Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I voted No because I expect another recession to begin in the U.S. sometime between 2018 and 2020, which in turn will result in Hillary Clinton either losing reelection in 2020 or not seeking reelection in the first place. After all, an economy can't keep growing non-stop forever.
I voted she will not win in 2016, but reardless this is a poll that means nothing right now. Most polls, even prediciting the 2016 outcome mean nothing, certainly looking that far ahead really is meaningless. Among other things, at her age, she might not even be able to compete again.
I voted she will not win in 2016, but reardless this is a poll that means nothing right now. Most polls, even prediciting the 2016 outcome mean nothing, certainly looking that far ahead really is meaningless. Among other things, at her age, she might not even be able to compete again.
Ronald Reagan was able to compete again in 1984 at age 73, though. Plus, on average, women live longer than men live.
Hillary isn't going to be elected in 2016. In fact, I seriously doubt that she gets the nomination at this point.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.