Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-04-2023, 04:42 PM
 
372 posts, read 203,090 times
Reputation: 457

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpomp View Post
I too know successful people who have relocated from the Northeast to Chicago and love it.

The idea of not knowing someone who moved to X city, therefore it is less relevant is one of my annoyances of City Data.

And agree, Chicago has more competition these days, but it's still one of the top alpha cities no matter how you slice it.



And the John Hughes era movies in the 80s/early 90s. That added to the wholesome (and usually white/wealthy) image of Chicago, lol.

John Hughes movies...loved them!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-04-2023, 05:25 PM
 
Location: Terramaria
1,801 posts, read 1,949,479 times
Reputation: 2690
The OP's hometown, Rochester, should be under the "faded" category, given that Xerox and Kodak were once industrial giants. Buffalo may have been slowly fading in the long run, but its actually attempting to bring its image back in at least the medium run, partly coming at the expense of Rochester.

Meanwhile, under the "grown" category, I'd place Orlando on there, and with the Brightline about to open, its role as a connector to much of the rest of FL will only continue to thrive, and there's even talks of a potential fifth WDW park set to open. Its come along way from being "home to Disney" back in the '70s/'80s.

Surprise nobody has said Las Vegas yet with the booming brethren, which like Orlando and theme parks, is so much more than just casinos nowadays, with the biggies being the arrival of more pro sports, with a MLB franchise coming soon. On the contrary, Atlantic City continues to lose its relevance, which can trace its decline back to the days of the boom in air travel despite a comeback attempt in the 1980s, with even the Miss America Pageant leaving town (itself losing relevance despite moving the other locations in recent years).

Among a couple of Plains cities, OKC seems to be gaining (mostly due to DFW spillover) and Wichita seems to be declining.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2023, 05:41 PM
 
Location: Omaha, Ne
561 posts, read 513,683 times
Reputation: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borntoolate85 View Post
Among a couple of Plains cities, OKC seems to be gaining (mostly due to DFW spillover) and Wichita seems to be declining.
Omaha has entered the “Great Plains cities gaining” discussion.. Des Moines too…

Last edited by Mighty Joe Young; 05-04-2023 at 05:53 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2023, 06:04 PM
 
37,875 posts, read 41,904,687 times
Reputation: 27266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Grown:
Charlotte, Nashville, DC, Austin, Denver, Huntsville

These cities continue to rise in prominence. I like that they offer a high quality of life and things to do.

Faded:
Atlanta, New Orleans, Memphis, St. Louis, San Francisco, Portland

For me the faded cities have lost their luster. Crime, run down areas, low vibrations feeling, congested etc. have kept them from being relevant to me.
So you actually believe Atlanta is less relevant today than it was when you were a kid?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2023, 06:10 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,288,860 times
Reputation: 13293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Grown:
Charlotte, Nashville, DC, Austin, Denver, Huntsville

These cities continue to rise in prominence. I like that they offer a high quality of life and things to do.

Faded:
Atlanta, New Orleans, Memphis, St. Louis, San Francisco, Portland

For me the faded cities have lost their luster. Crime, run down areas, low vibrations feeling, congested etc. have kept them from being relevant to me.
How has Portland declined? Seems a huge stretch to say it isn't relevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2023, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
2,991 posts, read 3,418,154 times
Reputation: 4944
Problem with Chicago is the natural amenities outside of Lake Michigan is the absolute pits. It’s still a great city but a lot of the younger professional class enjoy hiking and skiing and it’s really hard to do both in Chicago. I don’t think crime is the real answer as there are many places to live in Chicago not even counting the suburbs where your risks of being a victim of crime is incredibly low.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2023, 06:15 PM
 
Location: ATL via ROC
1,213 posts, read 2,321,770 times
Reputation: 2563
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBears02 View Post
Atlanta? I don’t really see it as fading. It’s growing rapidly and lots of good things are happening for the city.
I could see an argument for Atlanta peaking around 2010. I don't feel that it has declined at all (trust me, the metro is still booming with zero signs of slowing down), however I only arrived a few years ago. Some lifelong residents have expressed to me that the city is becoming more corporate and losing its identity, which was arguably the foremost influencer of American pop culture in the 2000s. That being said, a growing corporate presence could be one measure of relevance so I'm not sure it's less "relevant" in any way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Borntoolate85 View Post
The OP's hometown, Rochester, should be under the "faded" category, given that Xerox and Kodak were once industrial giants. Buffalo may have been slowly fading in the long run, but its actually attempting to bring its image back in at least the medium run, partly coming at the expense of Rochester.

