Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-21-2011, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Washington, DC NoVA
1,103 posts, read 2,261,202 times
Reputation: 777

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAMEN VII View Post
my point is D.C actually IS a small city when compared to chicago..
no sh#*. that's not the point and it has no effect on a murder rate being higher or lower than if the city is smaller. do you understand the concept of murder rates? do you even know what per capita means?

Quote:
so comparing the two in terms of crime rates is pointless..500 murders during the 90's for chicago would've been considered a GOOD thing..same for nyc and L.A..
of course it would have. chicago was what about 4 times the population of dc? do the math. dc had half the murders chicago had with 1/4 the population. it's simple math and if you can't grasp this then you really have no credibility to argue this. and chicago today has less murders than dc had and it's still considered dangerous. so a city that's like 4 times bigger than dc in city limits has less murders than dc had and is still considered dangerous. that speaks volumes of how violent dc actually was in the 90s.

Quote:
and as for that "bad side/good side of the city" talk you're doing, the same could be said for east saint louis..every city has a bad side/good side..
i'm pretty sure east st louis has no good neighborhoods. if it does have this "good part," it is tiny enough to be moot anyway. it's similar to compton and camden. it's too small to have "sides." it pretty much is a "side."

Last edited by CelticGermanicPride; 02-21-2011 at 06:39 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-21-2011, 09:17 PM
 
170 posts, read 391,460 times
Reputation: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by CelticGermanicPride View Post
no sh#*. that's not the point and it has no effect on a murder rate being higher or lower than if the city is smaller. do you understand the concept of murder rates? do you even know what per capita means?
i know exactly what it means..and depending on how small or big the city is..it actually DOES have an effect on the murder rate..i can't believe you don't understand that


Quote:
of course it would have. chicago was what about 4 times the population of dc? do the math. dc had half the murders chicago had with 1/4 the population. it's simple math and if you can't grasp this then you really have no credibility to argue this. and chicago today has less murders than dc had and it's still considered dangerous. so a city that's like 4 times bigger than dc in city limits has less murders than dc had and is still considered dangerous. that speaks volumes of how violent dc actually was in the 90s.
see, thats why you can't compare the two..chicago is a highly segregated city, and have always had heavily populated neighborhoods where there wasn't much (if any) crime..so that would automatically bring a certain balance to the city..but does that mean chicago is not as violent as d.c? no, it just means we have more areas in the city where crime is not an issue..but the areas that are bad, are really bad..

and yes chicago is still considered dangerous today because nationwide, the murder rates are a lot lower then in the 90's...the years d.c was at its worst was also at the time when the rest of countries major cities was too, so d.c didn't stand out..


Quote:
i'm pretty sure east st louis has no good neighborhoods. if it does have this "good part," it is tiny enough to be moot anyway. it's similar to compton and camden. it's too small to have "sides." it pretty much is a "side."
every city has good parts, and just like you may consider east saint louis as "tiny", we also look at d.c in general as "tiny" too..see how that works?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2011, 10:51 PM
 
Location: the future
2,593 posts, read 4,655,643 times
Reputation: 1583
Default boredatwork

Chicago(3.8mil) is 6.3 X bigger than DC(600k) and DC had almost half its murders in the 90's...so if Chicago had 970 murders as its peak...at the size of DC it would have 970/6.3=153 homicides..If DC were the size of Chicago it would've had 482x6.3+=3036 homicides..Ppl say DC isnt as big but its just not DC its also PG County...NE,SE DC has about 70% of DC murders and inside the beltway of PG would guess around 80-90%..so that area of 500k+ ppl would compare to any major area in any major city..even NY
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2011, 11:20 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,751,203 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by boreatwork View Post
Chicago(3.8mil) is 6.3 X bigger than DC(600k) and DC had almost half its murders in the 90's...so if Chicago had 970 murders as its peak...at the size of DC it would have 970/6.3=153 homicides..If DC were the size of Chicago it would've had 482x6.3+=3036 homicides..Ppl say DC isnt as big but its just not DC its also PG County...NE,SE DC has about 70% of DC murders and inside the beltway of PG would guess around 80-90%..so that area of 500k+ ppl would compare to any major area in any major city..even NY
Thank goodness the D.C. border PG county neighborhoods couldn't be counted in D.C.'s total in the 90's. D.C. would have had 600-700 murders. D.C. just had a different mentality back then. I don't think there has ever been a city as bad as D.C. was at the time. Well, at least that is what the FBI says.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2011, 11:28 PM
 
11 posts, read 25,220 times
Reputation: 15
Pretty much everywhere was bad in the 90's. Or so it seemed.......

New Orleans, Saint Louis, Baltimore, Chicago, and DC come to mind though if I remember correctly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2011, 11:32 PM
 
11 posts, read 25,220 times
Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post

West Virginia

Crips, Simon City Royals
Oh yeah West by God keepin it gangsta just the way I like it. I'm actually glad to not see Virginia mixed into the list. Thanks for skipping us!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2011, 11:50 PM
 
Location: Metro Phoenix
11,039 posts, read 16,858,983 times
Reputation: 12950
I think most cities were way more dangerous in the 90's (especially the early 90's) than now.

In the 90's in LA, the way you showed you were a big dog/ice cold killa was by shooting up people who had nothing to do with you, your gang, any other gang... who just happened to be there, to be shot.

This sort of behaviour is the sort of behaviour that gets the cops to do just the same to gang members, and gangs typcially are more than happy to silence anyone who's sending them all up the creek.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 10:07 AM
 
90 posts, read 246,683 times
Reputation: 45
The worst parts of Chicago were way worse then the worst parts of dc back then, and right now the ghettos in chicago alone are near the entire size of all of dc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 10:42 AM
 
Location: Chicago
3,569 posts, read 7,197,612 times
Reputation: 2637
Exactly.
Chicagos southside is bigger then a lot of smaller cities with high crime.

Chicagos bad sides are diluted by the not so bad parts and everyone thinks its all gravy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 11:25 AM
 
90 posts, read 246,683 times
Reputation: 45
Who ever said dc was more dangerous and had worse housing projects then Chicago in the 90's has no idea what he's talking about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top