Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which is more urban?
Boston 72 63.72%
DC 41 36.28%
Voters: 113. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-20-2011, 07:53 AM
 
1,223 posts, read 2,268,400 times
Reputation: 780

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Personally while I feel DC is definately urban, it does not feel as urban as Boston in the city. Also adding Cambridge (a more urban extension than any in DC) it also feels like a larger city/urban footprint. street by street there will be differences but in the core Boston looks and feels more urban and is developed with a higher compression. DC to me only feels less urban in the core/city than NYC, Boston, Chicago, Philly, SF and maybe LA (also the core of Baltimore in some ways does and in some ways doesnt) So to me there is really only a handful of cities that feel moreso. To me DC feels more urban than Miami regardless of population density.
Boston feels more clautrophobic for sure, but DC has larger sidewalks which make it feel like more people are around (during busy times of day). Also, Boston has water everywhere, and though hopping off the T makes it feel connected, Cambridge is truly separated. Boston area seems to have a continuous urbanity that slowly fades when you drive down most streets. DC is spottier for sure, but doesn't completely break (IMO). If you include water crossings, then again Boston is again dense then slowly fading and DC is spottier and vast (I'm thinking of Rt. 1 to Alexandria).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-20-2011, 07:58 AM
 
Location: Washington, DC area
11,108 posts, read 23,911,879 times
Reputation: 6438
Boston by quite a bit, although parts of DC give Boston some good competition.

Both are very urban cities though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 08:04 AM
 
5,347 posts, read 10,168,327 times
Reputation: 2446
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmac9wr View Post
Even though I'd say Back Bay is more urban, I think they're pretty close. I think Georgetown is a fantastic neighborhood...though I agree there are a lot of chains. There are a boatload of chains throughout DC actually. Not to say they aren't in Boston too, but there appeared to be an overwhelming amount of national chains there.
What chains? Apple store, Banana Republic, Coach, Northface, etc.. They are in every city. You make it sound like a Home Depot or a Walmart are in Georgetown. BTW: Georgetown has a lot of authentic restaurants, boutiques, clothing stores and such. The small slew of chain stores i mentioned are not overwhelming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 08:05 AM
 
Location: Washington, DC area
11,108 posts, read 23,911,879 times
Reputation: 6438
Here are some pics of Boston neighborhoods (backbay, north end, beacon hill etc). Sorry, no pics of DC, they won't let me fly over it for some reason

















Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 08:08 AM
 
1,223 posts, read 2,268,400 times
Reputation: 780
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcmo View Post
Here are some pics of Boston neighborhoods (backbay, north end, beacon hill etc). Sorry, no pics of DC, they won't let me fly over it for some reason
Nice pics. The irony of it is that it's uniformity makes it look more urban. Is that back bay with the red brick houses
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 08:13 AM
 
1,223 posts, read 2,268,400 times
Reputation: 780
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC's Finest View Post
What chains? Apple store, Banana Republic, Coach, Northface, etc.. They are in every city. You make it sound like a Home Depot or a Walmart are in Georgetown. BTW: Georgetown has a lot of authentic restaurants, boutiques, clothing stores and such. The small slew of chain stores i mentioned are not overwhelming.
True, but there is also a Johnny Rockets, H&M, ALDO, Five Guys (they blew up now), some chain ice cream too. There are some Georgetown specialties though, like Georgetown cupcakes, Mate, and the burger place with angel wings on the front. I am actually going to Georgetown today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 08:15 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,119 posts, read 34,767,213 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmac9wr View Post
Even though I'd say Back Bay is more urban, I think they're pretty close. I think Georgetown is a fantastic neighborhood...though I agree there are a lot of chains. There are a boatload of chains throughout DC actually. Not to say they aren't in Boston too, but there appeared to be an overwhelming amount of national chains there.
I don't think it's really close at all. First, Back Bay is way more built up than Georgetown. Georgetown is sort of a quaint shopping district full of small two-story rowhomes. While M Street and the Waterfront can get quite busy on weekends, I think it pales in comparison to Back Bay which is in closer proximity to other attractions such as the Common and the Theater District.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deeman804 View Post
Boston feels more clautrophobic for sure, but DC has larger sidewalks which make it feel like more people are around (during busy times of day). Also, Boston has water everywhere, and though hopping off the T makes it feel connected, Cambridge is truly separated. Boston area seems to have a continuous urbanity that slowly fades when you drive down most streets. DC is spottier for sure, but doesn't completely break (IMO). If you include water crossings, then again Boston is again dense then slowly fading and DC is spottier and vast (I'm thinking of Rt. 1 to Alexandria).
I understand what you're saying. DC is far spottier, especially headed down Route 1 past Potomac Yards. Though I'm not sure if the urbanity is any more vast in DC. I think it depends on where you're coming from. If you were heading straight from downtown Bethesda through DC to get to Old Town, then yes, it would seem more vast. But if you were heading from Downtown DC to Suitland, you would see a very rapid breakdown in the development, and eventually end up in a very wooded area before you even crossed the District line into Maryland.

You also have to keep in mind that a trip from Bethesda to Old Town is going to seem way more taxing than a trip from Charlestown to Southie because there's no highway that cuts straight through Northwest DC. Boston, on the other hand, has I-93. Imagine how much more of Boston you would see on the way from South Boston to East Boston if you had to take surface streets the entire route.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 08:19 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,119 posts, read 34,767,213 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcmo View Post
Here are some pics of Boston neighborhoods (backbay, north end, beacon hill etc). Sorry, no pics of DC, they won't let me fly over it for some reason
Great pictures. You simply won't find that type of density here in DC.

Another thing that has to be considered is the structural density of outlying residential areas such as Mattapan vis-a-vis areas in DC such as Congress Heights. There's quite a difference between Blue Hill Avenue and MLK/South Capitol Street.

Last edited by BajanYankee; 10-20-2011 at 08:27 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 08:26 AM
 
5,347 posts, read 10,168,327 times
Reputation: 2446
hUH?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2011, 08:42 AM
 
1,223 posts, read 2,268,400 times
Reputation: 780
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
Great pictures. You simply won't find that type of density here in DC.

Another thing that has to be considered is the structural density of outlying residential areas such as Mattapan vis-a-vis areas in DC such as Congress Heights. There's quite a difference between Blue Hill Avenue and MLK/South Capitol Street.
First off, I am not a Boston expert and I want to throw that out there but I actually went to Mattapan. Alexandria, Silver Spring, Ballston etc. they have a similar distance from downtown DC but is built completely differently. Mattapan was more residential-ly to me.

As a sidenote, for it to have such a bad rap, it looked no scarier than Georgia Ave. I think the type of people that live there compared to most of the city plays a part in how they view it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top