Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-08-2011, 08:18 AM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
13,138 posts, read 22,815,703 times
Reputation: 14116

Advertisements

It happened yet again... things were looking up, markets were experienceing a modest recovery and in the background oil prices creeped up to ridiculous prices. Suddenly, the dominoes trip and a whole series of seemingly completely unrelated economic woes fall upon us.

The same pattern seems to repeat itself with every recession since the 70's.

Yet nobody in the media ever draws the connection?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-08-2011, 08:47 AM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,546,851 times
Reputation: 4949
Slight, but significant correction on your thesis?

Trying to stay with the Last Century Technology (Oil, that is) is the "Achillies heel" of our economy. . .

At this point, no one is making more of the stuff -- at least in any useful quantities, we are still burning it like fiends, and we are going broke doing so, while going around the world murdering countries and people to do so.

Had and caused enough pain, yet?

Time to give it up and move on to something Faster, Better, Cheaper, and Cleaner.

But some habits and addictions can be hard to break.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Business ethics is an oxymoron.
2,347 posts, read 3,334,280 times
Reputation: 5382
Folks out there have been trying to find viable alternatives to oil since at least the '73 shortage. Everything from more efficient engines to french fry oil to moonshine to algae has been used, all with little or no potential.

Don't you think that if such an alternative existed, we'd be using it?

Show me something that is not oil based fuel (or requires oil to produce-a key point often left out of the equations) that would

  • Just plain work.
  • Allow us to at least maintain our current standard of living
  • Be affordable to the masses as opposed to just the limousine Liberal Hollywood elite who are really just posing for the cameras
  • Not bankrupt the economy
  • Not trade one problem for another (for instance where is all that lithium for those batteries going to come from?)
  • Not send us back to the 18th Century in terms of mobility
Unless your REAL motive is to roll us back a century or two (if it is-just say so), if you can show us how getting off oil is even possible, we're listening.

My experience has been that nine times out of ten, when someone wants to "ban oil", what they really MEAN is: "I'm resentful/jealous of the Suburban lifestyle. I can't have it so I want to take it away from those who do".

Well?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 08:58 AM
 
10,494 posts, read 27,244,020 times
Reputation: 6718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chango View Post
It happened yet again... things were looking up, markets were experienceing a modest recovery and in the background oil prices creeped up to ridiculous prices. Suddenly, the dominoes trip and a whole series of seemingly completely unrelated economic woes fall upon us.

The same pattern seems to repeat itself with every recession since the 70's.

Yet nobody in the media ever draws the connection?
The phony modest recovery was caused by QE2 which also had the side effect of raising gas prices. It was unsustainable as the policies that caused the recession were never changed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 01:09 PM
 
5,730 posts, read 10,127,514 times
Reputation: 8052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Des-Lab View Post
Folks out there have been trying to find viable alternatives to oil since at least the '73 shortage. Everything from more efficient engines to french fry oil to moonshine to algae has been used, all with little or no potential.

Don't you think that if such an alternative existed, we'd be using it?

Not when there is so much money being made by the 'oil monopoly' and those with a vested interest use BILLIONS to stifle/buy up alternatives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Business ethics is an oxymoron.
2,347 posts, read 3,334,280 times
Reputation: 5382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Themanwithnoname View Post
Not when there is so much money being made by the 'oil monopoly' and those with a vested interest use BILLIONS to stifle/buy up alternatives.
I call BS on this one. The oil companies aren't JUST into oil per se. They are into energy. And believe me. If something out there existed that had the same density and return on investment, they'd be marketing it. Like I said Even if something out there does exist, it's not without one of the tradeoffs I mentioned above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 04:08 PM
 
5,730 posts, read 10,127,514 times
Reputation: 8052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Des-Lab View Post
I call BS on this one. The oil companies aren't JUST into oil per se. They are into energy. And believe me. If something out there existed that had the same density and return on investment, they'd be marketing it. Like I said Even if something out there does exist, it's not without one of the tradeoffs I mentioned above.
So your saying that the oil companies have NOT bought up rights to devices which made vehicles more efficient, alternate energy etc...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 05:49 PM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,546,851 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Des-Lab View Post
Folks out there have been trying to find viable alternatives to oil since at least the '73 shortage. Everything from more efficient engines to french fry oil to moonshine to algae has been used, all with little or no potential.

Don't you think that if such an alternative existed, we'd be using it?
Oh, no. Not at all. I deal a fair amount in the Real World, and Real World people do not quit entrenched habits and addictions until they experience some real pain to move them forward.

Ever study anything on how things "advanced" from horses to automobiles? The horses just became too painful to deal with. Mountains of horse-poop, dead horses choking streets in the cities. Only a little over 100 years ago, but all now faded from our cultural memory as we have pretty much turned horses into pets (or meat )

This is an excellent and fun read on that topic >>>

Called Horses to Horsepower.

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q...TXlEuBz-gi51KA


Quote:
Show me something that is not oil based fuel (or requires oil to produce-a key point often left out of the equations) that would
Okkkkaaayyyy. btw, normally I charge a lot for design work, but since you asked so nice, here we go . . . .

