Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
i would veto jeb, just because i don't think he has the right to be president just because he's a bush,
04-12-2015, 12:37 PM
i7pXFLbhE3gq
n/a posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohawkx
Thanks for the clarification. We are on the same page regarding Cruz. But Clinton...............that's where we part ways. I'm all in with Clinton. I think she's the best person in the nation to be the next president. She's tough, experienced and politically savvy to handle the "take no prisoners" politics of today. The Margaret Thatcher of American Politics.
This.
The reason I didn't vote for her in 2008 is the same reason I will vote for her in 2016. In 2008 I was naive enough to think Obama, being far less abrasive and much more compromising, would do a better job. But at this point the right wing has become so extreme, so disconnected from reality, and so brazenly anti-American that we need someone who won't take their crap.
Looking at the number of people possibly considering a GOP primary run, part of me would like to see the parties limit the number of primary opponents they allow - a way of saying "look, you're in or you're out, don't dither around waiting for the other candidates to implode and waltz in without as thorough a vetting through the whole campaign process"
Such a policy might even have the side benefit of eventually creating more viable alternative parties to the two majors.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.