Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-23-2024, 03:45 PM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,560,868 times
Reputation: 5785

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
True, it's all worthless without comparing boundaries.

The radius thing is also hard to use without details. What if 40% of the radius area is water? What if the chosen centerpoints aren't really parallel?
Houston was not impacted by water in any way for those radius populations. For those that were most impacted I moved the radius point as fairly as possible to keep the downtown core centered while still moving away from the water and searching for as much populated land as possible. Unfortunately for some cities affected by water they do lag behind a bit until the radius gets to a certain size.

Last edited by the resident09; 01-23-2024 at 04:28 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-23-2024, 04:04 PM
 
8,859 posts, read 6,859,567 times
Reputation: 8666
Some, like NYC, Seattle, and SF, will have large amounts of water regardless.

I don't know if the radius tools have this yet, but identifying land vs. water area would be a big improvement.

That said, I appreciate the numbers and the effort.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2024, 04:28 PM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,560,868 times
Reputation: 5785
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
Some, like NYC, Seattle, and SF, will have large amounts of water regardless.

I don't know if the radius tools have this yet, but identifying land vs. water area would be a big improvement.

That said, I appreciate the numbers and the effort.
Understood, and what I find best about the tool is that you can simply tap around it and move the center point at any area on the map. So quite honestly you get a good sense of the overall population of a place just playing with the tool because you can see where a place maxes out at. Every radius population I posted for each city was the highest population I could find at the fairest point possible to every city's downtown central point, whether it being hampered by water or not. But obviously the shapes of development patterns and physical geography of individual cities plays a role here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top