Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But Hillary has the liberal media, entertainment industry, welfare freebies establishment, and liberal political machine behind her which even Trump Industries can't compete with.
And do you really trust Trump with the nuclear button?
Yet even with all that advantage & huge piles of crony capitalist money behind her, she is barely squeaking by a 75 year old hippy socialist.
Even then they have to pull strings for her. Harry Reid, convinced the local union bosses to make sure those who will caucus for Hillary got paid time off to do it.
But Hillary has the liberal media, entertainment industry, welfare freebies establishment, United Nations, Human Rights orgs, and liberal political machine behind her which even Trump Industries can't compete with.
And do you really trust Trump with the nuclear button?
Americans are seeing through the lib media, and they're tired of being taken advantage of.
Whether that will translate into a Trump victory or not is something that I can't predict.
But in terms of the laws of political correctness, Trump should have self-destructed a long, long time ago.
Hasn't happened.
And I'm fine with him having his finger on the nuclear button.
Yes and Rubio has less than 30%.... Rubio is the one who needs to be thinned out....Can't even handle his own finances much less the nations....If something dire happened under his presidency he would **** his pants and start crying uncontrollably.
Rubio would be my last choice. But I don't like Cruz either. My feeling is that as long as both of them are pulling in votes; they both hurt each other's chance to overthrow Trump. If one of them would bow out early; the other might pick up enough votes to give Trump a run for the money. But I don't think either will bow out if they still feel they are in striking range - they could be their own worse enemies. By the time they realize this; it could be too late.
Yet even with all that advantage & huge piles of crony capitalist money behind her, she is barely squeaking by a 75 year old hippy socialist.
Even then they have to pull strings for her. Harry Reid, convinced the local union bosses to make sure those who will caucus for Hillary got paid time off to do it.
Thanks! I had not seen that: Reid, powerful union come to Clinton Who doesn't like time off from work? Of course, one's integrity would be in question if they did it just to get off work but, then again, one's integrity would be in question if they supported Hillary.
Thanks! I had not seen that: Reid, powerful union come to Clinton Who doesn't like time off from work? Of course, one's integrity would be in question if they did it just to get off work but, then again, one's integrity would be in question if they supported Hillary.
Yep. Yet again Hillary can't win an election by competitive means. They had to pay people to go caucus for her.
And Trump has improved his likability ratings -- while the wicked witch in the pantsuit has not.
Clinton has so much baggage in her and her husband's scandalous and disgraceful personal life, her failed tenure as Secretary of State, her email, Benghazi and Clinton Foundation felonies, her husband's NAFTA and repeal of Glass-Steagle, and her kissing up even now to Obama (a complete failure as president) that Trump will make mincemeat out of her in the general election.
Clinton can't even win with young women. She was done before she even got started.
I agree. Also, Bernie keeps pushing her to the left as she tries to 'out progressive' him. Trump is likely watching video-tapes her speeches and town hall remarks getting his attacks honed.
What I don't get is that if the republicans( and God Bless Them) have figured out that we just can't have another Bush in The White House, how is it that the democrats have not been able to come to grips with the fact that another Clinton would be just as disastrous if not worse? I know they're more likely to just vote as told to and not think too much but come on.
What I don't get is that if the republicans( and God Bless Them) have figured out that we just can't have another Bush in The White House, how is it that the democrats have not been able to come to grips with the fact that another Clinton would be just as disastrous if not worse? I know they're more likely to just vote as told to and not think too much but come on.
The Dems are a "collective" and will vote as they are told to vote.
I don't see how Trump can get all 50 delegates. To get them all you have to win every district and I don't think he accomplished this.
I just saw MSNBC. They had Trump by phone. He won all 7 Congressional Districts so he gets all 50 delegates.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
