Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-23-2016, 01:40 PM
 
2,994 posts, read 5,587,677 times
Reputation: 4690

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by I love boots. View Post
Fixers would just rot. What incentive would there ever be to invest in real estate if you can only 2000 dollars when you resell?
The incentive to invest is because you will own your home not rent... If you are talking about investing purely to resell well tough i say. Homes are meant to be lived in not an "investment" for the sole purpose of making money in my opinion. But it's been that way for awhile and society just rolls with it like other things.

I just don't think a house made out of 40k in materials should be valued many hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2016, 02:09 PM
 
5,264 posts, read 6,401,147 times
Reputation: 6229
Quote:
I just don't think a house made out of 40k in materials should be valued many hundreds of thousands of dollars.
I think you are fighting a losing battle there that only leads to madness. Are you mad that you have to pay more than a nickel for a sandwich in a restaurant or for clothing? Materials costs in a post-scarcity society like we live in are nil. Supply for everything short of space ships is determined by regulations & classism, not by materials availability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 02:13 PM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,144,437 times
Reputation: 46680
Because you don't live in a house all your life. This isn't the 14th Century. You move from home to home as your needs dictate.

From the time I graduated college, here's where I've called home.

1) A small, incredibly cheap apartment on the wrong side of the tracks.
2) A year later, a nicer apartment in a better part of town.
3) When I was traveling 80% of the time, and because my father passed away, I moved home for a year to support my mother.
4) When I couldn't take it any more, I moved back out into a nice apartment in the entertainment district of my city.
5) When I met MrsCPG, she didn't want to live in my cool bachelor pad, so we got another apartment in a quieter neighborhood.
6) We bought a house in a neighborhood that was just beginning to gentrify. 14 years and about $30K in renovations later, we sold it for 3.5X more than we paid.
7) Because we had three children and would have gone broke paying for private schools, we moved to a nice suburb with top-notch schools, gritting our teeth all the way.
8) Ten years later, when our last child graduates next Spring, we'll be putting it on the market and moving into a cool downtown apartment while we plan Phase III of our lives.
9) After that, who knows?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 03:17 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,448,225 times
Reputation: 12318
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie1278 View Post
The incentive to invest is because you will own your home not rent... If you are talking about investing purely to resell well tough i say. Homes are meant to be lived in not an "investment" for the sole purpose of making money in my opinion. But it's been that way for awhile and society just rolls with it like other things.

I just don't think a house made out of 40k in materials should be valued many hundreds of thousands of dollars.
In any popular areas to live it's not the house that has the most value, but the land.

Reselling for a profit sometime in the future is a big part of why people buy homes, not the only reason but it's a big reason.

Also many people do buy homes as investments to rent out and never live in them. People have been doing that for a long time though hundreds of years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Athol, Idaho
2,181 posts, read 1,627,573 times
Reputation: 3220
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie1278 View Post
The incentive to invest is because you will own your home not rent... If you are talking about investing purely to resell well tough i say. Homes are meant to be lived in not an "investment" for the sole purpose of making money in my opinion. But it's been that way for awhile and society just rolls with it like other things.

I just don't think a house made out of 40k in materials should be valued many hundreds of thousands of dollars.
You're jealous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 07:03 PM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,577,181 times
Reputation: 16230
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie1278 View Post

I just don't think a house made out of 40k in materials should be valued many hundreds of thousands of dollars.
You expect people to work for free?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2016, 06:23 AM
 
Location: Southern California
4,453 posts, read 6,797,640 times
Reputation: 2238
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
Ok, what I'm trying to get at is why the relationships between the supplies and demands are what they are. Why is the supply of free and clear housing or its cash equivalent so low relative to population?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
Yes, the question is about why.
I stopped reading through the thread when it took a tangent. I think it is a question on the mentality of why people don't want to pay off their homes. Which is because they want or feel the need the spend their cash somewhere else. Then there are mechanism put in places to let people use their equity so their house never gets paid off, interest only loans, reverse mortgages. People also get sold on the idea of refinancing to a new 30 year loan to 1) reduce their monthly housing cost 2) cash out to pay for their children's college expense 3) go on vacations 4) medical expenses
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2016, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,448,225 times
Reputation: 12318
Yeah true . It seems a lot of people also use a home in order to start or fund a small business . I watch shows like Bar Rescue and The Profit and a bunch of the business owners say stuff like "I took a mortgage on my house to open this business " or " I borrowed money to keep this business going " of course these are businesses in trouble but there's got to be a lot of successful businesses out there that were started with home equity too .
Using the equity to invest in positive cash flowing real estate can be smart too

loans or equity lines can be good or they can be dangerous if used the wrong way

Gotta know what you are doing combined with some good luck
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2016, 10:34 AM
 
5,264 posts, read 6,401,147 times
Reputation: 6229
Quote:
I think it is a question on the mentality of why people don't want to pay off their homes. Which is because they want or feel the need the spend their cash somewhere else.

There is a question of morality baked into that - a mortgage payment is just a bill.

Is the same moral quandary in place about people not buying tons of food in bulk or not paying off their electric bill?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2016, 01:23 PM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,057 posts, read 31,271,982 times
Reputation: 47514
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
This is interesting. I had always heard people associate cheap houses with high crime, but there are plenty of cheap houses in the Rust Belt and South and I have a hard time believing it's all just ghettos.
They aren't all ghettos, but usually there is something "wrong" about the area.

Take the little Indiana town I mentioned in my thread on the personal finance forum - Anderson. This used to be a site of a GM plant, BorgWarner, Delco Remy, and all sorts of automotive stuff. Most of those businesses, and the jobs that went along with them, are gone now, and there hasn't been much in the way of replacement jobs. The town's population is declining, and the housing was built up for a much higher population level, so you have an oversupply of housing for the current population level, plus it's not a desirable place to live without many local jobs. The local government is short of money - roads don't get repaired, the schools are not to the quality many expect, etc. There is no natural scenery around there to move for, and not much reason to be there unless you are a local or just looking for substantially cheaper housing that is somewhat commutable to Indianapolis.

Compared to Indianapolis, crime is negligible, but the town is ugly and many houses and businesses are literally falling apart. There are probably half a dozen towns like this that I've seen throughout central Indiana that are not dangerous by any means but are not the least bit desirable for most folks.

You see much the same thing in southwest Virginia, except even more severe. The area was basically 100% dependent on coal and failed to diversify the economy. Now with the easy to get coal gone, increasing mechanization reducing the demand for workers to mine what coal is left, and unfavorable government policy, you have a complete and total mess. This area is hours away from any reasonable job center, the state government in Richmond has forgotten it, the federal government pounds it with regulation, the population continues to decline, and it's easy to see why housing pricing are cratering and there is no reason for optimism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top