Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Aren't you the one who accused me one time of a "personal attack" on Ronald Reagan? Yet you come up with this snark.
I don't need to cut and paste this:
The federal portion of K-12 education is 10% of the monies spent, and that includes the school lunch program. In some districts it is much less. For all the weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth about the federal govt, its role in education is minimal!
Ronald Reagan deserves to be attacked, he was just as much of a big government politician as any liberal.
Government spending and control is all over education, and it shouldn't be.
Federal spending in for grades K-12 have increased from 12.5 billion in 1965 to 72.8 billion in 2008. (Source: Cato Institute). Along with that money come a myriad of regulations which LOCAL schools have to follow. K-12 Education Subsidies | Downsizing the Federal Government
NCLB is a national program, as is "Race to the Top". The whole Dept. of Education should be dismantled.
There has been a department of education in some form since 1867. Many of our forefathers found it useful to have such an agency. The DOE has been cabinet level since the Eisenhower adminsitration, in the old Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, and it has been a stand-alone cabinet dept since 1979.
There has been a department of education in some form since 1867. Many of our forefathers found it useful to have such an agency. The DOE has been cabinet level since the Eisenhower adminsitration, in the old Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, and it has been a stand-alone cabinet dept since 1979.
Ummm. Because there is no need for it. We should be asking why we need it, not why we don't. Education is a family concern. The feds should have no part in it. The state of education in the US has not improved since 1979, the creation of the DOE, in fact it's gotten worse.
Ummm. Because there is no need for it. We should be asking why we need it, not why we don't. Education is a family concern. The feds should have no part in it. The state of education in the US has not improved since 1979, the creation of the DOE, in fact it's gotten worse.
And you accused me, in a sarcastic way, of being "very articulate". Tell us WHY there is no need for a DOE. Prove that the "state of education in the US" has become worse since 1979.
And you accused me, in a sarcastic way, of being "very articulate". Tell us WHY there is no need for a DOE. Prove that the "state of education in the US" has become worse since 1979.
First of all, there is no provision under the US Constitution for the Federal government to collect taxes for and fund education. Education, under the constitution, is purely a state responsibility.
Test scores have not risen under the DOE. What we do have is a maze of regulations and mandates that have resulted in reams of unnecesary paperwork for school districts. Paperwork that requires increasing numbers of administrators to decipher, taking dollars away from students in the classroom.
Why not return the $50 billion (2011) budget to taxpayers and local school districts?
One thing people seem to forget is that "public" money is actually OUR money. The government is supposed to be controlled by the citizens of this country, not the other way around. I don't believe that the federal, state, or local government has any business telling me "Thou shalt attend School A. If you don't, then you can go to prison for not educating your children or spend a fortune paying for homeschooling expenses or private school."
But that's what happens. Even if you don't believe that "public" money should be spent on private schools, then you should at least believe that all students should be allowed to have the best education possible. Students should have school choice. They should not be forced to attend a school that is low-performing or a school where they do not feel safe. There are nine high schools in my county, but I was only allowed to go to one of them. It was a low-performing school and didn't have exactly the safest environment. There were eight other high schools. Several would have been better academically performing high schools and all eight would have been safer, but I either had to pay to attend those schools, lie and say I lived in those school zones, or choose a non-public education. That isn't right. Every child should be afforded equal opportunities or at the very least, another free public option. I didn't even have that.
One thing people seem to forget is that "public" money is actually OUR money. The government is supposed to be controlled by the citizens of this country, not the other way around. I don't believe that the federal, state, or local government has any business telling me "Thou shalt attend School A. If you don't, then you can go to prison for not educating your children or spend a fortune paying for homeschooling expenses or private school."
But that's what happens. Even if you don't believe that "public" money should be spent on private schools, then you should at least believe that all students should be allowed to have the best education possible. Students should have school choice. They should not be forced to attend a school that is low-performing or a school where they do not feel safe. There are nine high schools in my county, but I was only allowed to go to one of them. It was a low-performing school and didn't have exactly the safest environment. There were eight other high schools. Several would have been better academically performing high schools and all eight would have been safer, but I either had to pay to attend those schools, lie and say I lived in those school zones, or choose a non-public education. That isn't right. Every child should be afforded equal opportunities or at the very least, another free public option. I didn't even have that.
There should not be any low-performing schools. All schools should teach students to the same high standards, beginning in pre-school. However, many Americans see pre-school as free daycare, not realizing that the achievement gap that begins in the home needs to be targeted as soon after birth as possible. So the gap widens with each passing year. The result is that students arrive at your high school unprepared to do grade-level work.
Your education is suffering because your classmates drag down the level of instruction. All I can tell you is what I say to my own students--If you rely on school to educate you, you will end up badly educated at best. The best educated people have always been self-educated people. The remarkable thing this year is that so many of them believed me and have begun acting upon it.
Read your textbooks before summer vacation, if you haven't done so this year, and school is still in session where you are. If not, then hit the library, preferably a college library, and begin your career of self-study. I highly recommend reading the diary-turned-book written by a high school junior whose parents let her quit school and teach herself. It's called The Day I Became an Autodidact, by Kendall Hailey. It was quite inspiring, and I would lend it to students who were interested. The last time, I didn't get it back, so no one else got to see it. But it's very entertaining, especially if you're the age she was when she wrote it. Good luck!
Last edited by lhpartridge; 05-29-2012 at 04:09 PM..
Reason: A DUH moment. I just realized that the poster is no longer in HS. Advice stands to anyone in a bad school.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.