canyon effect with not-so-tall buildings like these. You usually don't feel like you are in a canyon walking on most streets in the District because many of the taller buildings are on the avenues, which are broad. But put them on a narrower street, as here, and voila! Apartment canyons.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2022, 04:58 AM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,547,924 times
Reputation: 5785
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarketStEl View Post
I'd call them sexy buildings too — they rise above the glass box or the concrete-frame pancake stack. But to your point, I'd also call them high-rises, save for the eight-story building on the right in rendering 2 that brings the difference between "high rise" and "not high rise" home.

DC has often been compared to Paris because of its low building height limit, but these buildings — and many others in the national capital — demonstrate that DC's height limit is still more generous than Paris', where you simply do not see any buildings with more than five or six floors (about the point where you'd need to put in an elevator).

But what these renderings also show is that you can get a canyon effect with not-so-tall buildings like these. You usually don't feel like you are in a canyon walking on most streets in the District because many of the taller buildings are on the avenues, which are broad. But put them on a narrower street, as here, and voila! Apartment canyons.
Agreed with all of this here. There are parts of DC where the streets are too wide to give off an urban canyon feel like 16th street, or Constitution and Independence Avenues etc. But with the right building placement on the right street you certainly can create a "canyon" effect in 14/15 stories albeit a shorter one.

For what it's worth, I'd also call the buildings in the renderings "tall" buildings. I know that's a head scratcher for some who believe only a skyscraper can be considered tall. No. Skyscrapers are "taller" buildings and/ or supertall. But anything 12-15 stories is certainly not "short" and not even mid rise.They are high rise, just at the beginning of that measurement.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top