Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
nobody wishes the worth for our country, but there might be some truth to "the blessing in discuise"
From all the comments on these boards and others, I must disagree that 'nobody wishes the worst for our country'. There are plenty of small minded sore losers who hope things get worse under Pres. Obama's second term, so they can get their party back in power.
-----------------The Democrats now have complete ownership of the wreckage of the last four years, and will have no excuses left when things do not improve, but are worsened by their reckless and foolish policies.
This leaves the door wide open for the mid-term elections in 2014, when many more Democrat Senators will be vulnerable, and for a Republican to be sent to the White House in 2016, thus saving the Republic.
No, republican Congress has ownership of the "wreckage" for trying to destroy a presidency at the country's expense, and extending Bush policies. You are aware that republicantrickle-down and tax breaks have continued? Yet you blame the outcome on Obama.
Amazing!!
A corporate-controlled government in 2016 will be a fascist paradise - not a republic. A republic has a citizens' representative government, not Wall Street control, which seems to be what you repugs are aiming for.
LOL, Bush is president AGAIN. Obama is just a figure head. I say if you want to insist on "pay their fair share" then make it the same percentage across the board and for EVERYONE. When our government overspends we all have skin in the game including all classes. In the case of the welfare leaches they just get a smaller check, the rich also pay.
From all the comments on these boards and others, I must disagree that 'nobody wishes the worst for our country'. There are plenty of small minded sore losers who hope things get worse under Pres. Obama's second term, so they can get their party back in power.
You wish it gets worse on small business owners because they are successful don't you. Mind you, these people have nothing to do with what the banks did yet you wish them financial harm. Obama did push for legislation for the banks to make loans to people who could not afford and the people who got these loans helped sink the housing market yet once again, the wrong people get the blame and pay the price.
LOL, Bush is president AGAIN. Obama is just a figure head. I say if you want to insist on "pay their fair share" then make it the same percentage across the board and for EVERYONE. When our government overspends we all have skin in the game including all classes. In the case of the welfare leaches they just get a smaller check, the rich also pay.
The biggest leachers around are the ones from red states.
Hillary is too old and too tarnished. She has "Benghazigate" written all over her with the blood of four dead Americans.
Hillary has been sucking up to Muslims, which most Americans find anathema to who we are as Americans, because she is acquiescing freedom of speech to Muslim speech codes. This does not sit well with the majority of Americans who do not support the idea of "hate speech" but see it as a threat to liberty.
In short: She has too much baggage.
Based on your theory, President Ronald Reagan should be pilloried and run out of town on a rail based on the fact that he had a big landing of Marines in Lebanon, housed them in a barracks, had the barracks blown up and 258 marines killed and countless injured then immediately pulled them out of the country. Net gain. US-0. terrorist bomber-258.
And how come nobody said sheit about the seven embassies and US state Dept. compounds attacked under George W. Bush? Don't they matter? What is noteworthy is the fact that the democrats were not screaming for Bush's head on a pike when these embassies were attacked.
But Seven U.S. Embassies And Consulates Were Attacked Under George W. Bush
Based on your theory, President Ronald Reagan should be pilloried and run out of town on a rail based on the fact that he had a big landing of Marines in Lebanon, housed them in a barracks, had the barracks blown up and 258 marines killed and countless injured then immediately pulled them out of the country. Net gain. US-0. terrorist bomber-258.
And how come nobody said sheit about the seven embassies and US state Dept. compounds attacked under George W. Bush? Don't they matter? What is noteworthy is the fact that the democrats were not screaming for Bushes head on a pike when these embassies were attacked.
But Seven U.S. Embassies And Consulates Were Attacked Under George W. Bush
Tell me why my post is not relevant to the situation at hand? You people disgust me. All you care about is getting that N***** out of the white house by any means necessary. You lose the election and this is all you have left to hang your hat on. Bah! Humbug.
To answer your question. He is president. He has been president for four years and he will remain president for the next four years.
Whatever soothes the pain from such a horrible defeat. Just brace yourself for 2016 as Hillary moonwalks to the Whitehouse.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
