Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-17-2015, 12:39 PM
 
Location: New England
242 posts, read 350,995 times
Reputation: 339

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beeker2211 View Post
Did you also get a terrain expert to see if there are groundswell/heaving issues? It might be worth the few bucks if you go for repouring the foundation...
Not a bad idea - I'll run this by our structural engineer to see if he thinks it's worthwhile. I appreciate your comment, Beeker.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-17-2015, 12:47 PM
 
453 posts, read 530,909 times
Reputation: 287
Quote:
Originally Posted by WouldLoveTo View Post
From the article "Walter Zaldwy built his home in 1988 in Willington. He says J.J. Mottes supplied the concrete for his foundation. He never questioned why his insurance company sent him a notice in 2008 stating his foundation would no longer be covered – until he started noticing the spider cracks on his walls growing within the last year. "Looking back, I’m wondering, how did they get this information to decide they weren’t covering basement foundations anymore?" Zaldwy said."


His policy was changed 10 years after he bought the house.
I missed that, but it was probably due to standard wording changes (clarifications to gray areas of coverage) which happen frequently. Not insulting this person, and I admit at times takes a lawyer to decipher policy language, but the general lay person misinterprets insurance contracts often.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2015, 10:51 AM
 
9,911 posts, read 7,697,498 times
Reputation: 2494
Huh read up on it that is terrible. Guess most insurance companies don't cover compression and expansion regarding the foundation. Best of luck in everything only thing I can see being done is a second mortgage or a finance plan with the contractor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2015, 09:40 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
5,104 posts, read 4,833,833 times
Reputation: 3636
I have seen the reports on the news and IMO some people certainly knew of the issue before the general public knew about it. What I thought was especially funny was the reporter from NBC asked UCONN if the concrete company was being used on any project on campus and they said NO. The reporter however found and filmed a truck from that company pouring concrete on the UCONN campus very recently. Someone didn't get the memo at UCONN I suppose.

In the end the only people who will get any satisfaction from this fiasco will be the lawyers. Unless the state of CT does something to fix these issues (and I don't see why they would) a class action lawsuit is probably the only answer and the only way people who are affected will get any satisfaction/remediation. As a result of that class action the concrete company will go out of business and their insurance company will only cover losses up to a point. I'm sure there's a liability limit on the [concrete company's policy] and they will exceed that. After all that is sorted out the class action lawyers will get 40% of the settlement.

FWIW, if I was one of the homeowners affected I would be filing my civil suit in court ASAP and not wait around for any class action lawyers to show up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2016, 09:22 AM
 
Location: New England
242 posts, read 350,995 times
Reputation: 339
Just heard about this one: Failing Foundation Leaves Stafford Woman With Few Options | NBC Connecticut

The thing that really boggles my mind about the situation is that the concrete company (JJ Mottes in Stafford) is STILL using the same aggregate in its concrete mixes, which means that this could be a problem in northeastern CT for many years to come.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2016, 10:39 AM
 
83 posts, read 129,189 times
Reputation: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaIceman View Post
Anybody buying a house in eastern Connecticut needs to be aware of this issue, and make sure that the house you're looking at has been inspected by a structural engineer who is aware of the problem and knows the signs to look for.
....Did you NOT have the foundation of your house inspected, or...?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2016, 10:43 AM
 
Location: New England
242 posts, read 350,995 times
Reputation: 339
Quote:
Originally Posted by fearlessly View Post
....Did you NOT have the foundation of your house inspected, or...?
Of course we did. However, it takes time for the problem to manifest, so back when we bought our home (2000) there were no visible cracks. There are now.

It's not just our house - there are 3 others on just my small street that are having the same problem. Be thankful it's not your house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2016, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,515 posts, read 75,294,816 times
Reputation: 16619
Nice discussion guys. Interesting about the insurance companies knowing.


Also interesting how they started using "that cement" during the real estate Boom. Almost to say "lets hurry and build this so we can sell and move on to the next project". As if buyers didn't care, they just wanted to buy..and builders wanted to use cheap stuff to make more profits


Then again, was this a local thing? State thing? Or National thing? And lastly... will "you" even be in the home long enough to witness it crumbling?


Next, we should look into the "paper" our homes are made of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2016, 04:12 AM
 
468 posts, read 523,867 times
Reputation: 456
I hadn't heard about this until you posted. I talked to a colleague who said that on a street near him in Willington, ten houses are affected.

It's horrible. I would be devastated if my house were one of the ones with the problem. I hope the state really steps up. I think whoever now owns Motte's should be liable- when you buy a business, you buy their assets and their liabilities. If they're still getting contracts from UConn, that money should go straight into a fund to help pay for this. I'd even be in favor of the State setting up a fund to help compensate affected homeowners.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2016, 08:22 PM
 
Location: Arizona
475 posts, read 318,328 times
Reputation: 2456
We own a condo at Laurel Hill in Stafford Springs. Last I heard they know that 3 of the self standing units are affected...people are in the beginning stages of having their units inspected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top