Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Pittsburgh has my vote. The shape of it's downtown positioned snugly between the two rivers is brilliant. And all those bridges give a great balance that is pleasing to the eye. The way the foothills rise around the town is lovely too. Pittsburgh always had a fascinating skyline to me. Nothing quite like it in the US in my book besides New York.
I think I like Minneapolis's more especially if you include St. Paul.
Minneapolis is ok... too many buildings from one era though (post modern) for my tastes. It just can't compete with the building style and diversity/texture of Pittsburgh. Not to mention more iconic buildings, and its perfect setting at the rivers intersection among the many hills/bridges. Its really not even close if you ask me.
Pittsburgh has better density OUTSIDE the skyline than Minneapolis. Skyline wise Minneapolis is as dense as it can be. I don't see Pittsburgh beat that.
Pittsburgh CBD is .66 sq. miles
Minneapolis CBD is .72 sq. miles
Normally I'd pick Pittsburgh over a lot of places but I think Mpls has an unparralelled balance to it's skyline. It's much more solid and rounded out. Having your top 3 all within a few feet of each other makes for a nice dramatic stepdown affect once the other buildings start trailing off from there.
I like both but Mpls edges out Pitt for me.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.