Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The U.S. Census does not consider Latino to be a race.
Latinos are considered to be an ethnicity.
The problem is that Latinos can be basically anything, so it's hard to classify.
I know the Latino stereotype in the U.S. is only of Indio-looking Mexicans, but Latinos (and even Mexicans) come in all shapes, sizes and colors.
I know tall, blond Mexicans, Chinese Peruvians and many others. The issue is that many of the immigrants to the U.S. are Indio-looking Mexicans, so that is the stereotype.
Not to throw insults around, because you and I usually agree with one another...but your brother sounds like an idiot. Not only are people in major cities like NYC and Boston more fit than their Southern counterparts (on average), but there's many more up here than there are down there. As I mentioned before, when I'm walking around the city there's a ridiculous amount of hot girls walking around.
What makes the woman in the south more attractive is their personalities, style, ad elegance. Tans are also a plus; the women up north are too pale.
Wow so you are saying that Women up north are not elegant okay... Women in the South may be tanned but guess who are better looking in the long run? The Northern women because remember if a person is exposed to the sun everyday their skin will get damaged. So this is why I say Northern women are better looking
It has to be LA, NYC and MIA they got models for days. But i voted for NYC.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.