Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: LA vs Toronto
Los Angeles 277 56.30%
Toronto 215 43.70%
Voters: 492. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-26-2011, 03:06 PM
 
12 posts, read 27,327 times
Reputation: 13

Advertisements

Debit or credit or cash only. I paid with cash. I've only been there once but it was a very recent trip.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-26-2011, 03:15 PM
 
Location: Toronto
1,654 posts, read 5,855,640 times
Reputation: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by dweebo2220 View Post
LA did demolish a lot more of it's 19th century buildings though, so its easy to think that the city didn't exist until 1900...
So did Toronto... here's a couple examples:

Pre WWII:


Post:


Sad... isn't it?

All the lucky cities that managed to escape most of these downtown massacres are the ones out there that essentially died post WWII like Detroit, Cinci, Cleveland, Pitt, Buffalo, etc...

I'm not saying they didn't lose much of their history for the sake of parking lots too, it just wasn't on such a mass scale as Toronto and LA as they boomed like bats out of hell from the 50's - 80's.

Last edited by ThroatGuzzler; 05-26-2011 at 03:23 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 04:40 PM
 
940 posts, read 2,027,634 times
Reputation: 742
yeah.. redevelopment is a tough one.

LA is kinda cool because they moved the financial district to a cleared residential neighborhood (Bunker Hill) in the 60s. That means most of the old 10s/20s/30s downtown core is still there.

The big loss was the victorian and mid 1800s core, which was demolished during the 20s and 30s to make way for Union Station and City Hall, and then later cleared further for the civic center and the 101 freeway.

There's a very tiny bit of this early core still left around little tokyo, main street, and olvera street/chinatown:





and that's pretty much it...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 06:02 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
611 posts, read 1,601,004 times
Reputation: 669
Quote:
Originally Posted by dweebo2220 View Post
yeah.. redevelopment is a tough one.

LA is kinda cool because they moved the financial district to a cleared residential neighborhood (Bunker Hill) in the 60s. That means most of the old 10s/20s/30s downtown core is still there.

The big loss was the victorian and mid 1800s core, which was demolished during the 20s and 30s to make way for Union Station and City Hall, and then later cleared further for the civic center and the 101 freeway.

There's a very tiny bit of this early core still left around little tokyo, main street, and olvera street/chinatown:





and that's pretty much it...
How sad is that.....sigh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2011, 02:17 AM
 
1,092 posts, read 2,173,069 times
Reputation: 279
Toronto was 595,000 in 1997 and had 2,400,000 by the first of the year 1998 as the mayor back then wanted to mega merge with the nearby suburban cities and township and successfully did so to be this big city. What a sham! The real population now is actually 694,000 if stuck with original boundary. The city cheated, so keep this in mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2011, 09:54 PM
 
Location: ATL via ROC
1,214 posts, read 2,325,238 times
Reputation: 2578
Quote:
Originally Posted by durf View Post
Toronto was 595,000 in 1997 and had 2,400,000 by the first of the year 1998 as the mayor back then wanted to mega merge with the nearby suburban cities and township and successfully did so to be this big city. What a sham! The real population now is actually 694,000 if stuck with original boundary. The city cheated, so keep this in mind.
That's ridiculous. Los Angeles has an area of 502.693 square miles today, while Toronto is still less than half of that with only 243.2 square miles to call it's own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2011, 11:23 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
5,864 posts, read 15,244,428 times
Reputation: 6767
Quote:
Originally Posted by durf View Post
Toronto was 595,000 in 1997 and had 2,400,000 by the first of the year 1998 as the mayor back then wanted to mega merge with the nearby suburban cities and township and successfully did so to be this big city. What a sham! The real population now is actually 694,000 if stuck with original boundary. The city cheated, so keep this in mind.
I always wondered what was the reason this was done. I remember Montreal was always the largest city, or did they do the same thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 06:25 AM
 
Location: Gatineau, Québec
26,882 posts, read 38,032,223 times
Reputation: 11650
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwright1 View Post
I always wondered what was the reason this was done. I remember Montreal was always the largest city, or did they do the same thing.
Montreal was the largest "city proper" in Canada until the Toronto merger in the early 21st century. Toronto was actually only the third-largest '"city proper" in Canada before its merger. Calgary "city proper", which includes virtually all of its metro, was even bigger than Toronto.

But Toronto's metro was still by far the biggest in Canada, and has been since around 1980. Toronto's metro was (pre-merger) and is (today) one and a half times the the size of Montreal's and four to five times the size of Calgary's.

So Toronto has been considered Canada's largest city since 1980. Before then it was Montreal as you said.

For the record, Montreal also merged with some close-in suburbs in the early 2000s, pushing the city-proper's population from around 1 million to around 1.8 million. But it is still less than Toronto's merged city proper.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 05:16 PM
 
1,669 posts, read 4,241,768 times
Reputation: 978
Toronto and its former inner suburbs joined together to form a two tiered municipality in the 1950s called the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, or "Metro". They shared, police, transit and many other services and in many ways acted together as a single city made up of the old city and five boroughs. All that happened in 1998 was the second tier of government was eliminated and the municipality changed from being "Metropolitan Toronto" to the present City of Toronto.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 07:04 PM
 
199 posts, read 355,447 times
Reputation: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by durf View Post
Toronto was 595,000 in 1997 and had 2,400,000 by the first of the year 1998 as the mayor back then wanted to mega merge with the nearby suburban cities and township and successfully did so to be this big city. What a sham! The real population now is actually 694,000 if stuck with original boundary. The city cheated, so keep this in mind.
As usual durf, you're lying. The mayor was AGAINST the merger. As for your "cheating" comment, every city in the world has grown in size over time. Hell, Brooklyn was once a seperate city from New York, so according to you it "cheated" too. So you've lied twice in one post:

a. you lied when you said the mayor wanted to merge with nearby suburban cities and "townships" (what "townships"?)

b. you lied when you said they city "cheated", because all cities grow in size over time.

Oh, I just caught a third lie. The population was well over 600,000 in 1997, not 595,000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top