Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What is the next "big" city?
Omaha 25 6.78%
Jacksonville 23 6.23%
Charlotte 163 44.17%
Albuquerque 35 9.49%
Riverside 10 2.71%
Oklahoma City 37 10.03%
other, be specific 76 20.60%
Voters: 369. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-02-2009, 11:33 AM
 
Location: New Mexico to Texas
4,552 posts, read 15,027,788 times
Reputation: 2171

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by adavi215 View Post
I think it could be. I think ABQ would have to do something to attract these people. I haven't been there in over 10 years, but Sante Fe appeared to be more artistic. But if this happend, people discovering ABQ as a good alternate to Vegas and Phoenix, it could experience some of the same problems. I think ABQ, however, is a great city. I miss it.

Albuquerque has been attracting people for some time now, mostly from the East Coast and Northwest, just not on the level of Vegas and PHX. There have been more and more jobs created and most come for the culture,the mild 4 seasons type weather and outdoor activities and also its for those who dont want a big city.

I hope that ABQ never grows the way that Vegas or Phoenix did and if it ever does I will be moving.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-02-2009, 11:38 AM
 
1,247 posts, read 3,863,121 times
Reputation: 556
Quote:
Originally Posted by desert sun View Post
Since Nevada and Arizona have bad economies and are over crowded I wonder if more and more people will discover Albuquerque as a new Southwest location. It could be the answer to those who dont want the intense heat and traffic of Phoenix and Vegas. What do yall think?
Well, gee, if they wanted that they could just MOVE NORTH!!!!

Seriously, from what I've heard, ABQ is way better than Phoenix or Las Vegas could ever dream of being. So, hopefully all goes well. Now if we could just convince those stubborn southwesterners....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2009, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Western Hoosierland
17,998 posts, read 9,062,199 times
Reputation: 5943
Indianapolis,Indiana 802,000 people
Metropolitan area 2,040,000 people
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2009, 05:43 AM
 
Location: Cincinnati(Silverton)
1,606 posts, read 2,838,629 times
Reputation: 688
^For some reason Indy don't feel like it has over 2 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2009, 08:01 AM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,180 posts, read 14,869,796 times
Reputation: 2698
Quote:
Originally Posted by adavi215 View Post
^Good job on the stats. I am surprised to see Riverside with so high of a gdp. I have never really heard of this city, aside from Rick Warren, until this year. I always thought of it as a small town in Cali. But it seems to be a pretty well populated city. I am also equally surprised to see that out of the cities mentioned it has the lowest per capita. That makes me wonder what is the average hourly wage for an employee there and I also wonder about the unemployment. It is also the fastest growing area out of the cities mentioned so it doesn't look like it is going to get any better. However, I don't live there so the actual scene could be different.
Given its size, that doesn't seem to be a high GDP for Riverside. Its metro is over twice as large as Charlotte's, yet Charlotte has a higher GDP. Phoenix and Seattle have similar MSA populations and their GDPs are $179.5 million and $197.7 million, respectively. I'm thinking it must be a large low-paying service sector driving the economy in the Inland Empire, but I'm not sure. One thing is for sure: if homebuilding was a primary industry there, don't look for much GDP growth in the near future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2009, 02:55 PM
 
4,692 posts, read 9,306,402 times
Reputation: 1330
^Interesting. I always figured that it would be a good alternative to LA, which I'm sure could be a reason why it has a high population, perhaps sprawl from LA. At anyway, I always figured NoCal to be more progressive than SoCal, not to say SoCal sucks, but I think LA is heavily dependent on the entertainment industry. Nevertheless, that is not the topic of this thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2009, 02:56 PM
 
4,692 posts, read 9,306,402 times
Reputation: 1330
I am actually quite surprised to see that OKC, Omaha, and ABQ seem to be getting more votes than JAX. I wonder why that is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2009, 03:05 PM
 
Location: Western Hoosierland
17,998 posts, read 9,062,199 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
Originally Posted by unusualfire View Post
^For some reason Indy don't feel like it has over 2 million.

I know I live in the Indy area and it doesnt feel that way.Maybe because it is so spread out. Indianapolis is 379 sq. miles which is more than twice the size of Los Angeles! As of December 18th, 2008 the Indianapolis Metropolitan area has a population of 2,014,267.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2009, 03:18 PM
 
Location: LaSalle Park / St. Louis
572 posts, read 1,995,718 times
Reputation: 268
The city of Los Angeles is 470 sq. miles with approx. 3.8 million people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2009, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Western Hoosierland
17,998 posts, read 9,062,199 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
Originally Posted by st. louie louie View Post
The city of Los Angeles is 470 sq. miles with approx. 3.8 million people.

oops. For some reason I thought it was 179 sq. miles I also got Indianapolis wrong it is 419 sq. miles.

City of Indianapolis has a population of 805,500
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top