Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Coastal North Carolina
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-31-2016, 02:31 PM
 
398 posts, read 498,270 times
Reputation: 327

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LM117 View Post
According to the Minutes of the March 17, 2016 meeting, the Super 70 Corridor Commission is recommending that NCDOT apply to AASHTO and FHWA to designate the US-70 corridor from I-40 near Garner to Morehead City as I-50. NCDOT will likely go along with it. I'm not sure how to link PDF documents here, but the link to the PDF can be found on this page. Mystery solved!

Meetings / Meetings
Media reports say signs going up say "Future I-70".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-31-2016, 03:02 PM
 
1,291 posts, read 1,597,631 times
Reputation: 782
Media isn't usually right on details like this anymore, sadly.

I don't understand why I-50 if they want I-44 on what's currently 64... it's out of pattern (not the first time, though).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2016, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,821,351 times
Reputation: 4824
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarnetAndBlack View Post
Media isn't usually right on details like this anymore, sadly.
Exactly. Besides, there's already an I-70 that goes from I-695 in Baltimore to I-15 in Cove Fort, Utah. Even NCDOT isn't stupid enough to apply for "I-70". AASHTO and FHWA would reject it in a New York minute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2016, 05:15 PM
 
398 posts, read 498,270 times
Reputation: 327
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarnetAndBlack View Post
Media isn't usually right on details like this anymore, sadly.

I don't understand why I-50 if they want I-44 on what's currently 64... it's out of pattern (not the first time, though).
Well, I think even the media can read a 2 digit number...

"Today, it’s sprinkled with stoplights – slowing your drive to the beach. But some day soon it will be called U.S. Interstate 70. On Wednesday, Gov. Pat McCrory and other dignitaries unveiled a “future U.S. Interstate 70†sign on U.S. 70 in Goldsboro."

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...erstate-i.html

But if McCrory has proven anything, its that he's no genius.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2016, 05:33 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,821,351 times
Reputation: 4824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky Dawg View Post
Well, I think even the media can read a 2 digit number...

"Today, it’s sprinkled with stoplights – slowing your drive to the beach. But some day soon it will be called U.S. Interstate 70. On Wednesday, Gov. Pat McCrory and other dignitaries unveiled a “future U.S. Interstate 70†sign on U.S. 70 in Goldsboro."

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...erstate-i.html

But if McCrory has proven anything, its that he's no genius.
So much fail in that article. Here's the actual sign that was unveiled. A blank space was left so a numbered interstate shield can be placed on there once AASHTO approves the number, which is I-50 apparently, in May.
Attached Thumbnails
Proposed I-795 Quad East loop-future-interstate.jpg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2016, 06:03 PM
 
275 posts, read 330,618 times
Reputation: 244
I also wonder if it means they will re number NC 50. When the interstate is done there will be 2 50s in Garner
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2016, 06:07 PM
 
1,291 posts, read 1,597,631 times
Reputation: 782
Overworked, underpaid local journalists see highway + interstate + 70 + future and conflate it to I-70. It's just how media works now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2016, 09:42 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
21,020 posts, read 27,239,632 times
Reputation: 5997
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarnetAndBlack View Post
Media isn't usually right on details like this anymore, sadly.

I don't understand why I-50 if they want I-44 on what's currently 64... it's out of pattern (not the first time, though).
Interstate 44 is already in use from Wichita Falls, Texas, to Saint Louis, Missouri.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2016, 05:35 AM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,821,351 times
Reputation: 4824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. ENC View Post
I also wonder if it means they will re number NC 50. When the interstate is done there will be 2 50s in Garner
Well...they wouldn't be required to change it, so I guess it would depend on how much driver confusion there is, but I doubt it will change. NC-50 runs from Creedmoor north of Raleigh all the way down to Topsail Beach, so it'll likely cost more than it's worth to change the signs along a 164 mile route, so NCDOT would probably figure that it's not worth the expense just because a few confused drivers either can't or are too lazy to read a map. That's my guess, anyway. Most people can tell an interstate sign from state highway sign and know it's not the same road (540 being the exception to that rule due to the tolls). NCDOT members were present at the Super 70 Corridor Commission's meeting and none of them raised any objections to the Commission's request to use I-50 for the US-70 corridor. AASHTO's deadline for numbering applications is April 18, so NCDOT has until then to sent the I-50 request. AASHTO's Special Committee on US Route Numbering meets on May 24. FHWA will still need to sign off on it if (likely when) AASHTO approves the number.

Last edited by LM117; 04-01-2016 at 05:52 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2016, 05:58 AM
 
263 posts, read 572,344 times
Reputation: 300
I'd be surprised if AASHTO approved using I-50 for this route. Two-digit interstates divisible by 5 are supposed to be major highways running long distances. This would probably be the shorest "divisible by 5" interstate in the country.

I-38 or I-42 would be more appropriate, or even a 3-digit based on I-40 or I-95. But not I-50...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Coastal North Carolina
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top