Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh dear. Rolling Stone is trying to appeal to the liberals again.
Isn't all media basically owned by the Libs, tho?
Huff Post, Rolling Stone- all the garbage on tv, etc. etc.
All have an agenda-
And the mindless fools who blindly follow buy into it just disgust me.......
Isn't all media basically owned by the Libs, tho?
Huff Post, Rolling Stone- all the garbage on tv, etc. etc.
All have an agenda-
And the mindless fools who blindly follow buy into it just disgust me.......
Nope, you got it exactly backwards, media conglomerates are not liberal at all.
Rolling Stone did not write the article, Paul Krugman did and his bonafides as to being in a position to know are well established. Would it make any difference to you if The Wall Street Journal had published it? How about The Christian Science Monitor? Waste of a posting opportunity.
as neither a dem or rep, I can be a little more unbiased than rolling stone, my opinion is obama is 'ok' at best a 4 or maybe 5 out of 10 rating.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
