Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Waiting for the fact-check on Hillary Clinton, that should be interesting. I won't hold my breath though. Gee is it a coincidence that both the establishment left and the establishment right have set about smearing Senator Paul? Perhaps their cages have been rattled a bit.
Hillary has been lying to herself the first time she hopped in bed with a man.
So 10 hours later, and OP never returned to back up her accusation. Standard operating skedaddle for a poster of this ilk. Toss the bomb, then turn tail and run for the tall grass.
It looks like call them liars has been officially added to the old standby of "call them racists."
I refer to bolded as, "kicking the ant hill." Someone posts something to stir things up, gets everyone in a tizzy, and walks away.
I refer to bolded as, "kicking the ant hill." Someone posts something to stir things up, gets everyone in a tizzy, and walks away.
Yeah but why would anyone want to kick an anthill? After all we know that ants are among the most admirable critters on God's green earth. Carry up to 10 times their weight, prepare for the winter months, and so on.
OP still not back to answer questions and criticisms. Par for the course for a left wing liberal.
Waiting for the fact-check on Hillary Clinton, that should be interesting. I won't hold my breath though. Gee is it a coincidence that both the establishment left and the establishment right have set about smearing Senator Paul? Perhaps their cages have been rattled a bit.
FYI, I have never seen a Fact-Check for Hilary,have you?
I just did a search for one and this is all that I came up with....
Fact Check: Hillary Clinton, Those Emails And The Law
In fact, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said last month, "For some historical context, Secretary Kerry is the first secretary of state to rely primarily on a state.gov email account."
The bottom line is this: No one will likely ever know what was deleted from Clinton's server. Barring one of the 30,000 emails Clinton turned over to the State Department being deemed "classified," it's also unlikely she will ever be found to have violated the letter of the law.
Yeah but why would anyone want to kick an anthill? After all we know that ants are among the most admirable critters on God's green earth. Carry up to 10 times their weight, prepare for the winter months, and so on.
OP still not back to answer questions and criticisms. Par for the course for a left wing liberal.
WHAT QUESTIONS,and you're calling me a liberal?! Socially,I am conservative,fiscally, I am liberal,so many do not fit into an asinine little box,now do they?
Ok, evidence of "intent to deceive" I guess that would be like proving that Hilary "intended" deception by handling her own e-mails,now wouldn't it? Everyone knows damn well that she did,but how does one "prove" that... other than by finding a personal note by herself describing her intent,or a tape of her admitting it?
Same with Rand, I have no doubt that he knew he was exaggerating/stretching the truth,but if you want to believe otherwise.....you go right ahead,as for myself...I don't IGNORE the facts!
Last edited by i_love_autumn; 04-09-2015 at 04:06 AM..
Yes, he is a habitual liar and a plagiarist. I think he's running for the sole purpose of making the REAL preferred GOP candidate (Jeb Bush) not look as bad.
It's a way for the GOP to paint their preferred guy in a positive light, by comparing him to the atrocious Paul, even though his ideology still reeks of more Bush.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.