Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: The best of the West?
Vancouver BC - Seattle - Portland 30 57.69%
Los Angeles - San Diego- Tijuana 22 42.31%
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-23-2009, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Seattle
571 posts, read 1,174,400 times
Reputation: 834

Advertisements

Which of these two regions of the west do you think is better? The LA-SD-TJ corridor, or the Van-Sea-Por corridor? The bay area is out of this discussion as it is somewhere in the middle, but we are going international including cities from Canada and Mexico that are very linked to US cities.

For me, I'd much rather live in Cascadia, but love visiting the SW for a break during the winter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-23-2009, 07:19 PM
 
Location: New York
11,326 posts, read 20,338,414 times
Reputation: 6231
The Southland for me, I like the idea of year round warm/mild weather and palm trees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2009, 07:22 PM
 
Location: Queens, NY
650 posts, read 1,328,194 times
Reputation: 396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infamous92 View Post
The Southland for me, I like the idea of year round warm/mild weather and palm trees.
My thoughts exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2009, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Seattle
571 posts, read 1,174,400 times
Reputation: 834
I'm not totally opposed to the South either....I love living in Seattle, but could easily see myself in LA too (albeit it would have to be certain parts of LA) so should be interesting to see how this plays out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2009, 08:06 PM
 
593 posts, read 1,762,769 times
Reputation: 314
The cities in Cascadia are more walkable and compact. Politically, it's also closer to where I'm at...so I would choose Cascadia. Although would enjoy visiting Soutland...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2009, 08:07 PM
 
593 posts, read 1,762,769 times
Reputation: 314
If the Bay Area were an option, by the way, I think it would win handily as it combines the best aspects of both areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2009, 09:22 PM
 
Location: yeah
5,717 posts, read 16,353,364 times
Reputation: 2975
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcroJimmy2 View Post
If the Bay Area were an option, by the way, I think it would win handily as it combines the best aspects of both areas.
No, it's far more like Southern California* than Cascadia.

*Southland refers to Los Angeles, Ventura, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties. San Diego and Tijuana are beyond that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2009, 09:43 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
293 posts, read 900,628 times
Reputation: 147
I voted for the Cascadia region. The cities here are just as a whole a lot better then the southern cities IMO. I love seeing stunning ice capped mountains from literally my back yard. I think the PNW has easily the most beautiful scenery in the entire US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2009, 11:50 PM
 
Location: Spain
1,854 posts, read 4,923,721 times
Reputation: 973
I grew up in the PNW and currently live in the Southland.

I think the PNW is much more beautiful - Portland, Seattle, and Vancouver are all more attractive than L.A. in my opinion. At the same time though, there's more to do in Southern California than just about anywhere else. I could live in both.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2009, 08:03 AM
 
Location: Orlando, FL
1,988 posts, read 7,151,270 times
Reputation: 656
I grew up in the Pac NW and nothing could get me to move back but I do recognize that there are many redeeming factors.

LA is one of my favorite cities, SF is one of the most beautiful and amenity packed cities in the world, and SD though overrated is a great great place to live as well. The weather totally tips the scales for me and I voted for the Southland. I don't know if it is fair that I used SF in my argument for the Southland though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top