Meanwhile, under the "grown" category, I'd place Orlando on there, and with the Brightline about to open, its role as a connector to much of the rest of FL will only continue to thrive, and there's even talks of a potential fifth WDW park set to open. Its come along way from being "home to Disney" back in the '70s/'80s.

Surprise nobody has said Las Vegas yet with the booming brethren, which like Orlando and theme parks, is so much more than just casinos nowadays, with the biggies being the arrival of more pro sports, with a MLB franchise coming soon. On the contrary, Atlantic City continues to lose its relevance, which can trace its decline back to the days of the boom in air travel despite a comeback attempt in the 1980s, with even the Miss America Pageant leaving town (itself losing relevance despite moving the other locations in recent years).

Among a couple of Plains cities, OKC seems to be gaining (mostly due to DFW spillover) and Wichita seems to be declining.
Solid take. I have felt Rochester was always below Buffalo in relevance (due to name recognition and sports), but the corporate giants kept the city afloat as an oasis in the Rust Belt for many years. When I was younger people talked about Rochester with more reverence, there was a sense of importance and "big city" vision. These days I go back and people talk down on the city or act like it's a small town. Even the leadership seems to have a provincial mindset/outlook. Rochester actually blew a unique opportunity to reinvent itself in the mid-2000s to early-2010s when the economy was the 2nd largest in New York State and metro population was growing fastest in Upstate New York, but Buffalo has leapfrogged that progress and regained it's ground as the #2 while offering better urban amenities and lower crime.

Las Vegas is a great pick for growing relevance. The expansion team boom is highly impressive. What was once a vacation destination in the desert has now become a major city in its own right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2023, 06:20 PM
 
372 posts, read 203,090 times
Reputation: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guineas View Post
Problem with Chicago is the natural amenities outside of Lake Michigan is the absolute pits. It’s still a great city but a lot of the younger professional class enjoy hiking and skiing and it’s really hard to do both in Chicago. I don’t think crime is the real answer as there are many places to live in Chicago not even counting the suburbs where your risks of being a victim of crime is incredibly low.
https://www.timeout.com/chicago/thin...g-near-chicago

There is actually plenty to do within a short drive of Chicago, or even in the suburbs. It's certainly not bereft of hiking opportunities. Lots to do in WI, as well...as many Chicagoans have discovered. I kind of love the lakefront trail....beautiful views of the city and Lake Michigan. Views that are hard to beat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2023, 06:48 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,157 posts, read 7,980,515 times
Reputation: 10123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bicala View Post
https://www.timeout.com/chicago/thin...g-near-chicago

There is actually plenty to do within a short drive of Chicago, or even in the suburbs. It's certainly not bereft of hiking opportunities. Lots to do in WI, as well...as many Chicagoans have discovered. I kind of love the lakefront trail....beautiful views of the city and Lake Michigan. Views that are hard to beat.
Well... relative to the other five alpha cities, NYC LA Boston SF and LA ... then the other Beta+ cities like Seattle, DC, Philadelphia and Miami (i think?) ..Chicago by far has the least for natural environment. Its not devoid of hiking, but, relative to its peers. Its lower.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2023, 07:00 PM
 
Location: Florida
2,332 posts, read 2,276,900 times
Reputation: 3592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
So you actually believe Atlanta is less relevant today than it was when you were a kid?
Atlanta has faded to some degree.

Atlanta is obviously growing and obviously important. But when I was a kid, the Braves won the World Series and Atlanta hosted the Olympics. I remember the Olympic torch passing through my town on its way to the games… So, while it has grown since the 1990s it’s not hard to see how it’s less important on a relative basis. Also, it’s less dominant than it used to be regionally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top