Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Most Walkable City?
New York City, NY 140 59.57%
Los Angeles, CA 7 2.98%
Chicago, IL 63 26.81%
Houston, TX 7 2.98%
Phoenix, AZ 2 0.85%
Philadelphia, PA 48 20.43%
San Antonio, TX 4 1.70%
Dallas, TX 5 2.13%
San Diego, CA 8 3.40%
San Jose, CA 4 1.70%
Detroit, MI 4 1.70%
San Francisco, CA 73 31.06%
Jacksonville, FL 1 0.43%
Indianapolis, IN 1 0.43%
Austin, TX 5 2.13%
Columbus, OH 3 1.28%
Fort Worth, TX 2 0.85%
Charlotte, NC 1 0.43%
Memphis, TN 1 0.43%
Baltimore, MD 19 8.09%
Boston, MA 66 28.09%
El Paso, TX 2 0.85%
Milwaukee, WI 15 6.38%
Denver, CO 9 3.83%
Seattle, WA 24 10.21%
Nashville, TN 1 0.43%
Washington D.C. 49 20.85%
Las Vegas, NV 2 0.85%
Portland, OR 24 10.21%
Louisville, KY 1 0.43%
Oklahoma City, OK 1 0.43%
Tucson, AZ 1 0.43%
Atlanta, GA 5 2.13%
Albuquerque, NM 2 0.85%
Kansas City, MO 2 0.85%
Anchorage, AK 4 1.70%
Sacramento, CA 4 1.70%
Long Beach, CA 5 2.13%
Boise, ID 2 0.85%
Omaha, NE 1 0.43%
Cleveland, OH 8 3.40%
Pittsburgh, PA 21 8.94%
Miami, FL 11 4.68%
Tampa, FL 1 0.43%
Reno, NV 1 0.43%
New Orleans, LA 16 6.81%
Minneapolis, MN 9 3.83%
Des Moines, IA 1 0.43%
Honolulu, HI 11 4.68%
Other 7 2.98%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 235. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-21-2024, 12:29 PM
 
Location: On the Great South Bay
9,169 posts, read 13,239,989 times
Reputation: 10141

Advertisements

Voted for 5 - NYC, Chicago, Philadelphia, Boston and Washington DC.

^ Los Angeles is there because I believe the OP started the list in population order. Otherwise, it is a confusing list. LA of course has some walkability, just not as much percentage wise as some of the others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-21-2024, 12:34 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
5,003 posts, read 5,975,356 times
Reputation: 4323
Quote:
Originally Posted by KinBueno View Post
A corner store isn't sexy for tourists, but if you are in a bind you can get milk, eggs, soda and snacks pretty much within a 15 minute walk.
That's a very low bar for walkability and many small towns in rural areas would do much better than this. To me amenities that should be available within a 15-minute walk would include: grocery store or multiple bodegas, drug stores, doctors, dentists, restaurants/dining, two or more transit stops, elementary school, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2024, 01:02 PM
 
Location: Northern California
4,601 posts, read 2,992,254 times
Reputation: 8349
San Francisco, where I live, surely belongs in the top few.
And remember that weather plays a role in walkability:
Who wants to walk anywhere if the temperature is in the teens
and there are patches of ice on the pavement?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2024, 01:37 PM
 
356 posts, read 129,636 times
Reputation: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Easy View Post
That's a very low bar for walkability and many small towns in rural areas would do much better than this. To me amenities that should be available within a 15-minute walk would include: grocery store or multiple bodegas, drug stores, doctors, dentists, restaurants/dining, two or more transit stops, elementary school, etc.
That was just one example.
None of the things you added are particularly sexy. They would just be more examples of what I'm talking about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2024, 01:53 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
5,003 posts, read 5,975,356 times
Reputation: 4323
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW4me View Post
San Francisco, where I live, surely belongs in the top few.
And remember that weather plays a role in walkability:
Who wants to walk anywhere if the temperature is in the teens
and there are patches of ice on the pavement?
Agreed but most wouldn't want to traverse large hills either. Aside from that and even accounting for that, SF is near the top.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2024, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
5,003 posts, read 5,975,356 times
Reputation: 4323
Quote:
Originally Posted by KinBueno View Post
That was just one example.
None of the things you added are particularly sexy. They would just be more examples of what I'm talking about.
Can you walk to all of those things and more in the areas that you were describing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2024, 03:29 PM
 
8,856 posts, read 6,851,017 times
Reputation: 8651
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Easy View Post
Agreed but most wouldn't want to traverse large hills either. Aside from that and even accounting for that, SF is near the top.
If you do it a lot, you'll be in better shape in no time.

That said, I take a bus or an occasional Uber if I'm visiting a friend at the top of a big hill (vs. showing up sweaty), then walk back.

As for the ability to buy milk, in a truly walkable area a store is a few blocks at most.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2024, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
5,003 posts, read 5,975,356 times
Reputation: 4323
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
If you do it a lot, you'll be in better shape in no time.

That said, I take a bus or an occasional Uber if I'm visiting a friend at the top of a big hill (vs. showing up sweaty), then walk back.

As for the ability to buy milk, in a truly walkable area a store is a few blocks at most.
Yeah and I'm sure that shoveling snow has exercise benefits as well. It's all personal preference to some extent but despite the health benefits most people prefer pleasant. It's not always snowy and icy in cold weather cities but the hills don't change in places that have them.

I agree about the milk/necessities. I'd expect them to be closer and more prevalent in general than dentists and movie theaters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2024, 11:36 PM
 
4,520 posts, read 5,093,240 times
Reputation: 4839
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Easy View Post
Number 20 is the bottom of a list of 20 but it's still very high overall when looking at all cities.

I agree that Charlotte is odd but LA is way more walkable than Cleveland imo.
We'll agree to strongly disagree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2024, 04:54 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
7,736 posts, read 5,511,932 times
Reputation: 5978
Quote:
Originally Posted by KinBueno View Post
The 20 most walkable cities in the US according to CNTraveler:


1. New York
2. Boston
3. Washington, D.C.
4. Seattle
5. Portland
6. San Francisco
7. Chicago
8. Los Angeles
9. Pittsburgh
10.Philadelphia
11.Minneapolis-St. Paul
12. Miami
13. Charlotte
14. Austin
15. Atlanta
16. Denver
17. Cleveland
18. Houston
19. Columbus
20. Baltimore

Some very questionable rankings in there, and the criteria is pretty vague, but these lists are usually click-bait anyway
Philadelphia that low in particular is pretty striking.

Link: https://www.cntraveler.com/story/mos...ties-in-the-us

I have seen this article shared a few times and just want to point out it's anti-intellectual nonsense. The "author" (click-bait producer) took the one graph in the attached report and repurposed it as a "10 most walkable cities" list.


The graph in question:






Now, let me ask you this: The CN Traveler article's subtitle is "lace up your sneakers for an adventure" which implies "fly to this city, and get ready to walk around!". Is that really what this chart is ranking? No. It's showing the RATIO of what % of a category is in a walkable environment. Philadelphia is multiple times bigger than Pittsburgh. It also has some of the world's highest business taxes. Does Pittsburgh become more "walkable" because 51% of area offices are downtown vs. 39% of Philadelphia? No, and frankly, it has nothing to do with actual "built walkable environments" which is what the term walkability actually means.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top