Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Does Mitt Romney have a smirk on his face?
Yes, and it makes him seem like a real ****** 18 60.00%
NO, I do not see a smirk 8 26.67%
Maybe, I will have to watch him closer 4 13.33%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-13-2008, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,351,970 times
Reputation: 15291

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by vickilynn View Post
As a current English teacher, and a former Mormon, I can vouch that you are correct.
Thank you. May I buy you a cup of coffee? Or a Coke?

 
Old 01-13-2008, 09:25 PM
 
Location: On my way to FLA baby !!
1,999 posts, read 1,666,870 times
Reputation: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqw9gfo View Post
Actually, Yeledaf got it right. To Allot means to "allocate" or to distribute. So not only did you misuse the word "allot" you don't even understand when it is used correctly.
Actually I know he got it right. I was setting you up for you to come back with your stupid corrective postings.

And what do you have to say about Mitt Romney.

And you said there is no such word as "allot". Do you see me ripping you for being so wrong.

Find something useful to do, this is not grammeeeerrr class.
 
Old 01-13-2008, 09:31 PM
 
Location: On my way to FLA baby !!
1,999 posts, read 1,666,870 times
Reputation: 357
Ok.....

Now I know what your doing. Your a Ron Paul backer and cannot stand for anyone like me to not like him. I actually do not like the man.

In almost all your post you seem to always correct someone for something.

Who the heck died and made you so perfect.

Some are weak on grammer, some on math, some on history but what you are weak on is character.

You are new to this forum, could you please stop correcting everyone and everybody for mistakes.

I see you are even telling people how to post and what to state, breaking down everything they state.

We dont need a forum police, we alreayd have them. You need to stop posting in this forum and go the to grammar forum so you can be useful to someone who cares what you think.

So please stop correcting everyone and STAY ON THE TOPIC.
 
Old 01-13-2008, 09:43 PM
 
71 posts, read 35,888 times
Reputation: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floridabound09 View Post
So please stop correcting everyone and STAY ON THE TOPIC.
I actually haven't corrected "everyone" and have only corrected you. I have seen your posts and I thought your posts were ignorant and the fact that you have trouble with spelling underscores your lack of intellect.

And what topic am I supposed to stay on? "Noticing Romney's smirk?" How about you focusing on something that is important to "everyone" including your daughter who is going to be passed the bill ($9.2 Trillion and counting) about which no one wants to talk?
 
Old 01-13-2008, 10:11 PM
 
8,231 posts, read 17,329,518 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilypad View Post
Yes, it is called piety. Fundamentalists are raised on it. Huckabee hides his well...

McCain is just plain angry. I would be too if I spent years in a prison camp. Because he has the most experience and is strong on terror, I will probably go with him, and hopefully as a nation we can persuade him to do SOMETHING definitive about the border. How can one be strong on terror and not care about the border, a real disconnect. Just not many good choices out there, soooooooooo scary.
Could it be because he's sold out to the moneyed interests who profit from illegal immigration? He's no stranger to kickbacks and 'donations'....look up the Keating 5.
 
Old 01-13-2008, 10:13 PM
 
8,231 posts, read 17,329,518 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by M TYPE X View Post
Republicans require their candidates to have 1) loving wives and 2) good smirks.
The question is HOW MANY loving wives? Reagan had 2, McCain's had 2, Rudy's had 2 (or is it 3?), Fred's had 2....
 
Old 01-13-2008, 10:37 PM
 
471 posts, read 1,509,855 times
Reputation: 227
cqw9gfo - this isn't grammar 101

What part of "no personal attacks" did you not understand?
 
Old 01-13-2008, 10:42 PM
 
8,231 posts, read 17,329,518 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by emeraldsky View Post
cqw9gfo - this isn't grammar 101

What part of "no personal attacks" did you not understand?
No personal attacks? Oh, is that a rule? It seems like plenty of people around here love to call RP supporters wackos, ignorant, uninformed, delusional, and so on.... nice to know there's a rule about it; I might not have to use 'Ignore' so much.
 
Old 01-13-2008, 10:48 PM
 
11,135 posts, read 14,203,422 times
Reputation: 3696
My apologies for letting this thread go on for far too long
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top