Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado > Colorado Springs
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-02-2015, 04:54 AM
Status: "Nothin' to lose" (set 10 days ago)
 
Location: Concord, CA
7,184 posts, read 9,317,614 times
Reputation: 25622

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcy1210 View Post
100 stories? This isn't Dubai, it's Colorado Springs.
No way would a 100 story building make sense here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-02-2015, 09:14 AM
 
3,490 posts, read 6,099,388 times
Reputation: 5421
Don't we have any city ordinance banning absurdly tall structures? I favor those ordinances because we have beautiful mountains for all to see and if he were to destroy the views he should be sued in class action.

If he wishes to buy up more land and have a series of 10 to 15 story buildings, I would have no problem so long as he also builds the necessary parking structures for each employ that is to be brought there. We have one of the few reasonable downtown areas that is both nice and not absurdly expensive to park in. It would be a shame to see that destroyed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2015, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Downtown Co Springs
208 posts, read 305,524 times
Reputation: 334
Quote:
Originally Posted by lurtsman View Post
Don't we have any city ordinance banning absurdly tall structures?
If so, we should have one against sprawl too . Let's just not grow the city in any direction
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2015, 10:12 AM
 
Location: The Springs
1,778 posts, read 2,885,666 times
Reputation: 1891
Yeah, I have a hard time picturing it. The skyline would appear like a middle finger giving you the bird. But I'll take 30 stories if he can manage it. That I believe may be feasible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2015, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
553 posts, read 1,635,955 times
Reputation: 504
Quote:
Originally Posted by lurtsman View Post
..... and if he were to destroy the views he should be sued in class action.....
But, you don't own the view.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2015, 03:25 PM
 
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
11,157 posts, read 14,001,750 times
Reputation: 14940
How funny. Earlier today I said on another thread that I considered it unlikely any significant highrises would be built in Colorado Springs for the foreseeable future. I consider this 100 story tower proposal laughably unlikely, but wouldn't be surprised to see Sanders Pursue a 30 story residential tower. Maybe multiple 30 story and below towers. I definitely prefer they be residential towers because that brings population to downtown and revitalizes it. It could spur additional commercial development and catapult the city forward.

Or it could all be speculation.

I am not against a moderate amount of high rise development for the city, but I also feel it would be tragic for the city to block out an amazing background like Pike's Peak. I think 400 feet should be as tall as they build.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2015, 04:39 PM
 
26,212 posts, read 49,038,592 times
Reputation: 31781
Quote:
Originally Posted by iknowftbll View Post
How funny. Earlier today I said on another thread that I considered it unlikely any significant highrises would be built in Colorado Springs for the foreseeable future. I consider this 100 story tower proposal laughably unlikely, but wouldn't be surprised to see Sanders Pursue a 30 story residential tower. Maybe multiple 30 story and below towers. I definitely prefer they be residential towers because that brings population to downtown and revitalizes it. It could spur additional commercial development and catapult the city forward.

Or it could all be speculation.

I am not against a moderate amount of high rise development for the city, but I also feel it would be tragic for the city to block out an amazing background like Pike's Peak. I think 400 feet should be as tall as they build.
Agree. Ten years of moderating and reading every posting in the COLO forums has shown me that more and more people want to live in a walkable city. We actually have a walkable and bikeable downtown, with some good eateries, a small movie house, coffee shops, small retail shops, a park (with its share of homeless) and some transit in the immediate downtown area.

Big time / big box retail is NOT coming to downtown COLO SPGS, it's going along Powers Blvd, North Academy and North Nevada, which makes downtown ideal for dwellings. It isn't all that far from downtown to the better shopping but I can't imagine major shopping ever coming to downtown.
__________________
- Please follow our TOS.
- Any Questions about City-Data? See the FAQ list.
- Want some detailed instructions on using the site? See The Guide for plain english explanation.
- Realtors are welcome here but do see our Realtor Advice to avoid infractions.
- Thank you and enjoy City-Data.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2015, 04:54 PM
 
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
11,157 posts, read 14,001,750 times
Reputation: 14940
^ It may be better that way. I know a lot of people knock Denver for lack of a large department store/s downtown but it doesn't seem to suffer for it.

I'd like to see a couple mid-rise residential towers downtown and ensuing commercial development. More small business: shops, restaurants, bar/grill type places. I'd love to see the stadium built and think the Sky Sox owner is an idiot for not wanting to move. I think what he'd lose in parking revenue he would more than make up for in ticket sales and a boost in concessions. With that said, I believe the stadium should go up with or without the Sky Sox being on board. It's an investment in a part of the city that needs it. Maybe they could lure a Major League Soccer team into town. The foot traffic before and after games would really enhance other businesses. A stadium would likely be a casual draw for downtown residents, too.

Colorado Springs is a city with an immense amount of potential. It has its problems but it's a great place with a lot of upside. A few improvements here and there would really carry it a long way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2015, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
3,961 posts, read 4,389,750 times
Reputation: 5273
The biggest issue to downtown growth is the 66 acres that constitute the Drake power plant. Its big, its ugly, people don't want to live and recreate next to it, and its paid for and produces inexpensive power. To eliminate it for an alternate plant could easily cost everyone on Cos an additional $20 a month on their utility bill for the next generation to come to create an area that a large % of the city won't ever visit, but will incessantly complain about in their monthly bill.

Despite that, there are already 356 residential units in the planning and permitting stages in the downtown area. Work is being pushed by Norwood Development and Griffis Blessing for these units which will be on the southwest corner of Colo Ave and Wahsatch and 600 block of south Cascade.

There is already a mixed use retail and residential unit being built at 400 S Nevada. Iron Bird Brewing has already signed a lease on a portion of the commercial space and the apartments are under construction.

I wouldn't be surprised to see any future investors sitting back and watching how these currently planned units go over and how the whole City of Champions projects proceed before they actually push for high rise living.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2015, 05:38 PM
 
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
11,157 posts, read 14,001,750 times
Reputation: 14940
I agree the plant is a horrible eyesore downtown and it is not likely or practical to replace it. But Colorado Springs isn't alone in this regard. In fact, Minneapolis built a baseball stadium for the Twins adjacent to a power plant where refuse is burned as fuel. If the plant can be cordoned off from downtown by a parking structure or something like that it'll feel separated from the city and its presence there less of a buzz kill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado > Colorado Springs

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top