Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wait until after the State of the Union address when Trump gets a chance to finally list all of his accomplishments which have been censored by opposition aka propaganda media. The Loonies will be staring at the TV, heads cocked to one side like a dog hearing a strange sound, asking, "Wuht? How did Trump do so much if he was playing golf all the time and eating so much vanilla ice cream and Diet Coke?"
Maybe the dim bulbs over their pea brained heads will flicker a little brighter when it dawns on them that they have been lied to by the media.
Will Kirsten Gillibrand or Kamala Harris have better luck?
The democrats lack a message - even 14 months after the election. Trump, despite innumerable faults, won because he had a message.
If Gillibrand's or Harris' message is that they are female and that resources should be re-distributed from those who create them to those who don't, it's highly unlikely that they will win.
The longer the Russia investigation goes on the more time that mainstream, elected Democrats will waste playing good party member and the more the fringes of the party will create positions that are untenable to the majority of Americans.
Every Trump supporter can tell you what they stand for: Make America Great Again!
Ask a longtime Democrat voter what the Democratic Party stands for and it's unlikely that you will hear a concise statement.
The democrats lack a message - even 14 months after the election. Trump, despite innumerable faults, won because he had a message.
I don't care much for Trump and I won't be voting for him but this is true. They haven't had a message in years that people were interested in.
Quote:
If Gillibrand's or Harris' message is that they are female and that resources should be re-distributed from those who create them to those who don't, it's highly unlikely that they will win.
The longer the Russia investigation goes on the more time that mainstream, elected Democrats will waste playing good party member and the more the fringes of the party will create positions that are untenable to the majority of Americans.
Every Trump supporter can tell you what they stand for: Make America Great Again!
Ask a longtime Democrat voter what the Democratic Party stands for and it's unlikely that you will hear a concise statement.
I've been saying all year that "Russia" is NOT how you win. Finding someone that can relay a message the people can support and is believable is how you win. So far it isn't happening.
I always said that one sure sign that polling was off during the 2016 election came from polls that showed Hillary competitive in deeply conservative Republican states like Utah and South Carolina.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
