Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-11-2015, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,171 posts, read 26,187,400 times
Reputation: 27914

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
Schools can have reasonable, relatively specific guidelines on recommended lunch items, and parents could get a letter from school for not following them, but it is patently absurd for teachers to take away stuff they feel are not healthy. Anything in moderation is usually fine, and many teachers have shown to be ignorant about nutrition.

But why the hell would you give your kid (repeatedly apparently) friggin' slim jims? Do you want her to get a colon cancer at the ripe age of 9?

Mick
Strange to have these two sentences from the same poster.
And where did you read that is was repeatedly??
I hope you do know how absurd that last sentence is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-11-2015, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,529,442 times
Reputation: 24780
Lightbulb Solution...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dude111 View Post
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/shopping-and-consumer-news/11663553/Scotch-eggs-branded-junk-food-and-confiscated-from-childrens-packed-lunches.html

If teachers deem it NOT HEALTHY!! (Isnt that the state telling you what ya kids can/cant eat?)

Next time you're in the UK, avoid Colchester or at least don't let the teachers grab your sack lunch.

You'll be OK.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 11:16 AM
 
520 posts, read 532,149 times
Reputation: 821
And I say good for the schools. And Im not the least bit liberal. These fat slobs are going to cost our entitlement programs and all of us more and more and more unless its controlled soon. You should see the projections in the out years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 11:17 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,529,442 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Meyers View Post
And I say good for the schools. And Im not the least bit liberal. These fat slobs are going to cost our entitlement programs and all of us more and more and more unless its controlled soon. You should see the projections in the out years.

The UK's entitlement programs don't cost us American taxpayers a dime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,460,154 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Meyers View Post
And I say good for the schools. And Im not the least bit liberal. These fat slobs are going to cost our entitlement programs and all of us more and more and more unless its controlled soon. You should see the projections in the out years.
We don't fund entitlement programs in the UK.

Did you read the article ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 11:19 AM
 
520 posts, read 532,149 times
Reputation: 821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
The UK's entitlement programs don't cost us American taxpayers a dime.
Im sure they suffer the exact same way with their NHS and obesity/ diabetes costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,597,285 times
Reputation: 7801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dude111 View Post
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/shopping-and-consumer-news/11663553/Scotch-eggs-branded-junk-food-and-confiscated-from-childrens-packed-lunches.html

If teachers deem it NOT HEALTHY!! (Isnt that the state telling you what ya kids can/cant eat?)
Oh, this wasn't in the US.

Let some teacher remove any food item from my kid's lunch and I would go off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 11:21 AM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,615,791 times
Reputation: 21097
The USA has Michelle Obama watching over what kids get to eat for lunch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 11:22 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,460,154 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Meyers View Post
Im sure they suffer the exact same way with their NHS and obesity/ diabetes costs.
Why punish everyone though ?
How does one get an obesity waiver ?

Why do you assume everyone that eats a lunch not sanctified by the government is obese ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 12:01 PM
 
Location: White House, TN
6,486 posts, read 6,181,267 times
Reputation: 4584
Why should the school/teachers be able to say "What you brought for your child is unhealthy, we're going to TAKE IT?" That is 100% wrong. So what if a student shows up to school with a Slim Jim? Or Big Mac, for that matter? Back when I was in elementary school (1998-2004) no one would have dared thought "It's okay to take students' packed lunches." I got McDonalds a couple of times, I think during my time in elementary school they introduced a policy of no lunches brought from off campus. Heck, by high school (2007-2011) some of my friends went off campus and got McDonalds occasionally (around 2010-2011). They had a dual enrollment college class (I wasn't in it, so I missed out on the Mickey D's... and I didn't have a car until May 2012). The best way to combat this "nanny school" trend is to go back to the past. About 1995 ought to be fine, and stay there. Let the parents eat with their kids in elementary school and bring in McDonalds if they want to. Let the high schoolers with cars go off campus and eat. And for heck's sake DO NOT ALLOW SCHOOLS TO TAKE FOOD FROM STUDENTS THAT THEY DEEM "UNHEALTHY"!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top