Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-03-2009, 01:44 PM
 
Location: los angeles
5,032 posts, read 12,611,786 times
Reputation: 1508

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago60614 View Post
New York, almost any city in Europe or Asia. Lots of areas of Boston, Chicago, Philly, etc. San Fran is certainly dense though. It helps that it's such a small area. If you take only 49 of the 237 square miles of Chicago along the north side of the city you're going to have density around 25,000 per square mile.

Manhattan is half the size of Chicago and much denser than NYC as a whole. It's amazing though how many people Asian cities and cram into a square mile.


New York:



Tokyo:



Chicago residential (kcgridlock)



Other Chicago stuff I had from flickr:




Chicago60614 Loved the sunset shot over Chicago!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-03-2009, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Crown Town
2,742 posts, read 6,752,731 times
Reputation: 1680
I love that satellite photo and how you can also see the density of the East Bay across the bridge. One of my favorite views is the one below, of the Oakland skyline with "The City" in the background....

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/k...on/BayArea.jpg

Last edited by JMT; 10-17-2013 at 07:14 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 04:02 PM
 
105 posts, read 373,819 times
Reputation: 63
That is a great shot. Whered you find it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carolina Blue View Post
I love that satellite photo and how you can also see the density of the East Bay across the bridge. One of my favorite views is the one below, of the Oakland skyline with "The City" in the background....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 04:12 PM
 
Location: Cardboard box
1,909 posts, read 3,784,084 times
Reputation: 1344
Density=SF's last ditch effort when they try to convince you they are in the big leagues. Okay it's dense, but its small, has a low population, the weather is not great for being a coastal city, and it's expensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 04:18 PM
 
105 posts, read 373,819 times
Reputation: 63
Actually, the contiguous urban Bay Area is comparable to Chicagoland in terms of population (7.5 million vs 9 million). Oakland, Berkeley, Daly City etc are urban and basically connect right to SF.

If political boundaries were drawn differently SF could easily have a population of 2 million and still be quite dense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LakeShoreSoxGo View Post
Density=SF's last ditch effort when they try to convince you they are in the big leagues. Okay it's dense, but its small, has a low population, the weather is not great for being a coastal city, and it's expensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 04:18 PM
 
Location: Marshall-Shadeland, Pittsburgh, PA
32,620 posts, read 77,624,272 times
Reputation: 19102
Quote:
Originally Posted by KerrTown View Post
I couldn't do that in the Tri-State NYC area.
It's now the Quad-State NYC area. Thank you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 04:25 PM
 
Location: Cardboard box
1,909 posts, read 3,784,084 times
Reputation: 1344
Quote:
Originally Posted by johntremaine View Post
Actually, the contiguous urban Bay Area is comparable to Chicagoland in terms of population (7.5 million vs 9 million). Oakland, Berkeley, Daly City etc are urban and basically connect right to SF.

If political boundaries were drawn differently SF could easily have a population of 2 million and still be quite dense.

Oakland isn't dense at all. Save the tiny downtown and Lake Merrit area. Berkley isn't really dense either. Tons of old single story homes. Don't get me wrong, it's still relatively (for california) urban. If you expanded Sf's boundries it would actually be less dense. I'd suggest doing some research.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 04:39 PM
 
55 posts, read 210,767 times
Reputation: 48
He didnt say it would be more dense. I agree that you could easily combine SF, Oakland, Berkeley, and Daly City and it would still be a dense city. Oakland, Berkeley, and DC remind me of some of the less dense areas of Chicago (but not the least dense industrial areas in the south)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LakeShoreSoxGo View Post
Oakland isn't dense at all. Save the tiny downtown and Lake Merrit area. Berkley isn't really dense either. Tons of old single story homes. Don't get me wrong, it's still relatively (for california) urban. If you expanded Sf's boundries it would actually be less dense. I'd suggest doing some research.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 04:43 PM
 
55 posts, read 210,767 times
Reputation: 48
Here are some numbers:

Daly City: 13,703 people per sq. mile

Berkeley density: 9823 people per sq mile

Oakland density: 7126 people per sq mile

Not to mention, SF's density (and these other cities) has increased greatly since the 2000 census.



Quote:
Originally Posted by LakeShoreSoxGo View Post
Oakland isn't dense at all. Save the tiny downtown and Lake Merrit area. Berkley isn't really dense either. Tons of old single story homes. Don't get me wrong, it's still relatively (for california) urban. If you expanded Sf's boundries it would actually be less dense. I'd suggest doing some research.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 04:44 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
389 posts, read 1,095,941 times
Reputation: 282
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScranBarre View Post
It's now the Quad-State NYC area. Thank you.
Boo!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top