Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Expecting public hospitals and schools to provide choices in insurance coverage is not a war on religion.
You are right. It is something for the people, not against religion. Leave it to the lame to make it something it isn't for their own personal agenda.... which apparently is against the people.
Insurance companies in the United States must provide this coverage. So Catholic institutions, if they supply insurance will have no choice.
Cover your employees in the United States, it will include contraception coverage. Period. You can't buy insurance in these United States that won't cover contraception.
You always have the option of not providing any coverage.
Even if birth control is covered, you aren't required to use it. What if prenatal care is covered? Should we cut that out of the coverage too because some of the church's members might not be married and it is against their religion to have children out of wedlock?
This post needs to be repeated. It seems before 9-11 happened the repubs used their brains.
You've noticed that too? They would pretend to not see it even if it was tatooed on the inside of their eyelids. It really warrants a thread of its own.
You've noticed that too? They would pretend to not see it even if it was tatooed on the inside of their eyelids. It really warrants a thread of its own.
Well it really started in the 80's (possibly sooner) with the whole "Family Values" mantra. Obviously, politicians or those in power have been manipulating people's emotion since the beginning of our human civilization. But here in the late 20th and early 21st century you have the Karl Rove's of the US political machine appealing and manipulating our emotions because (unfortunately) an emotional argument will trump a logical one. Republicans (not all of them) don't want people to logically think, they want people to react with their emotions and it has been political genius.
You've noticed that too? They would pretend to not see it even if it was tatooed on the inside of their eyelids. It really warrants a thread of its own.
Oh, well. How many times have we seen this before?
The second the president embraces a republican idea, it is bad, bad, bad.
And they still believe that people don't see this clear as day.
So stupid.
Oh, well. How many times have we seen this before?
The second the president embraces a republican idea, it is bad, bad, bad.
And they still believe that people don't see this clear as day.
So stupid.
I have posted that link a few times and neither the OP nor any other Obama basher has addressed it yet. It is radioactive to them...kind of thwarts their intent and phony outrage.
Well it really started in the 80's (possibly sooner) with the whole "Family Values" mantra. Obviously, politicians or those in power have been manipulating people's emotion since the beginning of our human civilization. But here in the late 20th and early 21st century you have the Karl Rove's of the US political machine appealing and manipulating our emotions because (unfortunately) an emotional argument will trump a logical one. Republicans (not all of them) don't want people to logically think, they want people to react with their emotions and it has been political genius.
You are right. It is something for the people, not against religion. Leave it to the lame to make it something it isn't for their own personal agenda.... which apparently is against the people.
Well, when they have nothing else, those straws are tempting to grasp at.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.