Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-16-2017, 09:32 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,466 posts, read 15,256,903 times
Reputation: 14336

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by justanokie View Post
Getting rid of it or capping it will mostly effect 2nd homes in popular areas where the wealthy congregate like Aspen and the Hamptons.

Much bigger is the effect of low interest rates.




Vancouver is a silly housing market to compare to anywhere else. Chinese buyers/investors trying to export their wealth beyond reach of the Chinese government have wrecked it. Now because of the rule changes that force them to pay extra, they are moving on to Toronto, Seattle and elsewhere.
It is already capped at $1,000,000 of principal. If you own a second home in Aspen or The Hamptons, You most likely have a primary residence that has already exceeded the cap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-16-2017, 11:10 PM
 
12,022 posts, read 11,577,118 times
Reputation: 11136
The wealthy write off second home expenditures by making them part-time rentals.

Wealthy property owners becoming landlords to deduct interest on second home mortgages

Tax Rules On Renting Your Vacation Home
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2017, 12:43 AM
 
10,762 posts, read 5,680,240 times
Reputation: 10884
Quote:
Originally Posted by lchoro View Post
I’m curious, do you think that “the wealthy” are somehow getting away with something that they shouldn’t as a result of these rules?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2017, 12:55 AM
 
Location: NNJ
15,074 posts, read 10,108,006 times
Reputation: 17276
I'm no expert.. just observations.

* Cheap mortgage interest rates. People willing to pay more. Rates were much higher when I bought my home (first time buyer) when housing was far cheaper. Got the purchase price locked in albeit at a much higher rate than today. Then refinanced a couple times to get rid of PMI and get a rate that is 1/3rd of my original.

* Areas with high property taxes seem to have cheaper prices on comparable homes of areas that are lower in property tax.

In reality, people are focused on the monthly payment. So I would guess.. yes... deductions do since it contributes to the final cost annually.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2017, 04:37 AM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,552,235 times
Reputation: 35437
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd View Post
I’m curious, do you think that “the wealthy” are somehow getting away with something that they shouldn’t as a result of these rules?
Theire not. People like to get on the “it’s the wealthy who get all the breaks” bandwagon. AFAIK anyone who pays taxes can use the tax code equally and deduct whatever is allowable. If someone doesn’t have that second home to deduct it isn’t the wealthy guys fault. But people like to blame the wealthy as they are “unfairly getting away with it”
I deduct my rentals. But why shouldn’t I? I took the risks, put up the money. Oh yeah just like anyone else in the country can. ......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2017, 05:20 AM
 
698 posts, read 568,239 times
Reputation: 864
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuiteLiving View Post
so what percentage of the pool of potential buyers will disappear that you consider to be "significant"? You must have a sense for it since you used that particular qualifier.
What I have a sense for is the desperation inherent in your post. It too is significant.

Last edited by VendorDude; 11-17-2017 at 05:44 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2017, 05:25 AM
 
698 posts, read 568,239 times
Reputation: 864
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
...the government doesnt have a right to influence the value of people's homes or manipulate people's actions by imposing taxes or tax benefits on specific things.
In the real world, using the tax code to encourage socially beneficial behavior and discourage that which is socially destructive is part and parcel of what a representative government is all about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2017, 05:30 AM
 
698 posts, read 568,239 times
Reputation: 864
Quote:
Originally Posted by jiminnm View Post
The fact that you blithely equate eliminating the mortgage interest deduction with the economic crisis of a decade ago demonstrates why people should not pay any further attention to your comments.
The facts here are that you give no indication of understanding markets and how or why housing markets in particular were affected in 2006 and thereafter or would be again if the home mortgage interest deduction were eliminated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2017, 05:37 AM
 
698 posts, read 568,239 times
Reputation: 864
Quote:
Originally Posted by blazerj View Post
Real estate prices will go down, because of the reduced incentive to own a 2nd home.
How would that be different from what happened at the start of the Great Recession?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2017, 05:41 AM
 
698 posts, read 568,239 times
Reputation: 864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jstarling View Post
PMI still holds true and now is for the life of the mortgage not just until you hit 20% equity.
Under the Homeowner's Protection Act, your mortgage lender is legally required to cancel your PMI coverage once you pay down your mortgage to 78% of the principal, as long as you are current on your payments and do not have an FHA loan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top