Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-29-2023, 02:47 PM
 
8,181 posts, read 2,792,492 times
Reputation: 6016

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikala43 View Post
Of course the "chart" did not separate Fed, City, County or State government.

Positions like firemen, police, forestry, etc. The military has been having a hard time recruiting.
The chart didn't separate the other sectors into subsectors either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-29-2023, 07:58 PM
 
Location: Oregon, formerly Texas
10,066 posts, read 7,239,454 times
Reputation: 17146
A lot of government agencies went into hiring freeze once the pandemic started. Then when the Boomer gov't workers found out how much they hated the pandemic-induced changes, plus saw their assets double in value in 2 years, they started retiring en masse. The hiring freeze kept up through 2022 at many; pandemic protocol died hard in a lot of gov't.

Finally they started hiring again. Combine that with things like the infrastructure bill and IRA, many agencies are in desperate need of people now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2023, 08:02 PM
 
Location: Censorshipville...
4,437 posts, read 8,131,234 times
Reputation: 5021
Quote:
Originally Posted by albert648 View Post
Government hiring should be frozen in perpetuity.
That's how it feels in our team. Team of 5 managing about 2000 servers and growing at any given time. We're constantly patching for new patches or vulnerabilities reported by CISA. Plus hardware and software lifecycles on various components in the architecture. We haven't hired anyone in years but what we manage continues to grow.

Quote:
Originally Posted by albert648 View Post
It wouldn't make a lick of difference how many people are manning the phones if none of them do any work. You could hire 300 million people for those agencies and you still won't be able to get through to anyone.

All government bureaucracies at every level are horribly bloated. You could get rid of 50% of the headcount tomorrow and no one would notice. They would be just as inept as they were with double the headcount.
Quote:
Originally Posted by albert648 View Post
They can work "hard" all they want. Doesn't mean they're productive. No amount of headcount is going to fix a bloated process and red tape.

Virtually all business processes in government are like digging a ditch manually with a pick and shovel then someone else coming along and refilling the ditch with a pick and shovel.

Cut and/or automate the red tape and fire half the headcount. There is no reason any routine government process should take more than 3 business days from start to finish.
You sound like you've got an axe to grind and painting with quite a broad brush. A lot of us have been asked to do more with less.

Head counts in government aren't the problem. It's the gross overspending on pet projects.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2023, 08:05 PM
 
8,181 posts, read 2,792,492 times
Reputation: 6016
Quote:
Originally Posted by oneasterisk View Post
You sound like you've got an axe to grind and painting with quite a broad brush. A lot of us have been asked to do more with less.

Head counts in government aren't the problem. It's the gross overspending on pet projects.
More headcount = more pet projects = more gross overspending.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2023, 08:12 PM
 
Location: Oregon, formerly Texas
10,066 posts, read 7,239,454 times
Reputation: 17146
My experience is that the actual gov't workers and operations are pretty efficient. It's the regulatory burden and laws governing them that are not.

E.g. where I work we jump through 20 hoops for accreditation. We have to hire people who specialize in accreditation and regulatory compliance. The lawmakers impose these laws and regulations, ironically, to make things more "efficient."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2023, 11:18 AM
 
6,706 posts, read 5,935,215 times
Reputation: 17068
To me, the most interesting part of this chart is the Information negative hiring trend.

I resigned a job last year and took some months off, during which many of the major tech cos. laid off hundreds of thousands.

Now I've been looking around and tech hiring appears to be almost frozen, except for the most elite, senior positions. For an average software engineer, it's a terrible job market, comparable to right around January 2002 when the Dot Com crash + 9/11 had basically halted the tech industry for a while.

For elite software people, like the ones who do high volume trading, and high volume (millions per minute) transactions such as Netflix and Facebook, there are jobs, very well paying jobs. For a Java or database programmer, the jobs have dried up. Every job opening attracts hundreds if not thousands of instant applications.

In fact I'm retraining now, taking a course on cyber security toward an industry certification, in hopes of moving into a field that has more demand. I may have to be on call nights and weekends but at least it will be employment.

But, if I wanted to work in the food industry, restaurant or grocery stores, every place in the state seems to be begging for people. A.I. hasn't replaced counter help, yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2023, 03:50 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,872 posts, read 9,536,978 times
Reputation: 15590
Contrary to the rants of some people on this thread, government employment is not even back to pre-Covid levels.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/USGOVT



The reason it's risen so much lately is because governments have been trying to get employment back to where they were prior to Covid. Probably the bulk of this is school teachers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2023, 12:30 PM
 
11 posts, read 4,739 times
Reputation: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by albert648 View Post
Every statist democrat since FDR wants to be FDR.

They'll sooner cause a depression and push everyone into abject poverty than get out of the way.

Seems like it's working. Government spending seems to "raise all ships." Much better than seeing it all go to a company like YRC (Yellow trucking) who got a $700 million covid loan that they will now sign over to the American public through bankruptcy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2023, 12:56 PM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,471,648 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikala43 View Post
Have you EVER tried to get through to the IRS, make a SS appt.?
I made mine easy enough online. I thought it would be a problem since I had to arrange a meeting out of town where my wife was being hospitalized. The first thing the agent said was 'Do you want the good or bad news first?' The bad was I should have enrolled 6 months earlier. The good was he handed me my first SS check - for $23K! Frikin' Feds!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2023, 12:59 PM
 
6,706 posts, read 5,935,215 times
Reputation: 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by tallcoldone View Post
Seems like it's working. Government spending seems to "raise all ships." Much better than seeing it all go to a company like YRC (Yellow trucking) who got a $700 million covid loan that they will now sign over to the American public through bankruptcy.
Government spending is like spitting on a campfire. Not going to make much difference in the long run. Also, unlike the free markets, government doesn't pick the real winners and losers. They just give to their friends, likely donors, racial equity causes, unions, etc.

To really lift all boats, you have to go to supply side thinking and reduce the overall costs of running a business: taxes, regulatory burden, real estate, labor, raw materials, transportation, etc. Government needs to get out of the way, and then the magic of the free market will lift all boats.

We've been distorting the job markets for so long that we're used to it. But there was a time when jobs had a lot more value.

Anyway, to the topic at hand... clearly there's too much government hiring. I'd like to see the government cut way back and step out of the way, and ESPECIALLY stop with the climate stuff that is destroying our economy while probably doing zero to actually change the climate. Just my opinions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top