Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-20-2017, 05:34 PM
 
Location: Cebu, Philippines
5,869 posts, read 4,214,071 times
Reputation: 10942

Advertisements

The only thing that can be done is to confiscate the property of the rich, who are just keeping all their wealth stuck up their butt like a thermometer measuring their worth. And that is not going to happen. Not peaceably.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy

There is an economic theory that no matter what economic system you start out with, it will evolve into an Oligarchy. Ours already has.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-21-2017, 04:40 AM
 
106,718 posts, read 108,913,061 times
Reputation: 80208
Quote:
Originally Posted by MLSFan View Post
another example, if I walked into a room, and randomly gave out $1,$5,$10,$100 etc. is it unfair because you didn't get the $100 instead of the $1? but it wasn't your money to begin with, why should you decide how "fair" I should be when I give it out?

this is what I think people don't realize when they complain about jobs. you aren't there to hold out your hand and hope for a good lottery draw. what you can offer impacts what someone is willing to give to you

what people should want most is not to be excluded, not that they didn't get the same as everyone else

"fairness" is not real, even from your own home, do you eat the exact same amount as your family members? if not, why do you not force feed the toddler the same amount as the adult so the kid can get the same fair amount? or withhold food from the adult so he isn't getting an unfair amount?

it's laughable that the people who cry income inequality talk about fairness, is there a reason they think the world needs to be based on "fairness"?
i think that pretty much sums up how it is in the real world .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2017, 05:35 AM
 
Location: Central IL
20,722 posts, read 16,386,025 times
Reputation: 50380
Quote:
Originally Posted by MLSFan View Post
another example, if I walked into a room, and randomly gave out $1,$5,$10,$100 etc. is it unfair because you didn't get the $100 instead of the $1? but it wasn't your money to begin with, why should you decide how "fair" I should be when I give it out?

this is what I think people don't realize when they complain about jobs. you aren't there to hold out your hand and hope for a good lottery draw. what you can offer impacts what someone is willing to give to you

what people should want most is not to be excluded, not that they didn't get the same as everyone else

"fairness" is not real, even from your own home, do you eat the exact same amount as your family members? if not, why do you not force feed the toddler the same amount as the adult so the kid can get the same fair amount? or withhold food from the adult so he isn't getting an unfair amount?

it's laughable that the people who cry income inequality talk about fairness, is there a reason they think the world needs to be based on "fairness"?
What's laughable is assuming that everyone earns what they should based on their contribution - that this is based on merit? People who are routinely overlooked realize we don't live in a meritocracy and that some can be smart and work very hard and make little.

What's laughable is not understanding that in your own home I hope everyone eats the amount that they NEED.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2017, 06:40 AM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,471 posts, read 61,423,512 times
Reputation: 30439
Quote:
Originally Posted by hikernut View Post
A small number of estates, yes, but not a small amount of money. And in my mind it's not so much about the taxes that could be raised, but rather a way to encourage wealthy people to do something constructive with their money while they are alive. Tackle the eradication of a disease, space travel, energy efficiency, etc. Corporations today are less willing to do fundamental research than in the past, and this could be a way to encourage that sort of effort without getting governments directly involved.

Inherited money will more likely be spent on vacations, expensive cars, estates costing 8 or 9 figures, etc.
People do 'do things' with their money.

Very few people hoard cash in mason jars buried in their back yards. Most money is invested. Today banks are paying nada so only fools keep large sums in a savings account.

If your money is in stocks, it is active in the economy. It is building factories, hiring employees, and more.

The problem of why inherited estates diminish is that those estates are in 401[K]s. The heirs could leave the money invested and live on the dividends, but they dont. They want to spend it.

Just like a lottery winner. Lottery winners could invest their winnings, and establish a large holding, but they never do, they spend it until it is all gone.

