Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't see this demographic mentioned in polling results. Do they want to try a new party that may create jobs or do they want to keep voting for the party that will extend their unemployment checks?
I don't see this demographic mentioned in polling results. Do they want to try a new party that may create jobs or do they want to keep voting for the party that will extend their unemployment checks?
It will probably depend on the state. In Ca you can be sure they will say "bring Jerry on" other states will vote for change I am betting.
Because republican policies most likely was the cause for their unemployment and republicans refusing to create jobs or help those unemployed, I'd highly doubt any would vote republican.
I don't see this demographic mentioned in polling results. Do they want to try a new party that will throw them out into the street while maximizing the income of the wealthy or do they want to keep voting for the party that will extend their unemployment checks?
Because republican policies most likely was the cause for their unemployment and republicans refusing to create jobs or help those unemployed, I'd highly doubt any would vote republican.
oh come on, let's be fair here. Posts like yours are just the kind that few take seriously, it makes you look pretty stupid to be honest and I doubt you really are. Narrow minded, unable to see any other side yes, stupid I doubt it.
I don't see this demographic mentioned in polling results. Do they want to try a new party that may create jobs or do they want to keep voting for the party that will extend their unemployment checks?
I think they would opt for the Party that wants to do both, not for the Party that wants to prevent both.
oh come on, let's be fair here. Posts like yours are just the kind that few take seriously, it makes you look pretty stupid to be honest and I doubt you really are. Narrow minded, unable to see any other side yes, stupid I doubt it.
Nita
I'm being completely fair and stating points. You seem to just attack with no basis though that is the common republican stance.
It's fact the economic collapse and record job loss happened under bush. Obama has put the brakes on it and some private sector jobs have come back, but the damage has already been done. Not to mention adding insult to injury, the republicans voted against extending unemployment for those desperately looking for jobs.
I'm being completely fair and stating points. You seem to just attack with no basis though that is the common republican stance.
It's fact the economic collapse and record job loss happened under bush. Obama has put the brakes on it and some private sector jobs have come back, but the damage has already been done. Not to mention adding insult to injury, the republicans voted against extending unemployment for those desperately looking for jobs.
You mean voted against extending
unemplyment insurance.
I'm being completely fair and stating points. You seem to just attack with no basis though that is the common republican stance.
It's fact the economic collapse and record job loss happened under bush. Obama has put the brakes on it and some private sector jobs have come back, but the damage has already been done. Not to mention adding insult to injury, the republicans voted against extending unemployment for those desperately looking for jobs.
You do have to admit, Republican voters have a long history of voting for people that hurt them. Isn't there a term for that phenomenon?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.