Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I know some keep pushing the Jimmy Carter thing vs. Reagan because of the recession, but a big factor for Reagan was that he was charismatic, and Carter was not. Who's going to win the personality/likeability competition in this race? That's where I think the analogy is flawed.
Why hasn't this thread been merged with the sticky at the top about Presidential polls?
Why, you don't want folks to see this? Sorry Trace, I have seen dozens of your partisan threads. Why are you so eager to bury this one?
By the way, I read Nate Silver's justifications over the weekend. They are pretty well researched and bring in a number of factors and are worth a read. Intrade puts it at 58.9%
Why, you don't want folks to see this? Sorry Trace, I have seen dozens of your partisan threads. Why are you so eager to bury this one?
By the way, I read Nate Silver's justifications over the weekend. They are pretty well researched and bring in a number of worth a read. Intrade puts it at 58.9%
Hmmmm... Let's look at the news organizations here jt800, the examiner vs. the New York Times...
I'll go with the times as being a little more accurate.
What's stupid about that source is that even if so biased, it SHOULDN'T BE or it will lull its readers into complacency where they say "oh Romney has it in the bag, I don't need to do anything."
It is like the opposite of what they should be doing since the main readers of that site are already heavily right.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.