Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-27-2010, 09:19 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,762,751 times
Reputation: 17399

Advertisements

NORTHEAST: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia.

SOUTH: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia.

MIDWEST: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.

SOUTHWEST: Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas.

ROCKY MOUNTAINS: Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming.

PACIFIC: Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington.

KEY: The fastest-growing economies are shaded in BLUE. The slowest-growing economies are shaded in RED.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-27-2010, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
571 posts, read 1,282,524 times
Reputation: 295
I agree with your list - looks good
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2010, 11:12 PM
 
Location: Jersey Boy living in Florida
3,717 posts, read 8,190,559 times
Reputation: 892
Ouch, well you didn't highlight Florida, New York, or New Jersey so thats not really good or bad lol, but you highlighted California as being the slowest for Pacific? Can I ask why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2010, 11:47 PM
 
1,250 posts, read 2,519,307 times
Reputation: 283
It looks similar to my guess. Though I would swap New Mexico with Arizona and Georgia with South Carolina. The first pair based on housing issues among other things and the latter due to growth starting to shift there combined with a smaller starting base. I also think swapping Mississippi with Louisiana due to natural and manmade disasters and their potential long-term effect.

Some of this also could have within a region other states not far from either end as well. Growth could be either absolute or per-capita basis since some states could have either population or per-capital growth faster. Also demographic trends will play into this depending on where people move to and the impending retirement of millions causing future issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2010, 11:53 PM
 
12,735 posts, read 21,792,548 times
Reputation: 3774
I think North Carolina should be blue instead of Georgia by a long shot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2010, 09:47 AM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,762,751 times
Reputation: 17399
Quote:
Originally Posted by clean_polo View Post
Ouch, well you didn't highlight Florida, New York, or New Jersey so thats not really good or bad lol, but you highlighted California as being the slowest for Pacific? Can I ask why?
Florida needs to diversify its economy and not be so reliant upon tourism and construction. New York and New Jersey are expensive, and Pennsylvania will benefit as a result. California's government is a mess, and that will likely stymie growth there for the foreseeable future. Washington seems the most stable of the Pacific states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2010, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,231,263 times
Reputation: 7428
I'd think NC would have the fastest growing economy in the south.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2010, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Jersey Boy living in Florida
3,717 posts, read 8,190,559 times
Reputation: 892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnutella View Post
Florida needs to diversify its economy and not be so reliant upon tourism and construction. New York and New Jersey are expensive, and Pennsylvania will benefit as a result. California's government is a mess, and that will likely stymie growth there for the foreseeable future. Washington seems the most stable of the Pacific states.
Oh ok, I see what you mean.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2010, 02:47 PM
 
2,106 posts, read 6,634,412 times
Reputation: 963
Are South Dakota, North Dakota, Nebraska, etc in the midwest?? I always had the impression they were western. When I think of Midwest, I think of Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, Wisconsin, Missouri, etc.. but I just moved to the midwest so I'm not sure.

But OP, what are you basing this off of? A recent article had Ohio in the top 3 for increase in jobs in 2010.. with 35,000 jobs added. So I'm going to have to disagree with your opinion. Heck, 28 fortune 500 companies would put it ahead of most of the Midwest states you have listed.


Oh and I believe it was Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York who are leading the nation in job increases, followed by Texas. Seems like the most populated states are continuing to be the leaders.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2010, 02:51 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,762,751 times
Reputation: 17399
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeSoHood View Post
Are South Dakota, North Dakota, Nebraska, etc in the midwest?? I always had the impression they were western. When I think of Midwest, I think of Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, Wisconsin, Missouri, etc.. but I just moved to the midwest so I'm not sure.

But OP, what are you basing this off of? A recent article had Ohio in the top 3 for increase in jobs in 2010.. with 35,000 jobs added. So I'm going to have to disagree with your opinion. Heck, 28 fortune 500 companies would put it ahead of most of the Midwest states you have listed.


Oh and I believe it was Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York who are leading the nation in job increases, followed by Texas. Seems like the most populated states are continuing to be the leaders.
I'm talking about the next 10 years overall. One month doesn't necessarily illustrate a pattern.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top