Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-26-2014, 07:29 PM
 
3,278 posts, read 5,392,303 times
Reputation: 4072

Advertisements

A lot of people who do a mid-level or better white collar job (accounting, etc) in a big city make at least $100k.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2014, 09:15 PM
 
9,891 posts, read 11,768,929 times
Reputation: 22087
May be true, when one computes middle income for an area they also need to consider the adjustment needed when cost of living is included . Example it is 87% more costly to live in Silicon Valley than in many other parts of the U.S. with an average cost of living.

This link shows that the real world salary for different high tech capitals of the U.S. and shows the true salary adjusted for cost of living.

Note that Austin Texas has the highest tech workers incomes in the country, and is $28,000 ahead of the Silicon Valley which is in 5th place when salaries are adjusted for cost of living.

San Jose's cost of living shot up 13% in 2013 for biggest increase ever - Silicon Valley Business Journal

And just think, California has the highest poverty rate in the entire country. Just think that San Francisco has well over 20% of the population living in poverty. Los Angeles is the most poverty stricken area in the country, with a poverty rate of nearly 27%.

You talk about the big salaries in California cities, but those salaries are for only a small portion of the population, and a high percentage live in pure poverty.

And just think Georgia and California are tied for the lowest percent of the population able to own their own homes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2014, 11:07 PM
 
6,438 posts, read 6,920,976 times
Reputation: 8743
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianjb View Post
That's great when your 18, but limits your future. I really hope parents don't encourage that behavior
…then when you do go to college, you're older and have some idea of the value of a dollar and the value of your time. Sounds like a good idea for some people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:03 AM
 
Location: Sandy Springs, GA
2,281 posts, read 3,035,578 times
Reputation: 2983
It would be a good idea for an 18 yr old to take a 60k/yr valet job. About 1.5 year's worth of work would completely pay for a college education
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:05 AM
 
Location: Florida
4,103 posts, read 5,427,707 times
Reputation: 10111
My wife and I make 94k in Jacksonville. Its by no means an expensive City but even here 94k isn't like the 80's/90's movies where someone "makes six figures" and has 4 cars, a boat, and a huge house. I cant imagine being in a City where rent is 2400 for a small place.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:08 AM
 
Location: The Triad
34,090 posts, read 82,988,469 times
Reputation: 43666
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarzanman View Post
It would be a good idea for an 18 yr old to take a 60k/yr valet job.
About 1.5 year's worth of work would completely pay for a college education
That's the theory at least.
And assuming that the $60K is a real number... it's still the starting point
and still requires far more discipline than most 18yo's will have to conserve MOST of that income.
In fact nearly all of the (net of taxes) income for several years in order to have the tuition.

A far more likely outcome is that he'll soon be a 28yo then a 38yo then a 48yo
with no marketable skills beyond the valet gig.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:15 AM
 
Location: Florida
4,103 posts, read 5,427,707 times
Reputation: 10111
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
That's the theory at least.
And assuming that the $60K is a real number... it's still the starting point
and still requires far more discipline than most 18yo's will have to conserve MOST of that income.
In fact nearly all of the (net of taxes) income for several years in order to have the tuition.

A far more likely outcome is that he'll soon be a 28yo then a 38yo then a 48yo
with no marketable skills beyond the valet gig.
Ive known quite a few people who say they'll just work for a few years and save every dime for college. Then they get a new car, nice apartment, girlfriend...then 20 years later theyre in college trying to remember what the hell a parabola is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 08:43 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,206,701 times
Reputation: 57821
Here in the Seattle area people live comfortably on $60-70K with a modest apartment, but to buy a house even $100k is pushing it. Our suburban city of 45,000 has a median family income of $135k, other nearby cities also east of Seattle are in the $110-120 median range. I can't imagine a family trying to live in San Francisco on $100k, it would be a meager lifestyle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Paranoid State
13,044 posts, read 13,869,992 times
Reputation: 15839
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianjb View Post
That's great when your 18, but limits your future. I really hope parents don't encourage that behavior
Unfortunately, it really does happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Florida
4,103 posts, read 5,427,707 times
Reputation: 10111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
Here in the Seattle area people live comfortably on $60-70K with a modest apartment, but to buy a house even $100k is pushing it. Our suburban city of 45,000 has a median family income of $135k, other nearby cities also east of Seattle are in the $110-120 median range. I can't imagine a family trying to live in San Francisco on $100k, it would be a meager lifestyle.
Ironic isn't it that the hippy haven of the baby boomers has now become a place where only the rich can afford to live. Ah Murica.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top