Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-05-2014, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,464,513 times
Reputation: 4395

Advertisements

River Basins above 100%:

GUNNISON RIVER BASIN 106%

UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN 125%

SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN 137%

LARAMIE AND NORTH PLATTE RIVER BASINS 139%

YAMPA AND WHITE RIVER BASINS 125%

ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN 103%

River basins below 100%

UPPER RIO GRANDE BASIN 81%

SAN MIGUEL, DOLORES, ANIMAS AND SAN JUAN RIVER BASINS 85%

The link: http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/reports...+Update+Report

 
Old 04-06-2014, 12:25 AM
 
Location: Pikes Peak Region
481 posts, read 1,301,112 times
Reputation: 826
^ Excellent post. It makes me feel better about snowpacks in Colorado, for sure. But where do they draw the median line? 10 years, 20 years? It's a good sign but I'm still leery and unconvinced.
 
Old 04-06-2014, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,464,513 times
Reputation: 4395
That is something they have been doing for decades and have it down to a science. If you really want to know I'm sure you can google it.
 
Old 04-06-2014, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Pikes Peak Region
481 posts, read 1,301,112 times
Reputation: 826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josseppie View Post
That is something they have been doing for decades and have it down to a science. If you really want to know I'm sure you can google it.
Good information, thanks for that. Considering most of the Front Range water comes from snow melt I'm glad to see some information other than doom and gloom. Now if it would just snow enough to make a difference on the Front Range! What a weak March we had, in terms of precipitation.

Last edited by Littlekw; 04-06-2014 at 12:20 PM..
 
Old 04-06-2014, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,464,513 times
Reputation: 4395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Littlekw View Post
Good information, thanks for that. Considering most of the Front Range water comes from snow melt I'm glad to see some information other than doom and gloom. Now of it would just snow enough to make a difference on the Front Range! What a weak March we had, in terms of precipitation.
Honestly I am not worried about the water situation this summer in Pueblo.
 
Old 04-06-2014, 12:12 PM
 
8,317 posts, read 29,476,427 times
Reputation: 9306
Snotel 30-year median averages follow the World Meteorological Standards for data collection and reporting. Read here:

30-Year Climatic and Hydrologic

As far as other weather reporting stations aside from Snotel, one of the big problems in Colorado climate averages reporting for precipitation, temperatures, etc. has been that a lot of co-operative weather stations--those operated by volunteers--have been disappearing in the last couple of decades. Go to the Western Regional Climate Center and click on many Colorado weather station locations and the result will come up with no data available. Others have old data that doesn't reflect current climate trends. The co-op weather station system has always been the backbone of the National Weather Service data-gathering system and it is slowly withering away. The same is occurring with the National Weather Service's own employee-maintained weather stations and bureaus. A lot of them are gone now.
 
Old 04-06-2014, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Aurora, CO
8,606 posts, read 14,894,836 times
Reputation: 15400
Got to experience a weather smorgasbord today. Took my oldest to the Rockies game and sun gave way to rain, followed by 20 minutes of snow, then sun for the rest of the game. Our trip home contained a very brief, minor thundersnow.
 
Old 04-06-2014, 08:21 PM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,464,513 times
Reputation: 4395
Sadly it was too warm for snow in Pueblo but we had rain.
 
Old 04-06-2014, 09:59 PM
 
Location: CO/UT/AZ/NM Catch me if you can!
6,927 posts, read 6,938,652 times
Reputation: 16509
^ Count your blessings, kid. We had cold, dry winds. There was maybe 16 drops of precip tonight out here. I caught them in a jar to save and show my friends' grandchildren someday.
 
Old 04-07-2014, 10:12 AM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,464,513 times
Reputation: 4395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado Rambler View Post
^ Count your blessings, kid. We had cold, dry winds. There was maybe 16 drops of precip tonight out here. I caught them in a jar to save and show my friends' grandchildren someday.
Once May comes I will feel different about the rain but I am still in winter mode and prefer snow. So when it rains I feel its a waste of a good storm.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top