Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-14-2012, 09:03 AM
 
7,072 posts, read 9,619,168 times
Reputation: 4531

Advertisements

[quote=Malloric;25157169]China 2012 is not China 1970. It wasn't much of an option in 1970. They had no basic infrastructure that manufacturing requires. quote]



Offshoring of electronic products to Japan started in the 1960s. Then the cost of doing business in Japan went up. Look what happened with the cost of Japanese motorcycles between 1970 and 1990. Prices went thru the roof.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-14-2012, 04:23 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 6,734,327 times
Reputation: 2916
Not correct. Deductions are just as huge (if not larger) for the rich than they were before Reagan. The rich have always found their way to obtain huge deductions, before tax rates were lowered, and now. That being the case, why were their tax rates lowered? There's only one answer to that, and we all know it, even those who defend the lowering of the tax rates to the rich.

Back in the 1950s, corps paid about 39% of all income taxes. In the 1990s it was only around 17%. Now it's even lower. In the 70s, the ordinary family paid about $1600 in taxes. In the late 1980s, they paid close to $9,000, yet the millionaires were paying far less taxes around this time than they previously paid. We were told this would function as some magical as trickle down. In other words, whatever money we pumped to the top wealthy in this manner, would trickle back down to us. BS.

That's not what trickled down on the rest of the country.




Quote:
Originally Posted by ram2 View Post
Much more tax deuctions back then. Nobody payed the top tax rates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2012, 05:11 PM
 
Location: Indiana Uplands
26,411 posts, read 46,591,155 times
Reputation: 19559
In the case of the US as a whole LOOK AT MIGRATION PATTERNS. The middle class continues to move where the overall cost of living is lower, BUT a decent amount of good paying jobs exist. The Census Bureau routinely updates population changes on a county by county basis as well as employment percentage changes ove time. This gives me a good "general view" as to where NEW job growth is occurring and what places are stagnating and declining. Demography and economic geography are my passions so I'd be happy to have a discussion with anyone on this thread about some of the finer issues I'm analyzing at the moment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2012, 05:18 PM
 
1,389 posts, read 1,312,942 times
Reputation: 287
Granite, have you read "Coming Apart"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2012, 05:21 PM
 
Location: Indiana Uplands
26,411 posts, read 46,591,155 times
Reputation: 19559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edmund_Burke View Post
Granite, have you read "Coming Apart"?
I haven't. Would you recommend this book?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2012, 05:37 PM
 
1,389 posts, read 1,312,942 times
Reputation: 287
Just got it'd rom library, seems worth the wait.

Have you read Thomas Sowell?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2012, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Indiana Uplands
26,411 posts, read 46,591,155 times
Reputation: 19559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edmund_Burke View Post
Just got it'd rom library, seems worth the wait.

Have you read Thomas Sowell?
I haven't read that author. Is it very political in nature? I'm an Independent so I don't really mind reading anything that seems interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2012, 06:22 PM
 
7,072 posts, read 9,619,168 times
Reputation: 4531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saritaschihuahua View Post
In the 70s, the ordinary family paid about $1600 in taxes. In the late 1980s, they paid close to $9,000

That's not what trickled down on the rest of the country.

You should be complaining to state and local governments for continuing to raise taxes. For example, in the mid-1990s Ohio raised property tax rates and sales tax rates, and other taxes but with no benefit to middle class families.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2012, 06:24 PM
 
7,072 posts, read 9,619,168 times
Reputation: 4531
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraniteStater View Post
In the case of the US as a whole LOOK AT MIGRATION PATTERNS. The middle class continues to move where the overall cost of living is lower, BUT a decent amount of good paying jobs exist. The Census Bureau routinely updates population changes on a county by county basis as well as employment percentage changes ove time. This gives me a good "general view" as to where NEW job growth is occurring and what places are stagnating and declining. Demography and economic geography are my passions so I'd be happy to have a discussion with anyone on this thread about some of the finer issues I'm analyzing at the moment.

Can you tell us the top 10 areas for new job growth and the 10 top areas in decline?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2012, 07:19 PM
 
Location: Indiana Uplands
26,411 posts, read 46,591,155 times
Reputation: 19559
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram2 View Post
Can you tell us the top 10 areas for new job growth and the 10 top areas in decline?
Here Is A Good Sampling Of 10 Counties For Solid New Job Growth In Percentage Terms (2000-2009) Lower 48 States

1) Williamson County, TX (Austin, TX metro area) +74.5% job growth gain
2) Collin County, TX (Dallas/Ft. Worth metro area) +56.3% job growth gain
3) Forsyth County, GA (Atlanta metro area) +95.2% job growth gain
4) Douglas County, CO (Denver metro area) +114.6% job growth gain
5) Loudon County, VA (Washington DC metro area) +69.0% job growth gain
6) Dallas County, IA (Des Moines, IA metro area) +170.5% job growth gain
7) Delaware County, OH (Columbus, OH metro area) +53.7% job growth gain
8) Fort Bend County, TX (Houston, TX metro area) +42.4% job growth gain
9) Montgomery County, TX (Houston, TX metro area) +41.6% job growth gain
10) Denton County, TX (Dallas/Ft. Worth metro area) +42.6% job growth gain

States With The Fastest Percentage Gains In Population: 2010-2011
Texas: 2.1%
Alaska: 1.8%
Utah: 1.9%
Colorado: 1.7%
Washington: 1.6%

States With the Slowest or Negative Percentage Declines In Population: 2010-2011
Michigan: -0.1%
Rhode Island -0.1%
Maine: 0.0%
West Virginia 0.1%
Vermont: 0.1%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top