Quote:
Originally Posted by pgm123
A "W"?
But your big problem is that you seem to be treating something quite subjective as if it's objective.
|
That's true, to a certain extent I guess....
But the thing is, I've been explaining my personal subjective reasons as to why I think Boston's skyline looks better, if that makes sense.
And I still haven't heard anyone give me a good reason as to why they think Philly's is better.
All I seen is this....
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrjun18
Boston is a great city, but if there is one thing I dont like about it, its def the skyline.
Philly easily takes this.
|
and this
Quote:
Originally Posted by tawfiqmp
Philadelphia. No doubt.
|
and this
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toure
Because it has a better skyline....
|
No explanaition whatsoever.
Philly's skyline is better....just because....it is.......
and this
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summersm343
Boston has better architecture?! Since when? Haha.
|
Which was better, but still not backed up very well. The argument still had an air of "Philly's better and that's just the way it is"...
.........
There have been some half decent pro-Boston responses though
like this
Quote:
Originally Posted by tocoto
Most (Not all) tall buildings are office buildings. Boston and Cambridge have over 80M sq ft of office wile Philly has ~43M. Boston has a much larger skyline in terms of volume and between the JHT, custom house ad others plenty of iconic buildings. Philly has taller buildings but fewer 500 footers. Boston also has lovely ocean and river backdrops. Juding skylines from photos is not very easy. IMO, in person Boston is more encompassing and impressive.
|
and this
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrantiX
Boston.
Cant beat the ocean view
|
which offer at least some explanation
.........
I'm okay with people honestly thinking that Philly's skyline is superior.
As you said, its entirely subjective.
I just want to hear some quality reasoning!