Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seattle wins. If downtown Minneapolis and downtown St. Paul were clustered together, it would be comparable to Seattle. Minneapolis alone has too few buildings.
Honestly, I prefer the architecture of many of the individual high rises in Minneapolis over ones in Seattle. However, as a whole, Seattle's larger and cohesive high-rises paired with the Space Needle make for a striking skyline, and Mt. Rainer just makes it all look so much better. I'll have to go with Seattle.
Seattle. Like I said before, Minneapolis' skyline is very ugly to me because of the lack of "filler" buildings. Every major scraper tries to look "unique". The architects have no sense of surroundings and fitting in when designing the buildings there.
Seattle. Like I said before, Minneapolis' skyline is very ugly to me because of the lack of "filler" buildings. Every major scraper tries to look "unique". The architects have no sense of surroundings and fitting in when designing the buildings there.
I'm sure Cesar Pelli, Pei Cobb Freed & Partners, Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Ellerbe Becket, etc... didn't have any sense of surroundings.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seattle