As for the economy, even if it is all spent on vacations, cars, boose and loose women, it is still energizing the economy. Someone had to build that car, Even in Tahiti someone had to clean the vacation suite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2017, 06:43 AM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,471 posts, read 61,423,512 times
Reputation: 30439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tominftl View Post
Nothing can be done as long as Republicans run things...
Well we all just got a drop in our taxes, so that is something.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2017, 09:01 AM
 
1,514 posts, read 891,633 times
Reputation: 1961
Out of curiosity, has anyone who has already posted on this thread actually watched the video in the original post from start to finish? It is a fairly short video, just a few minutes long.

Last edited by txbullsfan; 12-21-2017 at 09:46 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2017, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Portal to the Pacific
8,736 posts, read 8,674,107 times
Reputation: 13007
Quote:
Originally Posted by txbullsfan View Post
Has anyone here actually watched the video in the original post from start to finish?
No. And I'm not going to.

Solving human inequality in itself is not a passion of mine.

If this were a conversation and if that was a video about climate change and environmental degradation (which has a LOT to do with inequality... inter -and intra- species inequality) then you *might* have my captivated attention.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2017, 09:53 AM
 
1,514 posts, read 891,633 times
Reputation: 1961
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyingsaucermom View Post
No. And I'm not going to.

Solving human inequality in itself is not a passion of mine.

If this were a conversation and if that was a video about climate change and environmental degradation (which has a LOT to do with inequality... inter -and intra- species inequality) then you *might* have my captivated attention.
So you want to post multiple times on a thread that has not "captivated your attention" and you are not willing to read/review all the information (at the very least the short video) that was previously presented in this thread before doing so?

I have a hunch that most of those who have replied here are in the same boat as you in this regard. I hope that this is a misguided hunch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2017, 10:17 AM
 
Location: Central IL
20,722 posts, read 16,386,025 times
Reputation: 50380
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submariner View Post
I get it that a lot of people are up in arms about this topic.

How is it "negatively affecting" you?

I have friends who have been protesting this new tax bill. I have looked at two different online tax calculators, and both of them say that my tax obligations will go down. So I have asked some of my protesting friends, if this new bill will hurt them in some manner. So far I have not isolated anyone of them, who will actually be 'hurt' in any context.

Yes, there are rich people. And there are poor people. I am a retiree, my pension is roughly equal to [the old] Minimum-Wage. I make more than enough to support my family. But by all indexes I am 'poor'.

I am not saying this to 'defend' any rich people. But I must ask
how does this "negatively affect" you?

I really want to wrap my mind around the protest.
I guess I try to look beyond my own personal interests. My taxes might be 1% lower THIS year - that doesn't mean throughout the period that the tax bill covers. Others will see far more difference - the "ultrarich".

Regardless of this year's or next year's outcome, what is the bigger impact - now the door is wide open to decimate what is left of our social safety net by cutting those programs to pay for government's gift to the ultrarich.

I guess I benefit little from the tax change in terms of money in my pocket OR from loss of aid from one of those programs (unless we're also talking SS or future Medicare) - but I still care a whole lot what happens to the weakest among us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2017, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Victory Mansions, Airstrip One
6,762 posts, read 5,063,975 times
Reputation: 9214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submariner View Post
People do 'do things' with their money.

Very few people hoard cash in mason jars buried in their back yards. Most money is invested. Today banks are paying nada so only fools keep large sums in a savings account.

If your money is in stocks, it is active in the economy. It is building factories, hiring employees, and more.

The problem of why inherited estates diminish is that those estates are in 401[K]s. The heirs could leave the money invested and live on the dividends, but they dont. They want to spend it.

Just like a lottery winner. Lottery winners could invest their winnings, and establish a large holding, but they never do, they spend it until it is all gone.

As for the economy, even if it is all spent on vacations, cars, boose and loose women, it is still energizing the economy. Someone had to build that car, Even in Tahiti someone had to clean the vacation suite.

Well, yes, the money "goes into the economy". But big estates and yachts really don't do very much. These are people who have enough money to potentially change the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top