Quote:
  • Just plain work.
  • Allow us to at least maintain our current standard of living
  • Be affordable to the masses as opposed to just the limousine Liberal Hollywood elite who are really just posing for the cameras
  • Not bankrupt the economy
  • Not trade one problem for another (for instance where is all that lithium for those batteries going to come from?)
  • Not send us back to the 18th Century in terms of mobility
Nice List. Really.

Getting the Specifications correct upfront are a very good part of any design.

With Real Life customers, I tell them that I am sort of like a waitress – trying to understand what they want, to make sure it all gets cooked and served they way they would like it. Starts with good specifications.

Quote:

Unless your REAL motive is to roll us back a century or two (if it is-just say so), if you can show us how getting off oil is even possible, we're listening.
Yunno, I would have thought -- what is THAT nutcase going on about? . . . If I had not run across exactly what you are talking about in a genre of characters who nominally describe themselves as "doomers." But no, I am not a doomer, nor great leap backwards type. I suppose they may call me a Techno-Cornucopian, if you are familiar.

Quote:
My experience has been that nine times out of ten, when someone wants to "ban oil", what they really MEAN is: "I'm resentful/jealous of the Suburban lifestyle. I can't have it so I want to take it away from those who do".

Well?
No, actually I make Good Money from Oil. And other energy, as well, but since I do not do Nukes, Oil is the top dollar customer from my side of things. I do Oil related design for wells, distribution, refineries, and instrumentation and controls for the same.

As far as our present life-style, I guess we are a little further out (from the city) than suburban towards what are sometimes called Fringe or Ex-urban, but our location is partly because I am doing Electric Farming projects now, as well, and we landed in a really Good School District (for the kids) -- and we rent relatively cheap, as the higher dollar housing around here is un-sellable.

But now, as far as real work, I am trying to focus mostly on Renewables. Mostly an ethics and long-term life on the Planet thing. We can go into that, but you probably already get it.

But towards your spec list –

Short answer is Grid Powered Electric Roadway and Cars and Trucks.

But let’s do your list?
---------------------------------

Just Plain Work. Ok. Electric anything is generally considered some of the most reliable systems -- I guess maybe other some mechanical/gravity based equipment has higher reliability. Pretty hard to mess gravity up.

In Electric Land, the only recent "really bad design" electrical system I have observed was the back-up Power System (Generators) for the Fukey Nukey in Japan. After the sea water wave hit the back-up generators -- it was pretty much Game Over for them.

--------------------------

Allow us to at least maintain our current standard of living. I would normally caution that our “current standard of living,” is highly debt based – largely because of Oil. But you already know that and I am sure we can do much better.

Since we would stop losing money to the Transnational Corporation Oil Trade, and would be generating all our own power, here – we all should be doing Much Better.

--------------------------------

Be affordable to the masses. Good on that one, too. A typical Grid-Powered Electric Car should cost about 1/2 of a Internal Combustion Engine, and the “fuel” cost about 1/4, with a service life of around 500,000 or more miles.

----------------------------------

Not bankrupt the economy. I would think the opposite. As we would stop spending money on imported Oil, and probably have near full employment doing the swap toward Grid Powered Roads and Cars, I sort of suspect it would not only not bankrupt US, but probably bring US well out of debt and into profit.

------------------------------------

Not trade one problem for another. Pretty hard and vague spec, there. Like the horse to auto conversion from above -- it cured their Horse Poop problems, but here some 100 years later, we have discovered that cure -- Oil, as it were -- has problems, as well.

Probably some truth in Einstein's observation -- "You can never solve a problem on the level on which it was created."

But I would think, this could cover the next 100 years without any real problems. I suppose the “7-Generations” consideration may be a valid approach on this line of thinking.

By the way, just to jump past the painful exchanges regarding batteries . . . . I never said anything about batteries. That was your entry into the conversation. So you can do the arguments with anyone who wants to talk about batteries. Not my thing. Batteries are not required for a grid-powered roadway system in any fashion greater than the existing batteries which all cars already have.
-------------------------------------

Not send us back to the 18th Century . . . If anyone has read down this far, and not hit that Horses to Horse-Power link – go back and look at that, to really get a grip on where we have came from.

But no, I would think this should be Better, Faster, Cheaper, Cleaner, and Safer than our present “fleet” of Oil/Gasoline burners.

---------------------------------------

So . . . or “Well,” as you say -- Good Enough?

Or would you like to add to or modify your spec list?

Last edited by Philip T; 08-08-2011 at 06:01 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 06:26 PM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,198,208 times
Reputation: 4801
Quote:
Originally Posted by las vegas drunk View Post
The phony modest recovery was caused by QE2
QE2 began in November 2010.

Which economic indicator of recovery are you looking at that started after that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2011, 07:01 PM
 
4,246 posts, read 12,026,260 times
Reputation: 3150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Themanwithnoname View Post
So your saying that the oil companies have NOT bought up rights to devices which made vehicles more efficient, alternate energy etc...

Like what?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top