Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Koch ‘Endorsement’ of Scott Walker Never Really Happened
A couple hours after the Times story broke, David Koch clarified what he had really said. “While I think Governor Walker is terrific, let me be clear, I am not endorsing or supporting any candidate for president at this point in time,” he said in a statement.
Walker has balanced the Wisconsin budget and lowered property taxes. Wisconsin is still a heavy Dem State plus the Evil Union influence. : think:
Walker survived storming of the Capital and a recall election. Walker must be doing something right!
Lets turn this thread around and ask the question.
Why would anyone support such a corrupted Presidential Candidate like Ms. Clinton? Do you realize there people in prison because they refuse to testify against the Clintons (White Water). Ms. Susan Doogle a bell?
She has pay offs as Sectary of State and had unauthorized e-mail that has disappeared. If Clinton was a Republican you would be demanding their arrest and dropping as a Presidential hopeful.
Why is Clinton leading as a Dem. Because the party has dictated Hilary as the one. Bad for Dem good for the GOP.
First of all, there are 25 boring "Hillary-is-horrible" threads going at any given moment in the P&C forum, but you still want to talk about how much you hate her in a Scott Walker thread? Your hate-Hillary obsession says more about you than her.
Your obsessive hate for Hillary, overuse of emoticons and bolding notwithstanding, Walker's popularity in Wisconsin has taken a nosedive. Personally, I find that more meaningful than your off-topic criticism of Hillary Clinton. If he's doing such a great job, why are Wisconsinites liking him less? Walker must be doing something wrong!
sigh.. You have no idea but continue to post. FEMA is a perfect example. Wisconson pays into the system on FEMA. It's THEIR money. That's another problem you have at times. The inability to take the thought process to the next level.
Get it now?
I think you should read my posts. You couldn't be more incorrect. I post quotes, that relate to the relevant facts, from the links I cite. I give credit to those who provided these facts so as not to plagiarize.
You post links but don't have the ability to expand on that or take the thought process to the next level. I just showed you in my post right before this. Like I said, at times you just post the link.
I'll connect the dots for ya. Walker balances budget by borrowing and by government subsidies. Tea partiers are against borrowing. Scotty is a Tea partier. Tea party rules apply to others, not Scotty.
I back up all of my facts with their sources. If that bothers you it is really because the facts bother you.
So if I created a thread citing a story I would write, showing Obama balanced the budget, by borrowing, you'd be equally appalled? Can I expect you to source the story on anti Obama threads?
While David Koch did not formally endorse Scott Walker, but he did say this (from the OP):
"We will support whoever the candidate is," David Koch said at a fund-raising event in Manhattan for the New York State Republican Party, according to the newspaper. "But it should be Scott Walker."
So you admit he wasnt endorsed, meaning the other posters demand for "accuracy", stopped when it involves his own statements.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.