Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-10-2012, 09:53 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,715,925 times
Reputation: 853

Advertisements

Mitt Romney electoral vote lead holds strong through both conventions




 
Old 09-10-2012, 09:54 AM
 
Location: Greensboro, NC USA
6,157 posts, read 7,224,746 times
Reputation: 2468
LOL this map may be correct in a parallel universe LOL did you take the red pill or the blue pill
 
Old 09-10-2012, 09:55 AM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,533,837 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
I know some keep pushing the Jimmy Carter thing vs. Reagan because of the recession, but a big factor for Reagan was that he was charismatic, and Carter was not. Who's going to win the personality/likeability competition in this race? That's where I think the analogy is flawed.
 
Old 09-10-2012, 09:57 AM
 
Location: State of Being
35,879 posts, read 77,498,031 times
Reputation: 22752
Sad to think people will vote for a candidate with a lousy track record just b/c they like Bill Clinton and they think Obama is cool, lol.

However, I do believe he will win the election. After all, the average IQ is what - 100? lol
 
Old 09-10-2012, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,762,061 times
Reputation: 5691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trace21230 View Post
Why hasn't this thread been merged with the sticky at the top about Presidential polls?

Why, you don't want folks to see this? Sorry Trace, I have seen dozens of your partisan threads. Why are you so eager to bury this one?

By the way, I read Nate Silver's justifications over the weekend. They are pretty well researched and bring in a number of factors and are worth a read. Intrade puts it at 58.9%

Intrade - Barack Obama to be re-elected President in 2012

Personally, I don't like to count my chickens, but it is definitely looking better and better for Obama.
 
Old 09-10-2012, 09:58 AM
F40
 
Location: 85379^85268
826 posts, read 857,504 times
Reputation: 404
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trace21230 View Post
So, why hasn't this thread been moved to the stickied thread about Presidential polls?


More suppression of information that shows the CON?GOP?TALIBAN and their leader getting their AZZES handed to them.

HAHA sucks to be a CON/ GOP/Taliban follower these days huh trace
 
Old 09-10-2012, 10:00 AM
 
4,120 posts, read 6,609,150 times
Reputation: 2290

Hmmmm... Let's look at the news organizations here jt800, the examiner vs. the New York Times...

I'll go with the times as being a little more accurate.
 
Old 09-10-2012, 10:00 AM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,954,468 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddlehead View Post
Why, you don't want folks to see this? Sorry Trace, I have seen dozens of your partisan threads. Why are you so eager to bury this one?

By the way, I read Nate Silver's justifications over the weekend. They are pretty well researched and bring in a number of worth a read. Intrade puts it at 58.9%

Intrade - Barack Obama to be re-elected President in 2012

Personally, I don't like to count my chickens, but it is definitely looking better and better for Obama.
I b interested in seeing fair treatment of all threads. But that doesn't always happen around here.
 
Old 09-10-2012, 10:01 AM
 
Location: NC
1,672 posts, read 1,771,510 times
Reputation: 524
Do you really, honestly believe that map?
 
Old 09-10-2012, 10:02 AM
 
Location: NC
1,672 posts, read 1,771,510 times
Reputation: 524
Quote:
Originally Posted by bellhead View Post
Hmmmm... Let's look at the news organizations here jt800, the examiner vs. the New York Times...

I'll go with the times as being a little more accurate.
What's stupid about that source is that even if so biased, it SHOULDN'T BE or it will lull its readers into complacency where they say "oh Romney has it in the bag, I don't need to do anything."

It is like the opposite of what they should be doing since the main readers of that site are already heavily right.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top