Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
True, but I'm not sure that we fared much better with "the guy you'd most like to have a beer with" that was voted into office in each of those elections.
I'm not so sure about Kerry, but I've come to believe Gore would probably have done a better job with the effects of 9/11 than Bush did. For instance, I doubt he would have embarked us on a war against a tactic and probably wouldn't have told us to go the mall when we were waiting for a call to arms.
But, that's just speculation. It is what it is today.
I'm not so sure about Kerry, but I've come to believe Gore would probably have done a better job with the effects of 9/11 than Bush did. For instance, I doubt he would have embarked us on a war against a tactic and probably wouldn't have told us to go the mall when we were waiting for a call to arms.
But, that's just speculation. It is what it is today.
You would honestly rather have a beer summit with Gore over Bush? Bush would be a much better buddy at a beer summit = better president, period.
That is why I am voting for Obama, his beer summits are awesome.
OMG, B. Maher came up with this one referring to Willard Rommney, and it could have not been a better description for the man; Rommney has no wit, no sense of humor, he stutters and stumbles when talking, flip flops on every issue, does not have a clear plan despite running for office for over five years, only right wingers that would vote for a crocodile if the gop candidate, would vote for such an unappealing candidate, look at the
low numbers he attracted during the primaries, overall less than 35% of gop voters, this poor guy will fail miserably, and if he keeps running, I have bad news for him, Hillary may be the opponent for 2016....
So a large fraction of the country faces this choice: re-elect a president with strong convictions that we totally oppose, or elect somebody different who may have a more fluid set of convictions.
We know what we will get with Obama, and don't like it. We don't know what we will get with Romney, but at least it has a chance to be different and better.
OMG, B. Maher came up with this one referring to Willard Rommney, and it could have not been a better description for the man; Rommney has no wit, no sense of humor, he stutters and stumbles when talking, flip flops on every issue, does not have a clear plan despite running for office for over five years, only right wingers that would vote for a crocodile if the gop candidate, would vote for such an unappealing candidate, look at the
low numbers he attracted during the primaries, overall less than 35% of gop voters, this poor guy will fail miserably, and if he keeps running, I have bad news for him, Hillary may be the opponent for 2016....
really? hilary? she is not only old, but looks like she has been drug across the carpet too many times. slick willy's wife will never be potus.
So a large fraction of the country faces this choice: re-elect a president with strong convictions that we totally oppose, or elect somebody different who may have a more fluid set of convictions.
We know what we will get with Obama, and don't like it. We don't know what we will get with Romney, but at least it has a chance to be different and better.
What you get with Mr. steal your pension and load up with debt Romney is a repeat of the last 30 years of failed Conservative economic theory. Once this is pounded on the media outlets the real issues will be seen and Romney will lose. Just ask Anne Colter
Last edited by Boss; 04-15-2012 at 08:40 AM..
Reason: addition
OMG, B. Maher came up with this one referring to Willard Rommney, and it could have not been a better description for the man; Rommney has no wit, no sense of humor, he stutters and stumbles when talking, flip flops on every issue, does not have a clear plan despite running for office for over five years, only right wingers that would vote for a crocodile if the gop candidate, would vote for such an unappealing candidate, look at the
low numbers he attracted during the primaries, overall less than 35% of gop voters, this poor guy will fail miserably, and if he keeps running, I have bad news for him, Hillary may be the opponent for 2016....
He will beat obama badly and it's gonna be great. The idiocy of the left as demonstrated on c-d forums is the reason why. obama is despised now by anyone with a brain and a little intellectual honesty. Romney loves America and wants everyone to be their best. obama is simply a Chicago thug who hates our country. The biggest flip-flopping liar to ever hold the office and it was fools like the op who made it happen. You clowns owe the country an apology and penance for what you've done to America.
So you are saying that this thread is ridiculous to focus on whether or not someone is boring or not as a presidential quality?
Uh....no. I just answered your question.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
